07 Aug 2010, 2:45 pm
GoatOnFire wrote:
That was sexist! 
First she implied that women are weak by taking like 3 f***ing minutes to open a f***ing can of sh**.
Then she implied that women were anorexic by smearing that poopy looking sh** on her knockers but not eating any of it. 2 girls 1 cup was also sexist because it implied women are bulimic but it had more artistic merit than this.
Then she implied that women are attention whores by sticking her hand in her pants and peeing in front of an audience.
What a sexist b***h. Feminists should be offended. Her art indicates that she wants all women to go back to the kitchen.
Perhaps (taking a shot in the dark here) that was part of the point, but she didn't really seem to glorify those implications - maybe, trying to get the point across that those sexist implications are stupid?
First she implied that women are weak by taking like 3 f***ing minutes to open a f***ing can of sh**.
Then she implied that women were anorexic by smearing that poopy looking sh** on her knockers but not eating any of it. 2 girls 1 cup was also sexist because it implied women are bulimic but it had more artistic merit than this.
Then she implied that women are attention whores by sticking her hand in her pants and peeing in front of an audience.
What a sexist b***h. Feminists should be offended. Her art indicates that she wants all women to go back to the kitchen.
But then again, due to how it really invited negative reactions, how could it make a point anyways...
I still don't know. >.< Maybe again I'm analyzing too much.
ShenLong
Veteran
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,277
Location: With Murphy Freestylin' and Ricky Easy
08 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
GoatOnFire wrote:
That was sexist!
First she implied that women are weak by taking like 3 f***ing minutes to open a f***ing can of sh**.
Then she implied that women were anorexic by smearing that poopy looking sh** on her knockers but not eating any of it. 2 girls 1 cup was also sexist because it implied women are bulimic but it had more artistic merit than this.
Then she implied that women are attention whores by sticking her hand in her pants and peeing in front of an audience.
What a sexist b***h. Feminists should be offended. Her art indicates that she wants all women to go back to the kitchen.
First she implied that women are weak by taking like 3 f***ing minutes to open a f***ing can of sh**.
Then she implied that women were anorexic by smearing that poopy looking sh** on her knockers but not eating any of it. 2 girls 1 cup was also sexist because it implied women are bulimic but it had more artistic merit than this.
Then she implied that women are attention whores by sticking her hand in her pants and peeing in front of an audience.
What a sexist b***h. Feminists should be offended. Her art indicates that she wants all women to go back to the kitchen.
I watched a minute before I quit from boredom. Glad I quit.
08 Aug 2010, 8:34 am
One-Winged-Angel
Veteran
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,860
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, in your head
08 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
08 Aug 2010, 3:08 pm
09 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm
One-Winged-Angel wrote:
I have never in my life seen someone struggle so much with a simple can opener.
Then you've obviously never met me.
All I can say is, I'm happy that my favorite brand of ravioli comes with lids that "pop" open...
Speaking of ravioli, I'm glad the lady in the video used Spaghettios instead of Chef Boyardee's, or I would never be able to eat ravioli again in my life.
I have a couple of questions about this video besides "is it art?":
1) What exactly was that dark stuff she smeared all over her shirt?
2) Was she peeing or was it Spagghettios coming out of her after she cut the hole in her pants?
09 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
09 Aug 2010, 2:10 pm
10 Aug 2010, 10:52 pm
11 Aug 2010, 12:27 am
11 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
11 Aug 2010, 1:13 pm
