Bun wrote:
Is there a difference between 'favourite' and 'the best' to you? To me there is, but it's hard for me to explain it to people.
For example... The best Echo & The Bunnymen song for me is Nothing Lasts Forever. But my favourite is all of the album Crocodiles. I also think all of Porcupine is *better* than Crocodiles.
I think that for a lot of people, favourite and the best means the same thing, ie. they'd ask you why don't you say it's the best if it's your favourite? But I think music can both be viewed through objective and subjective parameters. Most people can't see how you can view music through objective parameters, so they're stuck with thinking all discussion of quality, aesthetics etc. is subjective. Am I just wired differently to most of the population on that matter, or did you ever feel like I do about the difference between favourite and best?
I often wonder about this.
But I don't think you can judge a piece of music objectively. I don't believe in a lot of harmony theory. Yes, harmony can guarantee that something will sound good, but still everyone prefers different sounds. Perhaps certain notes or chords seem more pleasing to most people and I can see that there are tendencies, but I don't think it's a general rule. Rules are only relative anyway. ^^
I have often been in the same situation as you where I wondered whether my favourite song by a band is not the best song, but the one I like best. And mostly, I thought that the question is redundant. Because if something is "best" it's still no use if I don't like it, i.e. "Stairway To Heaven". Something really pisses me off about the song. And I can even accept other songs by Led Zeppelin and think that I find them boring, but do not give it more thought. With "Stairway To Heaven" though I feel I HAVE to like it because "it's such a good song", "it's important for music history", "the song has an interesting background". The worst thing is that the band really likes the song, too. XD It's a dilemma, you see? ^^ Mostly, I like to believe the song does not exist. (But they have better songs than this one, don't they?) I am basically ignoring my own theory that one song can be "better" than another. Or maybe not. Maybe what I really think is, "Their other songs deserve greater notice than this one because there is no such thing as 'best song'". I think it's very restrictive to think of music in "good" or "bad".
Excuse my incoherence.
_________________
EXPANDED CIRCLE OF FIFTHS
"It's how they see things. It's a way of bringing class to an environment, and I say that pejoratively because, obviously, good music is good music however it's created, however it's motivated." - Thomas Newman