techstepgenr8tion wrote:
A good set is a great thing - ie. a dj who really knows what they're doing creates a journey of it and has a very tightly synergistic set of tunes that build one off the other or soften to a resting point one after the other. I still have some sets from years ago, even as early as the late 90's, that I'll play just because they were so well put together.
When I buy individual tunes though I tend toward the epic stuff - which out of a standard good set it might be my top two or three. Some tunes are built as risers, ie. the whole tune feels like its meant to build up the track in front of it - I tend not to buy those, and one of these days perhaps I should try making one just to assert some discipline over myself.
I really agree with what you're saying.
I also have some sets that are old now but just have great track selection and/or mixing and are just so well put together, it transcends the fact that the individual tracks might be dated.
If I were an aspiring DJ I would be trying to buy a lot of tracks that don't stand out per se, but are solid. Sets can't just be one huge tune after another, they need to rise and fall, peak and valley to be interesting. Otherwise you tend to get into "Cheese Trance" and that sort of thing, which I think a lot of Mix CD's from the late 90's and early 2000's by people who I'd mostly consider to be lesser DJ's ended up being. The type of DJ I would aspire to be (if I had the talent for it) would be one to put in a few stand out tracks at appropriate moments, and build towards them.