Gendered nouns make no sense

Post Reply New Topic

There's more than a little difference between constructing an artificial language and selecting words or usages from a number of closely-related dialects for the purpose of mutual understanding. The latter is more along the lines of careful diction. And certainly Martin Luther's translation of the Bible had a significant influence on which dialect words and expressions became more common, but you have to remember that they were selected from an existing base of German dialects, which were divided as many other languages were at the time. With increased ease of communication, a few dialects inevitably tend to overwhelm the others. The use of a compromise dialect is not an artificial replacement for the language but the natural process of its transformation. And the fact that some words and structures were taken from Latin is no more to the point than the fact that we use Japanese terms when translating manga. It's called borrowing, and all languages do it as most translators try to be true to the source, not to mention the borrowing of new ideas for which there are no native words (and Christianity is full of such concepts that non-Christians don't necessarily already have or need). Christian culture is where most of these borrowed concepts come from, but of course most were borrowed long before anyone would have bothered to construct an "artificial" German.

genderizing generless things insults them

The process of creating modern German went much deeper. The grammar had to been created. The German dialects differ in their grammatical structure significantly: My home dialect e.g. works with two cases: One case used for the Nominative and for the Accusative, the other case combines Genitive and Dative. Other German dialects combine Dative and Accusative (like modern English). The whole system of the Conjunctive has been created along the line of the Latin grammar and can not been found in any of the German dialects (the most German still struggle with the Conjunctive, especially with Conjunctive II). You also find hardly in any German dialect a Future II or a Passive. The most dialects work just with an Indicative, three or even two cases and one form for the Perfect, the Presents and the future.

The mind-blowing complexity of modern German can be only explained from the adoption of a Latin grammar on the top of Germanic languages.



This is going on within the dialects in Germany, were eg. the Frankfurt dialect becomes more-and-more dominate above other dialects of this region. But the promotion of the modern German was project of the elites how needed a fully employed language for administrative and culture needs. Something the dialects could not serve well.



But you you don't the need of translating such stuff prior the late 15th century when slowly the Roman Law became dominate and the administration was in need of translating the term of the Ius Commune into German.

Ill go check them now!

I know...weird, right? I know Welsh has different numbers for masculine and feminine...

If thery're just things, how can they be insulted?

I was thinking the same thing.

I was also thinking, my language, unfortunately, requires me to genderize God. Or, rather, it requires me to either genderize God, depersonalize God, or keep repeating "God" instead of using a pronoun. I tend to go with the genderizing, but I vary the gender.

Now, whether God is of a nature to be able to be offended by genderizing is another debate for another section of the board.

Hey, don't laugh! my desk has massive nads! It's very sensitive about them though (accordingly I'm still looking for it's p****. Yeah, I went there.).

If your desk has nads, it won't have the other thing. Unless it's intersexed.

There's two parts to the desk. I've got to check the other part. Or maybe I just messed up and didnt think about what I was writing.

Easy.....cars, computers, apliences, You have to treat them nicely or they will get you.

God very deliberately created male and female, so why would He be offended by genderizing?

most of life is generless, as well as most if not all unlife

Come again, please?

most of life is generless, as well as most if not all unlife

Do you mean "genderless?"

To be honest, I'm not sure if there are more gendered life-forms on this earth than there are asexual life-forms. Unlife could mean things that are dead or things that were never alive in the first place ... inorganic material.