Am I mature for my age regarding preferences in girls/women?

Page 1 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Lukario
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 794
Location: Norway

21 Jun 2014, 4:49 pm

I'm a good-looking aspie who have been given a "facial rating" from 8-9 and I appreaciate curves more than the face on girls, I also think some personalities are attractive but hate certain personalities, and I'm 21, most guys my age seem to only care about face and (fake) boobs while I myself think mostly about ass and shape.



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

21 Jun 2014, 5:50 pm

:') :') :')



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

21 Jun 2014, 5:56 pm

mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

21 Jun 2014, 5:59 pm

You definitely aren't mature. Sorry.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

21 Jun 2014, 6:13 pm

I'd say you're pretty well normal for a 21 year old guy.

cathylynn wrote:
mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.


Says who?

I've never heard of any magical age where one matures or evolves what they're attracted to in a potential partner to not include aesthetics & only focus on personality. That's because this does not happen. Some people may change what they're attracted to, others won't. But there is no such rules that says maturity in attraction = valuing personality. Either you value personality more than looks or you don't. If there were such a rule in existence guys like Hugh Hefner would have changed to be attracted to the most ideal personalities to suit his tastes vs. surrounding himself with the physical bodies he's attracted to. Last I checked he's still surrounded by playboy bunnies.

Therefor your post is.. ridiculous.

Some people are attracted to certain aesthetic features and will always be that way, others not, but there is no sort of rule amongst humans that dictates that as people grow chronologically older that their tastes in others change from liking physical features to appreciating personality types. That's just nuts to believe so.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Azereiah
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 237

21 Jun 2014, 8:59 pm

In a word, "No."



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

21 Jun 2014, 10:03 pm

goldfish21 wrote:
I'd say you're pretty well normal for a 21 year old guy.

cathylynn wrote:
mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.


Says who?

I've never heard of any magical age where one matures or evolves what they're attracted to in a potential partner to not include aesthetics & only focus on personality. That's because this does not happen. Some people may change what they're attracted to, others won't. But there is no such rules that says maturity in attraction = valuing personality. Either you value personality more than looks or you don't. If there were such a rule in existence guys like Hugh Hefner would have changed to be attracted to the most ideal personalities to suit his tastes vs. surrounding himself with the physical bodies he's attracted to. Last I checked he's still surrounded by playboy bunnies.

Therefor your post is.. ridiculous.

Some people are attracted to certain aesthetic features and will always be that way, others not, but there is no sort of rule amongst humans that dictates that as people grow chronologically older that their tastes in others change from liking physical features to appreciating personality types. That's just nuts to believe so.


Pretty sure the guts of what that poster meant was there is more to people than tits 'n arse.



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

21 Jun 2014, 10:15 pm

goldfish21 wrote:
I'd say you're pretty well normal for a 21 year old guy.

cathylynn wrote:
mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.


Says who?

I've never heard of any magical age where one matures or evolves what they're attracted to in a potential partner to not include aesthetics & only focus on personality. That's because this does not happen. Some people may change what they're attracted to, others won't. But there is no such rules that says maturity in attraction = valuing personality. Either you value personality more than looks or you don't. If there were such a rule in existence guys like Hugh Hefner would have changed to be attracted to the most ideal personalities to suit his tastes vs. surrounding himself with the physical bodies he's attracted to. Last I checked he's still surrounded by playboy bunnies.

Therefor your post is.. ridiculous.

Some people are attracted to certain aesthetic features and will always be that way, others not, but there is no sort of rule amongst humans that dictates that as people grow chronologically older that their tastes in others change from liking physical features to appreciating personality types. That's just nuts to believe so.


hugh hefner never grew up. he didn't have to.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

21 Jun 2014, 10:15 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
I'd say you're pretty well normal for a 21 year old guy.

cathylynn wrote:
mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.


Says who?

I've never heard of any magical age where one matures or evolves what they're attracted to in a potential partner to not include aesthetics & only focus on personality. That's because this does not happen. Some people may change what they're attracted to, others won't. But there is no such rules that says maturity in attraction = valuing personality. Either you value personality more than looks or you don't. If there were such a rule in existence guys like Hugh Hefner would have changed to be attracted to the most ideal personalities to suit his tastes vs. surrounding himself with the physical bodies he's attracted to. Last I checked he's still surrounded by playboy bunnies.

Therefor your post is.. ridiculous.

Some people are attracted to certain aesthetic features and will always be that way, others not, but there is no sort of rule amongst humans that dictates that as people grow chronologically older that their tastes in others change from liking physical features to appreciating personality types. That's just nuts to believe so.


Pretty sure the guts of what that poster meant was there is more to people than tits 'n arse.


If they did mean that then you'd think they would have said so, no?

Instead they said what they wrote above, implying that as people mature they shift from being attracted to looks to being attracted to personality... and that's just straight up BS.

Sure, I'm attracted to the whole package of a person vs. looks alone, but I can't imagine ever not being attracted to looks and shifting to being attracted to personality above looks. I can't imagine growing older and looking at guys thinking "I wonder if he has a personality I'd be attracted to?" No. I'll do the same thing I've always done, see a guy I'm attracted to and think, "Cute."


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

21 Jun 2014, 10:20 pm

I think you're taking what they said too literally.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

21 Jun 2014, 10:30 pm

cathylynn wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
I'd say you're pretty well normal for a 21 year old guy.

cathylynn wrote:
mature would be valuing personality over looks altogether.


Says who?

I've never heard of any magical age where one matures or evolves what they're attracted to in a potential partner to not include aesthetics & only focus on personality. That's because this does not happen. Some people may change what they're attracted to, others won't. But there is no such rules that says maturity in attraction = valuing personality. Either you value personality more than looks or you don't. If there were such a rule in existence guys like Hugh Hefner would have changed to be attracted to the most ideal personalities to suit his tastes vs. surrounding himself with the physical bodies he's attracted to. Last I checked he's still surrounded by playboy bunnies.

Therefor your post is.. ridiculous.

Some people are attracted to certain aesthetic features and will always be that way, others not, but there is no sort of rule amongst humans that dictates that as people grow chronologically older that their tastes in others change from liking physical features to appreciating personality types. That's just nuts to believe so.


hugh hefner never grew up. he didn't have to.


Well I suppose you could call Hugh and I kindred Toys "R" Us spirits, then.

Excuse me while I'm off to Never Never Land with Peter & the lost boys while listening to Metallica and air-high-fiving Hugh for picking up another handful of hotties.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Lukario
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 794
Location: Norway

22 Jun 2014, 2:17 am

I don't think It's uncommon for guys up to 25 or something to drool over big tits and bonethin tanned blond dyed girls with empty personalities I don't get what's so good about it.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

22 Jun 2014, 2:39 am

whats wrong with liking a woman's face? o.O

never met anyone who said facial attraction isn't important. not the most important but being able to stare at them for years and like it is good yes? Its human nature, so I don't see fault in it. I wouldn't date someone just cause I find them pretty. I could have if I wanted to but personality and interests are important to me.


I don't get the whole big breasts thing, some can be scary actually.



Lukario
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 794
Location: Norway

22 Jun 2014, 3:28 am

I read a post in a thread here that one should be thankful for what one gets and I mostly agree I'm happy with around 90% of the girls I get with.



TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

22 Jun 2014, 5:06 am

hale_bopp wrote:
I think you're taking what they said too literally.
LOL most likely, but this should come as no surprise. We are in an Asperger's forum.

OP, from a personal standpoint you don't come across as socially mature. Your tastes might be of a mature nature but that doesn't always mean it makes one a mature person. Someone could have an educated love of wine, but still go to the pub every night racing down drink as fast as they can and spending their whole time thinking about who likes who and who is still their friend.

Would like to add that you have your whole life to be mature and that you shouldn't worry about what a bunch of people like us on some random forum think on the matter :) and BTW, curves rule.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

22 Jun 2014, 7:00 am

Lukario wrote:
most guys my age seem to only care about face and (fake) boobs while I myself think mostly about ass and shape.


Putting a paper-bag over their head before you f**k doesn't mean that you're mature.