Moog wrote:
How long have you had the flat monitors, and do you mean to say that you find it hard to mix for 'translatability' now?
Well, I got them in two rounds. I first got a pair of the Yamaha HS80M's back in 2009 without the subwoofer but found out they can't deliver bass at all, so for that amount of time my low end was mostly invisible to me, ultimately I still used Logitech Z4's and volleyed between Reason 4 and ProTools to see if I could work out the difference. Then I bought the HS10W to go with them and still, the lower mids and bass were still overdone - which is a combination of flat response speakers not having the normal commercial curvature that most speakers have (which enhances lows and lower-mids), so I was still trying to make music to sound great to me on those speakers but at the same time I was still ending up with way too much low end because of that. I had to do everything - whether listen to music, play computer games, etc., through them for a good long while to get a knack for what music is supposed to sound like through them. To this day though, I notice that my mixes have a tendency to be most present below 1kHz and above 4kHz, that 1kHz - 4kHz has a bit of a dip and I don't know if its just the way I've tended to like my mixes but I get the impression that not having a nice neat line sloping down from 50/70Hz to 10kHz is also a bit of a mixing issue. I even realize that listening to stuff on my car stereo by the pros that if it were my mix some of that stuff sounds wrong to me (especially certain sounds turned up to jump out of the mix), it seems like there's so much with mixing that you can get away with but at the same time there are a few iron-clad rules where if you're missing them even your best efforts can fall apart.
Mixing is one of those head-achy things for me where its often been my least favorite part of the creative process but at the same time its where so much of the song is essentially made that I can't not push to get better. Its always seemed to me like a good analogy would be having a house where if you turn on the sink the sliding door to the patio opens, you close the sliding door and the basement lights turn on. You turn the basement lights off and the water to the tub turns on, you go to turn the tub off and both the kitchen sink and the patio door open again

. I *like* to think I'm figuring it out better as I go along and how to keep myself from banging my head into the wall, at least at this point I think I'm done reinventing a lot of past mistakes, and I've picked up a good habit of making at least four or five save versions of a tune; ie. you always want to see how far you can tweak and clean-up your sound but fixing it till' its broke is also an incredibly easy thing to do.
Moog wrote:
When I used to be utterly obsessed with music production, I was really hung up on mix and tone qualities, and I gave up because I couldn't achieve the results I wanted on my gear. I prefer just making music for the pleasure of it now, and if I get half decent mix results, that's okay.
I think that's why I left hardware - there was no way I'd ever have enough money to buy four or five synths, a nice big mixing board, a rackmount filled with hardware effects, monitors, etc. etc.. I remember my cousin had all of that, a $30,000 room down his parents basement but - his parents financed all of it. Software makes it all a lot less expensive, a good DAW worth its salt comes with at least so-so versions of everything you'd need DSP-wise for starters, and a quality plugin seems to be 5x - 10x cheaper than its hardware equivalent.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
Last edited by techstepgenr8tion on 12 Mar 2012, 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.