Board index › Coping in life › Love and Dating

Why Some People Wind Up Becoming 30 Year Old Virgins

Page 10 of 13 [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,800
Location: the island of defective toy santas

06 Jul 2022, 8:02 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I can’t “go all the way” any longer without Viagra.

But I can still satisfy a woman in other ways.

If a woman can’t understand that, and requires only PIV sex, then what can I say?

if you don't mind the question, why not use viagra then?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

06 Jul 2022, 8:47 am

I dont like taking medication if I don’t have to take it.



SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 26
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

06 Jul 2022, 1:23 pm

cyberdad wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I have mentioned before that government funded sex therapy is an option for young men who want to have a normal sex life (that should be a right for all people) but have been deprived due to circumstances out of their control.

I think health authorities underestimate the benefit that sex therapy would provide to young men, I suspect it's a hell of a lot more effective that stupid crap like counselling.


Why the focus on men? If it would benefit young men in that boat, wouldn't it be likely to benefit others in that boat as well?


Oh of course any service for men should be open to all genders.

"service for men"? Besides circular argument, how did this come about?


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Show Spoiler
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,538
Location: Right over your left shoulder

06 Jul 2022, 1:56 pm

ironpony wrote:
Oh I apologize, I did not mean to offend anyone.


The bigger issue is that it's a topic that's been done to death and debunked both from the perspective of how it plays out on the individual level but also why it's inherently insulting, given that former part.

Certain lines of reasoning/topics/takes get shut down immediately with no further discussion because they've been settled long ago and don't need readdressed over and over again unless some sort of drastic changes establish themselves.

It's worse when those incorrect statements are made as though they're commonsense facts, in the past not shutting them down led to posters getting piledriven with responses picking their statement apart and topics would get hijacked. It puts mods in a position of having to euthanize the thread before the terminal disease progresses.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


ironpony
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Nov 2015
Age: 40
Posts: 5,590
Location: canada

06 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
ironpony wrote:
Oh I apologize, I did not mean to offend anyone.


The bigger issue is that it's a topic that's been done to death and debunked both from the perspective of how it plays out on the individual level but also why it's inherently insulting, given that former part.

Certain lines of reasoning/topics/takes get shut down immediately with no further discussion because they've been settled long ago and don't need readdressed over and over again unless some sort of drastic changes establish themselves.

It's worse when those incorrect statements are made as though they're commonsense facts, in the past not shutting them down led to posters getting piledriven with responses picking their statement apart and topics would get hijacked. It puts mods in a position of having to euthanize the thread before the terminal disease progresses.


Oh you mean the topic about how it's easier for women to get sex compared to men? Sorry about that, I was just trying to make a certain point on a certain part of the topic. I will try to stay on topic.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,800
Location: the island of defective toy santas

06 Jul 2022, 6:47 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I dont like taking medication if I don’t have to take it.

neether do i but i do have to take it.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Jul 2022, 6:54 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I have mentioned before that government funded sex therapy is an option for young men who want to have a normal sex life (that should be a right for all people) but have been deprived due to circumstances out of their control.

I think health authorities underestimate the benefit that sex therapy would provide to young men, I suspect it's a hell of a lot more effective that stupid crap like counselling.


Why the focus on men? If it would benefit young men in that boat, wouldn't it be likely to benefit others in that boat as well?


Oh of course any service for men should be open to all genders.

"service for men"? Besides circular argument, how did this come about?


The basic premise is anyone who wants to have sex but due to circumstances out of their control are unable to find a partner should have access to government support to have regular sex therapy to be happy and fulfilled. To me this is no different to
remedial massage
counselling
hair cut
dentist



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
ironpony wrote:
Oh I apologize, I did not mean to offend anyone.


The bigger issue is that it's a topic that's been done to death and debunked both from the perspective of how it plays out on the individual level but also why it's inherently insulting, given that former part.

Certain lines of reasoning/topics/takes get shut down immediately with no further discussion because they've been settled long ago and don't need readdressed over and over again unless some sort of drastic changes establish themselves.

It's worse when those incorrect statements are made as though they're commonsense facts, in the past not shutting them down led to posters getting piledriven with responses picking their statement apart and topics would get hijacked. It puts mods in a position of having to euthanize the thread before the terminal disease progresses.


I don't think he mean't any harm. A lot of heterosexual males are conditioned to think in a particular way. Ironpony has tried his best to auto-correct himself and apologised.



ironpony
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Nov 2015
Age: 40
Posts: 5,590
Location: canada

06 Jul 2022, 7:33 pm

Can someone tell me what I said that was offensive? I don't mean to sound ignorant, I just want to know what emotion I caused, just so I know the situation :).



SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 26
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

06 Jul 2022, 7:39 pm

cyberdad wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
I have mentioned before that government funded sex therapy is an option for young men who want to have a normal sex life (that should be a right for all people) but have been deprived due to circumstances out of their control.

I think health authorities underestimate the benefit that sex therapy would provide to young men, I suspect it's a hell of a lot more effective that stupid crap like counselling.


Why the focus on men? If it would benefit young men in that boat, wouldn't it be likely to benefit others in that boat as well?


Oh of course any service for men should be open to all genders.

"service for men"? Besides circular argument, how did this come about?


The basic premise is anyone who wants to have sex but due to circumstances out of their control are unable to find a partner should have access to government support to have regular sex therapy to be happy and fulfilled.

So how does this relate to "for men"?


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Show Spoiler
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,800
Location: the island of defective toy santas

06 Jul 2022, 7:40 pm

some folks don't want to be reminded of society's failings or hear criticism of societal flaws that they deem as useful features to themselves and their tribe.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Jul 2022, 7:57 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
So how does this relate to "for men"?


men and/or other genders



SkinnedWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2022
Age: 26
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,538
Location: China

06 Jul 2022, 7:59 pm

cyberdad wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
So how does this relate to "for men"?

men and/or other genders

How does this relate to gender?
Health care is not provided to any citizen?


_________________
With the help of translation software.

Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.

You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Show Spoiler
Dance with me, funeralxempire. Into night's circle we fly, until the fire enjoys us.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Jul 2022, 8:01 pm

ironpony wrote:
Can someone tell me what I said that was offensive? I don't mean to sound ignorant, I just want to know what emotion I caused, just so I know the situation :).


I'm just taking a punt but its unfair to say women have it easier to have sex when this is an autism forum and many of the women here are equally facing obstacles to finding love like men. It's just the men here complain more.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,538
Location: Right over your left shoulder

06 Jul 2022, 8:01 pm

cyberdad wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
So how does this relate to "for men"?


men and/or other genders


Which is to say 'people', which would have avoided the issue from the get-go.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Jul 2022, 8:03 pm

SkinnedWolf wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
SkinnedWolf wrote:
So how does this relate to "for men"?

men and/or other genders

How does this relate to gender?
Health care is not provided to any citizen?


Oh sorry, I think my point was lost in translation. Sex therapy should be available to any citizen regardless of gender.