Page 9 of 16 [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 16  Next

DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

20 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm

J-Greens wrote:
civrev wrote:
You might try getting a pet then, they'll love you unconditionally and you don't need to worry about them going off and getting married to someone else.


Nice thought, and I have a pet anyway, but it's barely equal. Human contact. conversations all that, is what I need.


Yeah, there is no way in hell a pet can replace a human. There's many reasons why not, but one of the bigger ones is pets don't live long anyway. I mean a dog is lucky to live 12 years or so. Same with a cat. Pets love unconditionally? Coulda fooled me. A lot of people I know with pets have had them run away and not come back.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


civrev
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jul 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 90

21 Oct 2012, 3:30 am

Taverson wrote:
I've known several people (mostly friends of friends) that are happier about being single when they get a pet and because of that aren't worried so much about getting into a relationship. And it usually worked out for them later on when they felt they could afford to be "picky". Many of them are still happily married.

As for the unconditionally, you're thinking of dogs. Not cats (whom I adore as opposed to dogs).


Well it's hard to say since we can't ask animals, but generally even cats come back to you after they've been angry with you for a while.

J-Greens wrote:
Nice thought, and I have a pet anyway, but it's barely equal. Human contact. conversations all that, is what I need.


Friends and/or family generally help fill that void. You have conversations on this very forum. :)

DialAForAwesome wrote:
Yeah, there is no way in hell a pet can replace a human. There's many reasons why not, but one of the bigger ones is pets don't live long anyway. I mean a dog is lucky to live 12 years or so. Same with a cat. Pets love unconditionally? Coulda fooled me. A lot of people I know with pets have had them run away and not come back.


There are some pets that'll live longer. Get a Tortoise, it'll live longer than you AND it won't run away(unless you let it go). Animals aren't necessarily the brightest creatures though, running off has nothing to do with their love.



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,210
Location: California, United States

21 Oct 2012, 12:39 pm

mds_02 wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
not sure, but something tells me Yes I would, because I would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all, I just want to finally end the single streak, get the monkey off my back


Don't let loneliness turn you into that guy. I can tell you from experience that being single is definitely preferable to finding out, years in, that the person you love and trust doesn't love you back.


i still would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all


Loved and lost; sure. Loved and betrayed, publically humiliated, made to feel like half a man then, finally, abandoned; not so much.

Loneliness is awful. It's hell. But the worst part about it is the lengths people will go to to alleviate it. The terrible people they'll allow into their lives, the mistreatment they'll tolerate because they think that any attention is better than none.


hate how we guys almost always have to initiate



DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,467

21 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm

J-Greens wrote:
DerStadtschutz wrote:
You'll learn someday. The trouble is, it won't happen until you've had your heart broken, and then you'll wish you'd listened. The point of dating/marrying someone is to be with someone who makes you happy; someone you can truly love. There's no love if someone's getting used or otherwise treated like sh**. And having your heart broken is one of the most painful experiences in life... At least it was for me.


Have you ever heard of unrequited love?
Watching that person get married to somebody else, or become pregnant, knowing that you still love them regardless?
I'd rather take a week of any love going, than to keep on going without.


No, not at all. Every single female I've ever desired just fell right into my hands... What kind of question is that? Also, I'm curious here, but when you say you LOVE this person, have you ever actually had any sort of relationship with her, or did you lust after her from afar? Because the latter is not love. You can't love someone you don't truly even know. Also, digging thru her garbage to get to "know" her doesn't count either... not that I'm suggesting that's what you did, I'm just saying. I don't know your specific situation.



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,210
Location: California, United States

21 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm

DerStadtschutz wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
not sure, but something tells me Yes I would, because I would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all, I just want to finally end the single streak, get the monkey off my back


Don't let loneliness turn you into that guy. I can tell you from experience that being single is definitely preferable to finding out, years in, that the person you love and trust doesn't love you back.


i still would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all


You'll learn someday. The trouble is, it won't happen until you've had your heart broken, and then you'll wish you'd listened. The point of dating/marrying someone is to be with someone who makes you happy; someone you can truly love. There's no love if someone's getting used or otherwise treated like sh**. And having your heart broken is one of the most painful experiences in life... At least it was for me.


i hate how it is far important for guys to be secure, comfortable and content with themselves while being single than it is for girls



DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

21 Oct 2012, 3:16 pm

civrev wrote:
DialAForAwesome wrote:
Yeah, there is no way in hell a pet can replace a human. There's many reasons why not, but one of the bigger ones is pets don't live long anyway. I mean a dog is lucky to live 12 years or so. Same with a cat. Pets love unconditionally? Coulda fooled me. A lot of people I know with pets have had them run away and not come back.


There are some pets that'll live longer. Get a Tortoise, it'll live longer than you AND it won't run away(unless you let it go). Animals aren't necessarily the brightest creatures though, running off has nothing to do with their love.


Good point. :lol: I think a turtle would be about the only pet I would want, but it's still not better than human relationships. IMO. Although turtles are cute.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

21 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm

wow. This thread got interesting.
1- was not about me dating a mean hot girl it was trying to find out if men would keep dating a rude hot women
similiar to women who keep dating a confidence good looking a**hole
2- I said ''b***h'' yeah, so. to wiggins or any women who got offended by it. what would you do if
you had a female friend that start out nice but then turn on you, made fun of you, and spread
nasty rumors of you. Would you think highly of that former female friend.

So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.



DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,467

21 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm

WantToHaveALife wrote:
DerStadtschutz wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
not sure, but something tells me Yes I would, because I would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all, I just want to finally end the single streak, get the monkey off my back


Don't let loneliness turn you into that guy. I can tell you from experience that being single is definitely preferable to finding out, years in, that the person you love and trust doesn't love you back.


i still would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all


You'll learn someday. The trouble is, it won't happen until you've had your heart broken, and then you'll wish you'd listened. The point of dating/marrying someone is to be with someone who makes you happy; someone you can truly love. There's no love if someone's getting used or otherwise treated like sh**. And having your heart broken is one of the most painful experiences in life... At least it was for me.


i hate how it is far important for guys to be secure, comfortable and content with themselves while being single than it is for girls


I'm not telling you to be content with being single. I'm telling you to not be content being with a crazy biatch who doesn't really love you. If your options are be single or be with someone who doesn't really care about you, you ARE better off being single and should be content knowing that fact. That doesn't mean you shouldn't desire a girlfriend or seek one out.

Also, I think you're wrong here, because I hear this type of advice given to women much more often than men... Usually it's women who are prone to entering into abusive relationships out of fear of just being alone.



DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,467

21 Oct 2012, 3:50 pm

billiscool wrote:

So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.


Congratulations, you got it now! Welcome to Feminism's version of "equality."



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,210
Location: California, United States

21 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm

and i don't get why too many people argue for saying that men have life easier than women



Lilya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,600
Location: Finland

21 Oct 2012, 3:59 pm

DerStadtschutz wrote:
billiscool wrote:

So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.


Congratulations, you got it now! Welcome to Feminism's version of "equality."


Stad, I've been a fan of a lot of your posts, but I have to say your war against feminism is disturbing.


_________________
It's not the sinful, but the stupid who are our shame - Oscar Wilde


MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

21 Oct 2012, 4:00 pm

Lilya wrote:
DerStadtschutz wrote:
billiscool wrote:

So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.


Congratulations, you got it now! Welcome to Feminism's version of "equality."


Stad, I've been a fan of a lot of your posts, but I have to say your war against feminism is disturbing.


he is against feminism as a women being superior thought. but his posts have shown he firmly believes in true equality, not manufactured equality



Lilya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,600
Location: Finland

21 Oct 2012, 5:01 pm

MXH wrote:
Lilya wrote:
DerStadtschutz wrote:
billiscool wrote:

So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.


Congratulations, you got it now! Welcome to Feminism's version of "equality."


Stad, I've been a fan of a lot of your posts, but I have to say your war against feminism is disturbing.


he is against feminism as a women being superior thought. but his posts have shown he firmly believes in true equality, not manufactured equality


Feminism is about equality, not a debate about superiority of either sex. I wish people (especially on this thread) understood it and would stop fueling pointless arguing that makes none feel good nor offers any help.


_________________
It's not the sinful, but the stupid who are our shame - Oscar Wilde


DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

21 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm

billiscool wrote:
So a man can't call a women a ''b***h'' if she rude to him and shows no respect to him
but a woman can call a man a ''creep'' because he approach her and is ugly or just socialy akward.


Puh-reeeeeetty much, yeah. And there's not a damn thing we can do about it either.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,210
Location: California, United States

21 Oct 2012, 7:29 pm

DerStadtschutz wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
DerStadtschutz wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
WantToHaveALife wrote:
not sure, but something tells me Yes I would, because I would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all, I just want to finally end the single streak, get the monkey off my back


Don't let loneliness turn you into that guy. I can tell you from experience that being single is definitely preferable to finding out, years in, that the person you love and trust doesn't love you back.


i still would rather have loved and lost than to never have loved at all


You'll learn someday. The trouble is, it won't happen until you've had your heart broken, and then you'll wish you'd listened. The point of dating/marrying someone is to be with someone who makes you happy; someone you can truly love. There's no love if someone's getting used or otherwise treated like sh**. And having your heart broken is one of the most painful experiences in life... At least it was for me.


i hate how it is far important for guys to be secure, comfortable and content with themselves while being single than it is for girls


I'm not telling you to be content with being single. I'm telling you to not be content being with a crazy biatch who doesn't really love you. If your options are be single or be with someone who doesn't really care about you, you ARE better off being single and should be content knowing that fact. That doesn't mean you shouldn't desire a girlfriend or seek one out.

Also, I think you're wrong here, because I hear this type of advice given to women much more often than men... Usually it's women who are prone to entering into abusive relationships out of fear of just being alone.


i would rather be in a bad, negative relationship than to not be in any relationship at all just to get the experience



BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

21 Oct 2012, 7:38 pm

Lilya wrote:
Feminism is about equality, not a debate about superiority of either sex.

That may be what it's supposed to be but very rarely is.