Cade wrote:
Orwell wrote:
I abhor minimalist "music," if it can even count as such.
It does. Try to be more open-minded and perhaps study a little about how music has evolved over the centuries. Besides just because you personally don't like it doesn't mean it's not music or has no artistic or aesthetic merit. If you want to make an argument that all music should be judged subjectively and ahistorically, outside of its cultural context, then I assure you I can make a devastating, very erudite argument as to why composers like Vivaldi, Mussorgsky, Tchaikovsky, Wagner and Mahler are utter, useless crap, because I personally abhor music based on schmaltziness, banality, utilitarian purposes and self-indulgence.
Wow, that says it all for me, especially Wagner and Mahler. And don't forget Liszt in that mix. All of the pianists at school loved him, except me. I could not stand anything that that man wrote!
As for the minimalists, I like Steve Reich quite a bit. I could probably get into Glass as well, I just haven't had the inclination.
I also have great respect for John Cage. I know he doesn't count as a minimalist (as the definition usually applied), but he was minimalistic in philosophy. He was all about getting people to recognize the sounds around them as music. Roaratorio is one of my favorites.
_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy