nick007 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Blasty wrote:
nick007 wrote:
Blasty wrote:
Anyone who's in it solely for money; "artists" who rely more on their looks and stunts than their talent. Any bands invented by corporations. Anyone who rips off significant parts of their music from older, actually good songs. Anyone whose music is bland and uninteresting enough to get time on "Top 40" stations.
So basically you think most every pop artist out there is the worst rite

Not sure what the eye roll is for, but yeah, they're mostly crap. Commercialism like that does nothing good for music.
Pop music is fast food for the mind. It's just as fattening and unhealthy and the people who consume the real stuff find it appallingly disgusting.
What is the real stuff
I consume it all but I think Disney artist tend to be some of the most screwed-up. Disney liked em cuz they looked hot so they wer able to attract older guys as well as kids. Disney got rid of em 1ce they turned 18 cuz they no longer had the appeal to the kids sense they wer adults & they wer also less appealing to the guys sense they wer no longer thought of as underage. The girls had been used to being the center of attention & getting what they wanted as kids from Disney so they had lots of problems.
Not all pop is bad thou
Music created by musicians and not meddled with by record execs who are looking to solely optimize sales through direct intervention in the writing and recording process. That's not to say there aren't mainstream acts who achieve this and do things on their own terms but you won't find them through the stable of pop stars. They're all performers with the exception of the beak-nosed gag who grew up under a record exec daddy who made sure she was trained to be able to do it herself.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson