Looks, Intellect, moral character, interests, personality?

Post Reply New Topic

I'm not talking to you, I'm talking to calandale. I already addressed your post. Thanks for the +1.

1: personality
2: intellect
3: interests
4: looks

Moral Character is a slippery, subjective term so I tend to avoid it. Heart is what really matters to me, if a woman was an ugly Forrest Gump with a good heart that would be enough for me. Though honestly I am not picky about sex, I'll date a guy or girl.

I thought you were storming off in a huff?

Bye! Enjoy the rest of your six pack!

Ah, I found it. Since this whole point wasn't
relevant to my own complaints, I had merely
skimmed, and such large blocks of text are
difficult for me to deal with, on screen.

I owe you an apology. There was indeed one
study which showed that women do not cheat
as often as men, cited in your article. The rest
seems to have been anecdotal evidence, trying
to show all these poor men, being cheated on,
for no reason whatsoever.

Hear! Hear!

There is no good reason to cheat. These feminists keep trying to pretend it's our fault that they can't keep their legs shut.

Also, you forget the other problem, that women today are often able to have innocent men thrown into prison under false allegations of rape. Without a very expensive lawyer (as in the duke lacrosse case) most men cannot get a fair trial when the plantiff is female. And for some reason these women never recieve jail time if they are discovered to have made the whole thing up.

This ability is not a tradeoff (contrary to what some people have tried to tell me). If you can throw anyone you want behind bars with no risk of being convicted yourself, what can't you do? There are many possibilities for blackmail.

Have fun finishing your ice cream Julie. I hope you choke on the spoon.

Huh? What ice cream?

That makes about as much sense as the rest of your babble.

And here I thought Aspies were supposed to be logical!

Hell, I was nearly tried even AGAINST her testimony,
when there was absolutely no physical evidence. Indeed,
had she not clearly told the judge that she would be a
witness on my behalf, I do believe that I'd have been
convicted.



Sometimes though, "making the whole thing up" is a matter
of pressure from others. It was in this case, and I'd damned
well have been pissed to see her have been charged for that.

(Post deleted because I didn't have all the information)

Last edited by V3N0M on 12 Aug 2007, 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

That was about DataSage drinking a six-pack. It's cross-referenced from another thread.

1. Intellect
2. Moral character
3. Personality
4. Looks
5. Interests

Threads like this are why I love Wrong Planet...I am not interested in looks much either....but most men are extremely shallow in my experience (albeit women moreso in different ways.)

For me it would be:
1. interests
2. moral character
3. personality
4. intellect
5. looks

One thing I don't get...people who get bored of sex with someone over time. I think that's just lack of creativity in the bedroom and shallow views on looks.

Hmm...

1. Moral Character
2. Personality (I feel 1 and 2 are sorta related)
3. Looks
4. Interests
5. Intellect

I could maybe flip them around somewhat, but I know looks would always be about in the middle, moral character highest, and intellect is fairly low on my priorities, as I don't expect a girl to argue about quantum physics with me or something. One thing I look for more than intellect in people is willingness to try new things, a person can be as smart as can be, but if they're unwilling to actually DO things and try things out and see if they work, it's useless smarts.