ManErg wrote:
RainKing wrote:
I haven't read any of his books, but I should, and I will someday.
Interested as to why you feel "you should"?
"The Crying of Lot 49" is often touted as the ideal introduction, probably because it's his only book thats less than 500 pages. If you don't like this one, you'll certainly hate the rest!
I find his books can't be read in the same way as other authors. Perhaps they require some effort on the part of the reader. I can see a link with the films of David Lynch. Each viewing (or reading) reveals another angle. Multilayered and, even more difficult, containing layers that the author himself is not consciously aware of.
I've read about him, and it looks like it would be worthwhile. I haven't read much fiction lately, but I'm not giving up on it. I'll probably try
The Crying of Lot 49 sometime. Right now I'm actually about to read a book that I'm waiting to get from Amazon.com, but it's not fiction, it's
Difference and Repetition by Gilles Deleuze, some heavy post-structuralist philosophy. I'm sure that you're right that his books require some effort from the reader. I think any book does. You can't just read the words without understanding them, because reading is a process.