TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
trojan51 wrote:
But when the men on here say the like "big women" do they mean fat 300 pound women with tons of fat, or do they mean a broad shouldered woman with a big and solid frame?
Does it matter?
Obviously! Because FAT IS
WRONG.
Had he gone to a link to an article written by a FAT ADMIRER on the first page (the one he first butted into with his declarations)
he would have read this:
"I know I'm biased, but I think F.A.'s are simply more in tune with natural human sexual impulses than non-F.A.'s. We are biologically correct. The human female of reproductive age is genetically designed to be rounded with layers of fat, definitely not skin and bones like the typical fashion model. Those
wonderful fat deposits in the breasts, hips, thighs and buttocks are what create the distinctive body shape that distinguishes women from men, and the fat equips women for the physical rigors of childbearing. A female's well-padded body announces to the world that she is a woman and she's ready to reproduce. From the F.A. point of view, the more
luxuriously upholstered a woman's body is, the louder it's screaming, "LET'S GET IT ON!"
Our culture understands this concept just fine when it comes to breasts. No one ever asks why men like big breasts -- it's taken as a given that we just do. Attitudes about the rest of the female form are where things get screwy. To me, the appeal of a big round butt and big round hips is materially just the same as the appeal of big round ta-ta's. They're all examples of
excess adipose tissue distributed in uniquely feminine configurations. But our pathologically breast-loving, hips-hating society insists there's a polarization of values between these categories of female body fat. I think it's certifiably insane. "
Or there's this one, from Salon Magazine:
My first online date was with a 5-foot-1-inch, 325-pound, 22-year-old model. After a nice dinner, a walk and a late-night stroll, we ended up together for a night. That was when I put my money where my fantasies were; she was a woman who was approximately three times as big as any other human being I had ever touched. She was also, I realized, a living, breathing, feeling person, not an image in a magazine, with vulnerabilities and needs of her own. I didn't quite know where to start. But after a while, I began to happily, gently
lose myself in her spheres, her bountiful soft flesh, her tiny lips and enormous hips. A long-term relationship wasn't in the cards, but that night was an exclamation point to my years of exploration, and it satisfied a deep longing. I wanted more.
http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2006/06/22/big_love
There's no point, really. If someone refuses to believe people have different preferences, then he's not worthy of rational thought or observation to any extent.
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
Last edited by Bethie on 02 Apr 2011, 7:22 pm, edited 3 times in total.