Is it abnormal to be a good writer when you have Aspergers?

Post Reply New Topic

I'm not too keen on applying a term like "Aspergers" to writers whose trascendence is far above and beyond that of the term in question.
I'd suggest Lovecraft as one who had at least some traits that are commonly attributed to Asperger's. Franz Kafka has been sugested - not surprisingly. Jorge Luis Borges would be worth taking a look at too.
. . .but then, these people were geniuses in the most trascendent sense; far beyond what some shrink could possibly label them post-mortem.

True, Whisperer. Perhaps it's their genius that causes their writing to connect to so many people in the writing. But as an aspie, it seems evident to me that some authors stand far above others in my own esteem; Borges and Kafka being two prime examples. So, regardless of what the authors may be labelled themselves, the readers must be able to comprehend the unique perspectives they provide for whatever reason, be it Aspergers or just subversive tendancies.

I wouldnt be surprised to find that many of today's shrinks began their interest in the field of psychology by reading fiction from the likes of Borges or Kafka. So, in a way it's like the fiction writing informs the study of the mind and is immune from examination.

I've been told I'm a great writer! I don't think it's abnormal at all.

One of my high school English teachers told me that, whatever I did with my life, I would always be a writer. An English teach in college used my work as an example of how to write well and my presentation of the work as an example of how to read for an audience.

It's not abnormal, I am without a doubt better at writing then verbalizing my thoughts.

Aspies usually have a specific set of things they're good at, and everything else they suck at. XD So I'm a good writer, but it's just one of my talents. I suck at math; many aspies have math be one of their main skills, and often aren't quite as good at artistic crafts such as writing.

Apparently, it's abnormal to be good at anything creative when you have asperger's, which is weird since about 95% of what I do in my spare time is creative.

What they deem as abnormal and not present is simply a fabrication.

Many people like to say that their idea of creativity is the correct one. Something which is simply not the case. They will deem those with illnesses specific ways, because that is what they assume or feel.

However, if one were to make an extremely algorithmic definition of the science for asperger's..."lack of creativity", would not be a symptom of the list.

From what I've heard, aspies can be very creative. They can write very well, they just have to work a little harder at it, that's all. Check wikipedia - most of the famous aspies listed there are artists, designers and writers. I believe in the right brain/left brain theory where a person's logical side can be far more dominant than their creative side and vice-versa. I'm a creative, and I'm lousy at math. I can write, though, and am very creative art-wise. I think in aspies, this trend continues to a more extreme level. I'm sure there are studies on this angle, somewhere. If not, there SHOULD be.

only possible drawback I would see would be characterization; development, progression, 'fleshing out the character', and interactions with other characters. this might be a bit of a challenge...but nothing impossible. Aside from that, we seem to be a pretty literate bunch...