The irrational standards women have toward men

Page 12 of 23 [ 355 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 23  Next

Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

05 Jan 2018, 3:35 pm

Chronos wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!

This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.

Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?

Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.


You're obsessed with smell kraftie... Anyone who looks fit and healthy, will usually smell that way too, unless they haven't showered in weeks.


Because scent, even imperceptible scent such as pheromones, is important to women in mate selection. There have been various studies on this.

Somewhat off topic but I used to have a lab partner who looked like Mario Lopez and was probably the first 10 to ever talk to me, but his breath was so horrible I didn’t want to be near him.


I know, but wouldn't a healthy diet make ones scent more "seducing"? I feel as if that's the case. As far as bad breath goes: Toothpaste.



Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

05 Jan 2018, 3:38 pm

MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.

There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.


There's many reasons for that, you cannot reasonably compare the two, it's not the same thing at all.

Many reasons for...what? Reasons that guys have sex with as many women as possible? Reasons why women have sex with as many guys as possible? Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales?

If you want to tell me I'm wrong, please do and I'll happily discuss it with you. I'm just not able to determine, from what you've written, exactly which statements you're disputing.


Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales.

Very many women can get sex very very easily, while only few guys can actually get sex easily. For guys, being very succesful is a requirement, or the small handful of guys who are just born incredibly handsome, but this percentage is very low: So in summary, for most guys it requires an incredible amount of work, or winning the genetic lottery to reach a place of easy access to sex. This is not the case for women. I would say probably 80-90 % of women could get sex easily, even if they were unemployed and broke.

Add to that, that even when the guy has the right foundation, it is still him who in 90% of cases has to initiate the conversation, be creative and charismatic to win over the woman. It is also still expected that the guy pays for eventual dates. There's a dissproportionate amount of effort and sacrifice, on every step of the way to the bedroom. It might be different for male moviestars and rockstars, but they are outliers to say the least, and it's not very useful to focus on something that only applies to 0.001% of all men.

So it is not so much having sex with the woman that is the achievement, it is all the hard work and achievements made to reach the point where the sex was even possible.
I know alot of you women will try to argue against what I'm saying here, but I think if you're completely honest with yourselves, you will agree that it is not the same, hence men get called studs, and women sluts. Not saying it's right or wrong, just exlaining why this is the case.

Interesting. I appreciate the clarification.

Yes, there's definitely a disconnect between the level of effort required for men vs. women to accumulate a large number of sexual partners. I have noted that many people put extra effort and attention into getting things that are more difficult for them to acquire, and sometimes wonder if the general perception that men want more sex/have a greater libido than women is due at least in part to that disparity. (If other words, in a society where men and women experienced sexual equality with regard to available partners and initiation of encounters, would men still want more sex than women?) I digress.

So if I understand you correctly, you're saying the reason men admire and envy other men who are more successful sexually is because of the awareness that they've had to work harder for it, while the same number of encounters is relatively easy for women to achieve and therefore not deserving of the same admiration. Yes?


Yep, you pretty much hit the nail on it's head.



MissChess
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 5 Dec 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 429
Location: the TARDIS

05 Jan 2018, 4:28 pm

Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.

There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.


There's many reasons for that, you cannot reasonably compare the two, it's not the same thing at all.

Many reasons for...what? Reasons that guys have sex with as many women as possible? Reasons why women have sex with as many guys as possible? Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales?

If you want to tell me I'm wrong, please do and I'll happily discuss it with you. I'm just not able to determine, from what you've written, exactly which statements you're disputing.


Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales.

Very many women can get sex very very easily, while only few guys can actually get sex easily. For guys, being very succesful is a requirement, or the small handful of guys who are just born incredibly handsome, but this percentage is very low: So in summary, for most guys it requires an incredible amount of work, or winning the genetic lottery to reach a place of easy access to sex. This is not the case for women. I would say probably 80-90 % of women could get sex easily, even if they were unemployed and broke.

Add to that, that even when the guy has the right foundation, it is still him who in 90% of cases has to initiate the conversation, be creative and charismatic to win over the woman. It is also still expected that the guy pays for eventual dates. There's a dissproportionate amount of effort and sacrifice, on every step of the way to the bedroom. It might be different for male moviestars and rockstars, but they are outliers to say the least, and it's not very useful to focus on something that only applies to 0.001% of all men.

So it is not so much having sex with the woman that is the achievement, it is all the hard work and achievements made to reach the point where the sex was even possible.
I know alot of you women will try to argue against what I'm saying here, but I think if you're completely honest with yourselves, you will agree that it is not the same, hence men get called studs, and women sluts. Not saying it's right or wrong, just exlaining why this is the case.

Interesting. I appreciate the clarification.

Yes, there's definitely a disconnect between the level of effort required for men vs. women to accumulate a large number of sexual partners. I have noted that many people put extra effort and attention into getting things that are more difficult for them to acquire, and sometimes wonder if the general perception that men want more sex/have a greater libido than women is due at least in part to that disparity. (If other words, in a society where men and women experienced sexual equality with regard to available partners and initiation of encounters, would men still want more sex than women?) I digress.

So if I understand you correctly, you're saying the reason men admire and envy other men who are more successful sexually is because of the awareness that they've had to work harder for it, while the same number of encounters is relatively easy for women to achieve and therefore not deserving of the same admiration. Yes?


Yep, you pretty much hit the nail on it's head.

So far, so good. What's missing in your interpretation, as far as I can tell, is the moral outrage that accompanies judgement of women who are sexually promiscuous.

A woman who enjoys sex with many partners isn't simply dismissed because it's easy for her to achieve that activity. She is looked down on and reviled. She is insulted. She's a whore, a slut, a slag, not fit to meet a man's parents, not fit to be a wife, on and on it goes. This shrieking and clutching of pearls is heaped on her by both men and women.

Yes, in the modern day we're more aware of the risks associated with sexual promiscuity, and I'm aware there's at least a fringe element beginning to judge men for this behavior as well - but there is not, nor has there been, any sort of parity in this arena.


_________________
~MissChess


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,157
Location: Adelaide, Australia

05 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
It's threads like this that make me feel lucky to be asexual.

I'm not sure whether I should feel amusement or envy. I'll admit sex is pretty fun but the baggage that goes along with it is distracting. Then again, I'm highly distractible :)


I'm telling you, I read some of these threads just for pure entertainment. I am truly abnormal. What I've noticed though, is that a lot of people tend to get over their sexual issues in time and find satisfaction, so for those that are having issues, there's hope in that. But it is a bit humorous watching them get to that point. And you know how I know they've gotten to that point of satisfaction? They come here and observe the entertainment just like I do...yes, finding a happy place for your sexuality makes you behave like an asexual, lol. Why do you think there are so many happy married couples not having sex? :D

I could get over my sexual issues but I'll still be highly distractible.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,157
Location: Adelaide, Australia

05 Jan 2018, 4:34 pm

MissChess wrote:
A woman who enjoys sex with many partners isn't simply dismissed because it's easy for her to achieve that activity. She is looked down on and reviled. She is insulted. She's a whore, a slut, a slag, not fit to meet a man's parents, not fit to be a wife, on and on it goes. This shrieking and clutching of pearls is heaped on her by both men and women.

Why? Most men like sex so why don't men like women who are more likely to give them sex?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
MissChess wrote:
A woman who enjoys sex with many partners isn't simply dismissed because it's easy for her to achieve that activity. She is looked down on and reviled. She is insulted. She's a whore, a slut, a slag, not fit to meet a man's parents, not fit to be a wife, on and on it goes. This shrieking and clutching of pearls is heaped on her by both men and women.

Why? Most men like sex so why don't men like women who are more likely to give them sex?

So,e men worry since she had so ,icy sex and such that she’d cheat on him when sex with him gets boring. And there’s women who feel they can’t be loyal to one man cause they want sex a lot and with many people.reddit has bunches of them, they worry they won’t be able to ever have a relationship cause they always want sex with many different guys. This trend of sexual freedom has its bad effects on both genders it seems.
I dont know what to tell such women. It’s a personal thing they probably need therapy. But I’m a real loyal person. I realize others aren’t and as such would have legit problems remaining loyal when they want to sex another person besides their spouse.

As for parents. Most parents are old fashioned and see sleeping around as bad. So they probably wouldn’t approve of a gf who slept around a lot. Such guys if they really love their gf should tell their Parents bug off.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

05 Jan 2018, 4:46 pm

sly279 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!

This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.

Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?

Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.


Pretty much.

I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.

I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.


What’s their background?

Most my coworkers have gf and wife’s. Half are young people going to college(jobs just extra income to put them through college, college = well paid future job, often women say eithe rhave wellmpaid job or be in college meaning college is just as good as well paid job because society says that’s what college leads to)
The other half are older people who have other full time jobs or are retired working this job for the extra money and discounts.

How many people,working low paid jobs are in college? It’s quite common. It’s why low paid jobs have high turn over. Most will graduate college and find better jobs then the next wave of college students will be hired. The few who don’t are people like me. And they single like me. Unless their women, there’s a few women who have well off bfs who pick them up or bought them a nice new car. They work to get discounts for their husband and extra income. There’s really not a lot of permanent low paid employees who’ve been in the same low paid job for 5-10 years who have relationships or are married. Unless they have other jobs or are just earning extra income in women’s case.
Litterally all the guys at my work are either college students or men in their 60+ besides the managers in their 40/50 but they get paid a lot more. They have degrees and experience this is their well paid job.

So how many of your fell employees are 27-40 old college failures who’ve been working min wage for 5-20 years and have gf and wives? Or how many are young college students with a future? Cause it amazes a huge difference to women finding them dateable vs seeing them as a loser.

Female coworkers rejected me but then partnered up with he college students. And they all leave eventually to better jobs.


Yeah, they're not college students.....


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

05 Jan 2018, 4:48 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
It's threads like this that make me feel lucky to be asexual.


Me too.

I can actually love and appreciate men and women for who they are as opposed to judging them on what they can give me.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 Jan 2018, 4:49 pm

MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.

There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.


There's many reasons for that, you cannot reasonably compare the two, it's not the same thing at all.

Many reasons for...what? Reasons that guys have sex with as many women as possible? Reasons why women have sex with as many guys as possible? Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales?

If you want to tell me I'm wrong, please do and I'll happily discuss it with you. I'm just not able to determine, from what you've written, exactly which statements you're disputing.




Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales.

Very many women can get sex very very easily, while only few guys can actually get sex easily. For guys, being very succesful is a requirement, or the small handful of guys who are just born incredibly handsome, but this percentage is very low: So in summary, for most guys it requires an incredible amount of work, or winning the genetic lottery to reach a place of easy access to sex. This is not the case for women. I would say probably 80-90 % of women could get sex easily, even if they were unemployed and broke.

Add to that, that even when the guy has the right foundation, it is still him who in 90% of cases has to initiate the conversation, be creative and charismatic to win over the woman. It is also still expected that the guy pays for eventual dates. There's a dissproportionate amount of effort and sacrifice, on every step of the way to the bedroom. It might be different for male moviestars and rockstars, but they are outliers to say the least, and it's not very useful to focus on something that only applies to 0.001% of all men.

So it is not so much having sex with the woman that is the achievement, it is all the hard work and achievements made to reach the point where the sex was even possible.
I know alot of you women will try to argue against what I'm saying here, but I think if you're completely honest with yourselves, you will agree that it is not the same, hence men get called studs, and women sluts. Not saying it's right or wrong, just exlaining why this is the case.

Interesting. I appreciate the clarification.

Yes, there's definitely a disconnect between the level of effort required for men vs. women to accumulate a large number of sexual partners. I have noted that many people put extra effort and attention into getting things that are more difficult for them to acquire, and sometimes wonder if the general perception that men want more sex/have a greater libido than women is due at least in part to that disparity. (If other words, in a society where men and women experienced sexual equality with regard to available partners and initiation of encounters, would men still want more sex than women?) I digress.

So if I understand you correctly, you're saying the reason men admire and envy other men who are more successful sexually is because of the awareness that they've had to work harder for it, while the same number of encounters is relatively easy for women to achieve and therefore not deserving of the same admiration. Yes?


Yep, you pretty much hit the nail on it's head.

So far, so good. What's missing in your interpretation, as far as I can tell, is the moral outrage that accompanies judgement of women who are sexually promiscuous.

A woman who enjoys sex with many partners isn't simply dismissed because it's easy for her to achieve that activity. She is looked down on and reviled. She is insulted. She's a whore, a slut, a slag, not fit to meet a man's parents, not fit to be a wife, on and on it goes. This shrieking and clutching of pearls is heaped on her by both men and women.

Yes, in the modern day we're more aware of the risks associated with sexual promiscuity, and I'm aware there's at least a fringe element beginning to judge men for this behavior as well - but there is not, nor has there been, any sort of parity in this arena.


How old are you?
A lot of younger girls are what my generation would call sluts, but for their generation it’s normal and cool. They brag about it to each other. I think slut will become a good word in their generation or the next. Words tend to do thst generation to generation. Being sexual promiscuous is cool for them. Ok for my generation and shunned by my parents generation. The baby boomers would send them to camps to be re-educated.

What I don’t get and is confusing is parents who tell their boys to go sleep around but forbit their daughters. Don’t they realize those girls are someone else’s daughters and someone else’s boy is being told to sleep with their daughter? And a saying I heard sleep around with sluts and get it out of your system but settle down with a good girl. Like wtf for real. That’s terrible advice or saying.



SIDWULF
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 111
Location: Vancouver

05 Jan 2018, 5:01 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
palaua wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Are you sure it’s that, there is no possibility that your personality and methods of interacting with people are unattractive? Can you explain why so many short, bald and overweight men seem to have families?

lol sly. No one needs to change their standards. It’s your problem they aren’t attracted to you, not theirs. Feminism is about the oppression and mistreatment of women. If someone doesn’t want to date you, they’re not mistreating you. No one owes someone else their attraction.

You like healthy weight women, right? You sexually prefer them? Women with feminine body shapes? It’s because it’s what biology dictates. Healthy women promote healthy offspring. You don’t have to be attracted to fat women if you’re not feeling it.

Biology dictates in women to go for good providers, strong men who protect and provide, negotiation and social authority which adds to that protection etc.

How exactly is it fair for you to be allowed to not feel anything for fat women, but it’s not okay for women to follow those biological instincts?

It really seems more like you are all butt hurt no one will have you so you blame the world. It’s the way it is. I’m not ideal for men, and I don’t expect them to change for me!! ! ! !


I'm not butthurt at all. I haven't been on any dating site nor even had a date for 2 years from now. I don't care anymore because it's all a big fuss about nothing but I see many of my male fellows suffer because of it and I'd highly advocate men to refuse dating women because it doesn't worth. Most women just use men for their money or status.

It's a lie that personality matters the most when it's looks.

Image

Racist guy still manages to get attention because of his looks

Image


I don’t think anyone is saying looks don’t matter. It, however, still does not explain the fact socially normal fat short and bald men still have plenty of luck. For men who are average looking, personality and confidence is everything, and they do get success.

What do you want people here to do? Tell you to get plastic surgery?


Do you not understand? Men can be racist or mysoginistic as long as they are good looking women will have sex with them. Women have secret rape fantasies and are okay being dominated by invasive species (economic migrant crisis). They have no loyalty to the tribe. It's the beta males who don't get away with anything. It's a form of control over average men.

Feminism is about controlling men!

Wake up.



MissChess
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 5 Dec 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 429
Location: the TARDIS

05 Jan 2018, 5:05 pm

SIDWULF wrote:
Do you not understand? Men can be racist or mysoginistic as long as they are good looking women will have sex with them. Women have secret rape fantasies and are okay being dominated by invasive species (economic migrant crisis). They have no loyalty to the tribe. It's the beta males who don't get away with anything. It's a form of control over average men.

Feminism is about controlling men!

Wake up.

Gosh, Sid, thanks so much for mansplaining that for me. (sarcasm)

Feminism, speaking as a feminist, is about no longer allowing men to control women.


_________________
~MissChess


MissChess
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 5 Dec 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 429
Location: the TARDIS

05 Jan 2018, 5:15 pm

sly279 wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.

There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.


There's many reasons for that, you cannot reasonably compare the two, it's not the same thing at all.

Many reasons for...what? Reasons that guys have sex with as many women as possible? Reasons why women have sex with as many guys as possible? Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales?

If you want to tell me I'm wrong, please do and I'll happily discuss it with you. I'm just not able to determine, from what you've written, exactly which statements you're disputing.




Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales.

Very many women can get sex very very easily, while only few guys can actually get sex easily. For guys, being very succesful is a requirement, or the small handful of guys who are just born incredibly handsome, but this percentage is very low: So in summary, for most guys it requires an incredible amount of work, or winning the genetic lottery to reach a place of easy access to sex. This is not the case for women. I would say probably 80-90 % of women could get sex easily, even if they were unemployed and broke.

Add to that, that even when the guy has the right foundation, it is still him who in 90% of cases has to initiate the conversation, be creative and charismatic to win over the woman. It is also still expected that the guy pays for eventual dates. There's a dissproportionate amount of effort and sacrifice, on every step of the way to the bedroom. It might be different for male moviestars and rockstars, but they are outliers to say the least, and it's not very useful to focus on something that only applies to 0.001% of all men.

So it is not so much having sex with the woman that is the achievement, it is all the hard work and achievements made to reach the point where the sex was even possible.
I know alot of you women will try to argue against what I'm saying here, but I think if you're completely honest with yourselves, you will agree that it is not the same, hence men get called studs, and women sluts. Not saying it's right or wrong, just exlaining why this is the case.

Interesting. I appreciate the clarification.

Yes, there's definitely a disconnect between the level of effort required for men vs. women to accumulate a large number of sexual partners. I have noted that many people put extra effort and attention into getting things that are more difficult for them to acquire, and sometimes wonder if the general perception that men want more sex/have a greater libido than women is due at least in part to that disparity. (If other words, in a society where men and women experienced sexual equality with regard to available partners and initiation of encounters, would men still want more sex than women?) I digress.

So if I understand you correctly, you're saying the reason men admire and envy other men who are more successful sexually is because of the awareness that they've had to work harder for it, while the same number of encounters is relatively easy for women to achieve and therefore not deserving of the same admiration. Yes?


Yep, you pretty much hit the nail on it's head.

So far, so good. What's missing in your interpretation, as far as I can tell, is the moral outrage that accompanies judgement of women who are sexually promiscuous.

A woman who enjoys sex with many partners isn't simply dismissed because it's easy for her to achieve that activity. She is looked down on and reviled. She is insulted. She's a whore, a slut, a slag, not fit to meet a man's parents, not fit to be a wife, on and on it goes. This shrieking and clutching of pearls is heaped on her by both men and women.

Yes, in the modern day we're more aware of the risks associated with sexual promiscuity, and I'm aware there's at least a fringe element beginning to judge men for this behavior as well - but there is not, nor has there been, any sort of parity in this arena.


How old are you?
A lot of younger girls are what my generation would call sluts, but for their generation it’s normal and cool. They brag about it to each other. I think slut will become a good word in their generation or the next. Words tend to do thst generation to generation. Being sexual promiscuous is cool for them. Ok for my generation and shunned by my parents generation. The baby boomers would send them to camps to be re-educated.

What I don’t get and is confusing is parents who tell their boys to go sleep around but forbit their daughters. Don’t they realize those girls are someone else’s daughters and someone else’s boy is being told to sleep with their daughter? And a saying I heard sleep around with sluts and get it out of your system but settle down with a good girl. Like wtf for real. That’s terrible advice or saying.

I'm fifty, so the attitudes to which I'm referring have been in place since the late 70s when I became aware of this general topic. (I'm not counting the 60s - I was alive then, but as a child didn't pay any mind to this subject.)

My oldest son is 25, so I've maintained some awareness of the changes in cultural norms through conversations with him and his friends. He's nearly engaged (has the ring, has not yet formally proposed) to a delightful young woman with whom he's living - they're both active duty military.

My youngest son is 16, so my education in cultural norms is ongoing. I've raised both my boys to be careful and considerate when it comes to sex and consent. As far as settling down, my advice to both continues to be this: don't marry the one you can imagine spending your life with. Marry the one you can't imagine spending your life without. Beyond that, I don't care if their partners are male, female, nonbinary, virgins, former hookers, whatever. (I do insist they be human, and I'd like grandchildren some day.)


_________________
~MissChess


palaua
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 18 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Moon

05 Jan 2018, 5:17 pm

SIDWULF wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
palaua wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Are you sure it’s that, there is no possibility that your personality and methods of interacting with people are unattractive? Can you explain why so many short, bald and overweight men seem to have families?

lol sly. No one needs to change their standards. It’s your problem they aren’t attracted to you, not theirs. Feminism is about the oppression and mistreatment of women. If someone doesn’t want to date you, they’re not mistreating you. No one owes someone else their attraction.

You like healthy weight women, right? You sexually prefer them? Women with feminine body shapes? It’s because it’s what biology dictates. Healthy women promote healthy offspring. You don’t have to be attracted to fat women if you’re not feeling it.

Biology dictates in women to go for good providers, strong men who protect and provide, negotiation and social authority which adds to that protection etc.

How exactly is it fair for you to be allowed to not feel anything for fat women, but it’s not okay for women to follow those biological instincts?

It really seems more like you are all butt hurt no one will have you so you blame the world. It’s the way it is. I’m not ideal for men, and I don’t expect them to change for me!! ! ! !


I'm not butthurt at all. I haven't been on any dating site nor even had a date for 2 years from now. I don't care anymore because it's all a big fuss about nothing but I see many of my male fellows suffer because of it and I'd highly advocate men to refuse dating women because it doesn't worth. Most women just use men for their money or status.

It's a lie that personality matters the most when it's looks.

Image

Racist guy still manages to get attention because of his looks

Image


I don’t think anyone is saying looks don’t matter. It, however, still does not explain the fact socially normal fat short and bald men still have plenty of luck. For men who are average looking, personality and confidence is everything, and they do get success.

What do you want people here to do? Tell you to get plastic surgery?


Do you not understand? Men can be racist or mysoginistic as long as they are good looking women will have sex with them. Women have secret rape fantasies and are okay being dominated by invasive species (economic migrant crisis). They have no loyalty to the tribe. It's the beta males who don't get away with anything. It's a form of control over average men.

Feminism is about controlling men!

Wake up.


props for having the skills to give a sarcastic response (that's rare for someone in the Autistic spectrum). I didn't claim that good looking men can get away with everything but they certainly have more freedom and ability to get away with more than normal or ba looking men.



palaua
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 18 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Moon

05 Jan 2018, 5:22 pm

MissChess wrote:
SIDWULF wrote:
Do you not understand? Men can be racist or mysoginistic as long as they are good looking women will have sex with them. Women have secret rape fantasies and are okay being dominated by invasive species (economic migrant crisis). They have no loyalty to the tribe. It's the beta males who don't get away with anything. It's a form of control over average men.

Feminism is about controlling men!

Wake up.

Gosh, Sid, thanks so much for mansplaining that for me. (sarcasm)

Feminism, speaking as a feminist, is about no longer allowing men to control women.


Don't take it as offense but your avatar seems to pretty much reflect what a lot feminists wish to be. Strong jawlined, masculine looking man wanna be types who give up their femininity and try to force the rest of society to reflect their agendas while over 90% of the female population don't associate themselves with feminist ideas in other words feminists reflect a small but loud, extremist minority.



Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

05 Jan 2018, 5:48 pm

To be honest, I’ve been thinking a lot about the endless stream of typically young guys who come in here to vent their frustrations with dating. I, as well as others have often tried to help them, but I have come to the conclusion that we shouldn’t.

If a person with a pervasive social development disorder who knows they have such a disorder posseses such a level of cognitive dissonance that have redefined normal and average to pertain to themselves rather than admit they are outliers to avoid facing the reality that normal average people are dating marrying and having sex in en mass, and they are not, by virtue of the fact that they are socially delayed alone, and their shortcomings are internal rather than external, these are individuals who, in their present mindset, lack the capacity to grow as people and should not be in relationships because they are not at a place where they would be able to Maintain one. They lack the necessary social fitness And few of them seem to never acquire it due to There in ability to Look them selves in the mirror and admit that they are not average and the problem is with them and not anyone else. While they are here trying to distort statistics To meet their comfortable delusion, the bulk of the human population is doing as it always did, having relationships marrying having sex and perpetuating the human species.



spaceone
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 68
Location: a rock in space

05 Jan 2018, 5:53 pm

Damn, you might be on to something there Chronos