Why are women so triggered by the friendzone?
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
But why is having a dependant partner worse than being a dependent partner? I don't see any rational explanation for this.
Most men can't afford to have such standard, btw. For example, in my age and income range there's hardly any women at all.
Why have a dependent partner period? Why does either partner have to be dependent? That's my point.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
For all you know he had a fat fetish and was happy to harpoon her.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I'm sure you have some statistics to support this notion.



https://www.rainn.org/statistics/crimin ... ice-system
You're right though, the criminal justice system is a joke when it comes to getting justice in these cases. One would be perfectly justified in castrating these animals or just killing them outright.
I don't know if you know this but "listen and believe" is not viable evidence. You and the court of public opinion might just assume every defendant is guilty without question, which is why it's good you're not a part of the justice system at least.
I don't assume every defendant is guilty, that's why we have the right to defend ourselves in court against accusations. You over-estimate the number of false accusations and ignore the number of cases that never proceed because it helps with your agenda of minimizing our concern over rape. I'm absolutely unconcerned with whether or not a rape that has occurred is able to be proven in a court of law - that's not the same as whether or not it occurred (just like if I rob you and skate because your lawyer failed to prove it adequately in court, I still robbed you.)
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
I think all those men movements should focus more on that part: men's standards had always been too low and forgiving when it comes to assets, we shall rise to women's levels. And also to promote the househusband/housebf role as well as an alternative life choice for men.
I like this idea.
What if the most compatible males for me already settled down with harpies, but won't leave for whatever reason. If they'd waited they could've had me instead
I'm 50% joking 50% serious lol.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I think all those men movements should focus more on that part: men's standards had always been too low and forgiving when it comes to assets, we shall rise to women's levels. And also to promote the househusband/housebf role as well as an alternative life choice for men.
I like this idea.
What if the most compatible males for me already settled down with harpies, but won't leave for whatever reason. If they'd waited they could've had me instead
I'm 50% joking 50% serious lol.
They realized moving to Iceland was involved and decided the hassle of harpies was less than the hassle of relocating.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
But why is having a dependant partner worse than being a dependent partner? I don't see any rational explanation for this.
Most men can't afford to have such standard, btw. For example, in my age and income range there's hardly any women at all.
Because covering your own costs on your own income is difficult enough without adding a dependent adult into the mix.
Resentment can occur as well if one person is doing all the work and the other gets to doss about.
Same goes for emotional work. If you're always the supportive one you'll burn out.
Yet men are expected to do so. Women will only date someone on their income level or above. So they won't accept a man who makes less but they find being a dependent to a man who makes more. Hypocrisy
The man who makes less makes due with his current income, so it's only when the woman makes him live her lyfstile that now he can't affford it and would become a dependent. Solution don't make him live your lifestyle or modify your lifestyle for the one you love. Men have been doing this for thousands of years for women, why can't women do it for men? Bet your grandmas was a dependent. If not her mom definitely was. Women have only been working since 1920ish, and only since the 50/60 has women become more and more independent job wise. On,y last 20 years have women now started becoming more well paid then a lot of men. The ration is switching. I'm the next 30 years I imagine women will be where men were in the 1950s. If women don't start accepting lower paid men then they won't find men and our society will start to die off. It's already happening, there's way more long term single people today then 20 years ago. Women impowerment is killing our society. What I do t understand is why it does have to, but if women won't change their dating requirements to match the new reality it won't. This isn't the 19050s anymore a man doesn't have to make as much or more then you. A man is worth more then his income, women are princesses. Men are princes. Love is worth more the a billion dollars. Or trillion
I'll n very marry or mov in with a lady, if I get a gf I'll probably have to break up at a year to two years if she doesn't before then.
My income is limited it'll always be so, they haven't raised social security in 40 ish years.
I get the same amountish someone on it would got in 1980. But back then 700 dollars was worth a lot more. So women will always see me as dependent, mooch, etc. I won't have that. I won't take gifts, rides, I won't stay at her place, I won't eat her food, I won't accept anything she offers besides love and companionship. I will spend whatever few money I have on her though. Eventually I'll get an apartment and she can come stay for week or so at time, she could do so at my house now.
I guess if you love the person you will make compromises.
That's the problem with online dating. There's no heart in it. It's a box checking exercise.
I know men who would rather be alone than support a woman. It's scary to give up security of your current life and add another perspective. I think people try and be a little logical about it. Money worries can add a lot of strain on a relationship.
I think you're more idealistic than the average person. Maybe you're too good and need someone less jaded than the average westerner. I imagine you with someone sweet and homely that likes to bake cookies. She'd make her own clothes and be thrifty, maybe have a little vegetable patch.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
I think all those men movements should focus more on that part: men's standards had always been too low and forgiving when it comes to assets, we shall rise to women's levels. And also to promote the househusband/housebf role as well as an alternative life choice for men.
I like this idea.
What if the most compatible males for me already settled down with harpies, but won't leave for whatever reason. If they'd waited they could've had me instead
I'm 50% joking 50% serious lol.
Some men may cheat, you know.
I think all those men movements should focus more on that part: men's standards had always been too low and forgiving when it comes to assets, we shall rise to women's levels. And also to promote the househusband/housebf role as well as an alternative life choice for men.
I keep telling similar things to guys. I tell them why women do somethings. They don't believe me, just laugh at me "they know women" alright most of them are not picky, they only want a model-looking girlfriend.
Sometimes I don't know what to think about this "men's standards had always been too low"
Is it because it is hard to get a "permanent p****"=they are being lazy, when they find and acceptable woman, they will put up with a lot of s**t
or
when a man falls in love, he loves deeper than a woman. He's got no hidden agenda.
Not sure about the househusband thing. I don't think it is for proper men. Aren't they the conquerors? Staying home seems to go against their nature.
But why is having a dependant partner worse than being a dependent partner? I don't see any rational explanation for this.
Most men can't afford to have such standard, btw. For example, in my age and income range there's hardly any women at all.
Because covering your own costs on your own income is difficult enough without adding a dependent adult into the mix.
Resentment can occur as well if one person is doing all the work and the other gets to doss about.
Same goes for emotional work. If you're always the supportive one you'll burn out.
Yet men are expected to do so. Women will only date someone on their income level or above. So they won't accept a man who makes less but they find being a dependent to a man who makes more. Hypocrisy
The man who makes less makes due with his current income, so it's only when the woman makes him live her lyfstile that now he can't affford it and would become a dependent. Solution don't make him live your lifestyle or modify your lifestyle for the one you love. Men have been doing this for thousands of years for women, why can't women do it for men? Bet your grandmas was a dependent. If not her mom definitely was. Women have only been working since 1920ish, and only since the 50/60 has women become more and more independent job wise. On,y last 20 years have women now started becoming more well paid then a lot of men. The ration is switching. I'm the next 30 years I imagine women will be where men were in the 1950s. If women don't start accepting lower paid men then they won't find men and our society will start to die off. It's already happening, there's way more long term single people today then 20 years ago. Women impowerment is killing our society. What I do t understand is why it does have to, but if women won't change their dating requirements to match the new reality it won't. This isn't the 19050s anymore a man doesn't have to make as much or more then you. A man is worth more then his income, women are princesses. Men are princes. Love is worth more the a billion dollars. Or trillion
I'll n very marry or mov in with a lady, if I get a gf I'll probably have to break up at a year to two years if she doesn't before then.
My income is limited it'll always be so, they haven't raised social security in 40 ish years.
I get the same amountish someone on it would got in 1980. But back then 700 dollars was worth a lot more. So women will always see me as dependent, mooch, etc. I won't have that. I won't take gifts, rides, I won't stay at her place, I won't eat her food, I won't accept anything she offers besides love and companionship. I will spend whatever few money I have on her though. Eventually I'll get an apartment and she can come stay for week or so at time, she could do so at my house now.
I guess if you love the person you will make compromises.
That's the problem with online dating. There's no heart in it. It's a box checking exercise.
I know men who would rather be alone than support a woman. It's scary to give up security of your current life and add another perspective. I think people try and be a little logical about it. Money worries can add a lot of strain on a relationship.
I think you're more idealistic than the average person. Maybe you're too good and need someone less jaded than the average westerner. I imagine you with someone sweet and homely that likes to bake cookies. She'd make her own clothes and be thrifty, maybe have a little vegetable patch.
That's the entire problem right there, idealism. I truly believe men are generally alot more idealistic when it comes to love, while women are generally more opportunistic. That's what breaks my heart, because I am incredibly(or used to be anyway)idealistic. I used to write poetry and stupid love songs.
The one time that really shattered my idealism was when I had a talk with my grandma. I used to look at my grandma as the one true example I had of a woman capable of idealistic love. My grandma and grandpa were together for 50 years, and always seemed like they had an unbreakable love for eachother. When my grandpa died, my grandma admitted to me that she had cheated on him several times... I couldn't believe it. So much for love..
My grandma is a cheater and a liar, so is my mom, my sister, my cousins, my ex girlfriends, my friends ex girlfriends...
Kind of hard to keep the idealistic torch lit.
Money being so awfully important equally breaks my heart. I am in college right now, but once I finish my degree I am fairly confident I'll be able to earn a decent living. I won't end up poor, that's not the issue. The issue is the thought, that if I that wasn't the case, then that makes me unloveable apparently. My degree is more important than who I am as a human being. That just makes me not care. If idealistic love cannot exist, then I don't want it at all.
The reality of love sounds like a f*****g bussiness transaction to me.
But anyways, I won't bother going on about this, it turns into a crossfire and we cannot have a reasonable discussion on this forum. I don't think anyone noticed, but I didn't ever throw insults at anyone here. But people find what I post offensive, and then use that as justification to throw insults my way. f*****g pathetic.
I am f*****g done.
Love is just a business transaction. Women are the boss and we're the applicants. They want a man with potential and income growth. If you get a good job that's just the start they'll want you to keep getting promotions and making more it's a investment. Tons of stuff online about women complaining their bf lacks ambition and isn't climbing the corporate ladder and his want to leave him. Not all women but it seems most. ![]()
The more cynical part of me says use them like they want to use you. If you get a good job date bunch of women never settling down. The idealist in me wants to believe in love but it doesn't exist. Mind you most women will trick themselves into believing they love you but it's really your money and status. You might find a good one though. Lots of women also complain they guy works all the time and thus cheat on him too. That's how you make good money you work all the time.
I dont know I have some mean ideas if I ever win the lottery, take them on a romantic date then show off my car and leave hem to pay lol ![]()
I guess if you love the person you will make compromises.
That's the problem with online dating. There's no heart in it. It's a box checking exercise.
I know men who would rather be alone than support a woman. It's scary to give up security of your current life and add another perspective. I think people try and be a little logical about it. Money worries can add a lot of strain on a relationship.
I think you're more idealistic than the average person. Maybe you're too good and need someone less jaded than the average westerner. I imagine you with someone sweet and homely that likes to bake cookies. She'd make her own clothes and be thrifty, maybe have a little vegetable patch.
It's not just online women box check offline too in fact all those women online exist in person too
Seems most men have n USA will gladly support a woman. Most do. I see them every day at work. Few of the female employees are stay at home wife's who got the job for the discount for their husbands.
Who doesn't have money worries? Besides the super rich.
I could bake her cookies and she could buy clothes. I'm not a hippy. I get clothes, I have some nice things. It's not a terrible life. May not have 3 new cars, vacation hous, boat, atvs and some horses but it's not bad life being poor. You can still have fun, eat out occasionally and have nice things. I could buy her some nice clothes at work even.
But i dont know like I said elsewhere I'll never have a long term relationship. Even if a girl wants one. At some point she'd want to get me gifts or do stuff for me. I won't take them or accept it
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
We got a little far off the nature and meaning of friend zone, didn't we? It seems like people base a lot of their views of this issue on personal feelings about their individual situation.
I think everyone could come together under the banner of: I've got problems, too! Instead, people prefer: you're the problem that's killing me! Ain't no way to unify under that.
The one time that really shattered my idealism was when I had a talk with my grandma. I used to look at my grandma as the one true example I had of a woman capable of idealistic love. My grandma and grandpa were together for 50 years, and always seemed like they had an unbreakable love for eachother. When my grandpa died, my grandma admitted to me that she had cheated on him several times... I couldn't believe it. So much for love..
My grandma is a cheater and a liar, so is my mom, my sister, my cousins, my ex girlfriends, my friends ex girlfriends...
Kind of hard to keep the idealistic torch lit.
Money being so awfully important equally breaks my heart. I am in college right now, but once I finish my degree I am fairly confident I'll be able to earn a decent living. I won't end up poor, that's not the issue. The issue is the thought, that if I that wasn't the case, then that makes me unloveable apparently. My degree is more important than who I am as a human being. That just makes me not care. If idealistic love cannot exist, then I don't want it at all.
The reality of love sounds like a f*****g bussiness transaction to me.
But anyways, I won't bother going on about this, it turns into a crossfire and we cannot have a reasonable discussion on this forum. I don't think anyone noticed, but I didn't ever throw insults at anyone here. But people find what I post offensive, and then use that as justification to throw insults my way. f*****g pathetic.
I am f*****g done.
The more cynical part of me says use them like they want to use you. If you get a good job date bunch of women never settling down. The idealist in me wants to believe in love but it doesn't exist. Mind you most women will trick themselves into believing they love you but it's really your money and status. You might find a good one though. Lots of women also complain they guy works all the time and thus cheat on him too. That's how you make good money you work all the time.
I dont know I have some mean ideas if I ever win the lottery, take them on a romantic date then show off my car and leave hem to pay lol
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
The more cynical part of me says use them like they want to use you. If you get a good job date bunch of women never settling down. The idealist in me wants to believe in love but it doesn't exist. Mind you most women will trick themselves into believing they love you but it's really your money and status. You might find a good one though. Lots of women also complain they guy works all the time and thus cheat on him too. That's how you make good money you work all the time.
I dont know I have some mean ideas if I ever win the lottery, take them on a romantic date then show off my car and leave hem to pay lol
So if you actually finally met someone interested in you, you would take them on a date and just ditch them...to get back at women who love money and status? Seems kind of self defeating....
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.
I think everyone could come together under the banner of: I've got problems, too! Instead, people prefer: you're the problem that's killing me! Ain't no way to unify under that.
The one time that really shattered my idealism was when I had a talk with my grandma. I used to look at my grandma as the one true example I had of a woman capable of idealistic love. My grandma and grandpa were together for 50 years, and always seemed like they had an unbreakable love for eachother. When my grandpa died, my grandma admitted to me that she had cheated on him several times... I couldn't believe it. So much for love..
My grandma is a cheater and a liar, so is my mom, my sister, my cousins, my ex girlfriends, my friends ex girlfriends...
Kind of hard to keep the idealistic torch lit.
Money being so awfully important equally breaks my heart. I am in college right now, but once I finish my degree I am fairly confident I'll be able to earn a decent living. I won't end up poor, that's not the issue. The issue is the thought, that if I that wasn't the case, then that makes me unloveable apparently. My degree is more important than who I am as a human being. That just makes me not care. If idealistic love cannot exist, then I don't want it at all.
The reality of love sounds like a f*****g bussiness transaction to me.
But anyways, I won't bother going on about this, it turns into a crossfire and we cannot have a reasonable discussion on this forum. I don't think anyone noticed, but I didn't ever throw insults at anyone here. But people find what I post offensive, and then use that as justification to throw insults my way. f*****g pathetic.
I am f*****g done.
The more cynical part of me says use them like they want to use you. If you get a good job date bunch of women never settling down. The idealist in me wants to believe in love but it doesn't exist. Mind you most women will trick themselves into believing they love you but it's really your money and status. You might find a good one though. Lots of women also complain they guy works all the time and thus cheat on him too. That's how you make good money you work all the time.
I dont know I have some mean ideas if I ever win the lottery, take them on a romantic date then show off my car and leave hem to pay lol
I don't care about unification, if it means we cannot discuss certain ideas. It would definitely please me if people would stop banging out personal attacks and acting smug about it though.
The more cynical part of me says use them like they want to use you. If you get a good job date bunch of women never settling down. The idealist in me wants to believe in love but it doesn't exist. Mind you most women will trick themselves into believing they love you but it's really your money and status. You might find a good one though. Lots of women also complain they guy works all the time and thus cheat on him too. That's how you make good money you work all the time.
I dont know I have some mean ideas if I ever win the lottery, take them on a romantic date then show off my car and leave hem to pay lol
So if you actually finally met someone interested in you, you would take them on a date and just ditch them...to get back at women who love money and status? Seems kind of self defeating....
I dont know and that only if I won the lottery which means they only datingnme cause then I'd have the house, car and Income. So suddenly getting intertest from women right after winning would be super supciious
Especially from the women who say don't message me unless you have car food hob and house. Don't think such women would deserve me and likely only see me as money.
I'd probably only take women who don't mention such things on real dates. They far more likely of having real love then one who requires status and money to love someone.
Non of that's going happen anyways and I'm too nice to do it it's just a mean fantasy I guess
Doesn't some part of you wish you could make those men who used you for sex know what it felt like?
Don't trust people who dislike you one day then like you suddenly when you have something they want. It's not real.
