QFT wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
the male form of the word (directed at males) is "unconventionally attractive." but i concede that is meant as more of a euphemism for homely.
Actually, when I learned that "homely" is a bad word, I learned it in context of describing men. In particular, I was reading the following article
https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archi ... py/277256/ and I read the quotes
Quote:
More than eight years after it first aired, the YouTube video of the skit still gets cited in online discussions of sexual harassment as "evidence" that our culture is deeply hostile to socially awkward and homely men.
as well as
Quote:
Others argue that "creepiness" connotes something specific: male homeliness.
What especially shocked me is that -- since the word "homeliness" implies comfort -- how can it possibly be creepy when creepy is the opposite of comfort? So now I have three different questions:
1. Why is homeliness unattractive on the first place? I thought it should be attractive
2. Why is someone who is unattractive perceived is creepy? Why would bad appearance imply bad behavior?
3. How can "homely" be "creepy" anyway? Homely = "comfort", creepy = "lack of comfort".
But in any case, back to what you were saying, apparently "homely" is being used negatively in case of men too, not just women -- as evident by that article.
In the United States, the word "homely" means ugly.
It doesn't matter what it means in England or anywhere else for that matter. If you live in the US, homely means ugly.
It's not that unattractive guys are inherently creepy. What's creepy is that they miss (or ignore) the sometimes obvious social cues that the target of their affection is not interested in their advances.
And yes, guys who are better looking are going to have an advantage. Human beings who are attractive have an advantage. If you aren't attractive you have to make up for it in other ways. That's life for both men and women.
_________________
That which does not kill us makes us stranger.