Does "dating" just mean "sex"?

Post Reply New Topic

Heh. I would consider dating to be pretty much anything outside the scope of a normal platonic relationship prior to engagement.

It's kind of hard to describe, but dating would probably mean that there is a mutual romantic bond between two people. Now whether or not sex is involved is another story, but generally things like kissing, cuddling, and other romantic displays of affection that would not occur between two who were just "friends".

The way I see it, there's a hiearchy to relationships:

Uknown < Casual Accquaintences < Friends < Close Friends < Dating < Engaged < Married

But I haven't really had THAT much experience. I've only been in 3 relationships before (including my current one), and all three of them involved sex sometime shortly after advancing to the "dating stage". (Ok, I'm going to shut up about my philosophy now that it's starting to sound like something ripped from the Shin Megami Tensei: Persona series.)

I've dated a few people and we never ended up having sex, but there was always an understanding at the beginning of the relationship. Either it would lead to sex at some point, it would lead to sex if we got married, etc. You said he knew you were asexual at the beginning of your relationship, but are you sure he knows what asexual means, and what it means for you?

I know the biological meaning of asexual. It's an organism that doesn't use sex to reproduce. What does it mean in human context? I'm assuming it means you're disgusted by all intimate contact and avoid everybody. Is that remotely close?

I think you can have a romantic relationship w/o actual physical sex being involved. What love means and what are the best ways to express love differ from person to person. For some people physical intimacy is very important, and for some less. Ultimately, this is something that has to be decided by the two people in the relationship. There are no rules other than the ones we have made up ourselves, and our perceptions of what those rules are differ. If physical intimacy is very important to him, then you might consider whether you love him enough to give and receive this kind of affection even though you don't particularly enjoy it. By contrast, he has to decide whether he loves you enough to be with you even though you'll never want to give as much physical affection as he does.

Ultimately, if you want a non-sexual partner relationship, you can find one, but probably not with this guy. In my personal opinion, it may be best for both of you to realize that the gap between your ideas of what love means is too large to be overcome, and part ways amicably, before you both end up in a very miserable situation. The fact that he and you have very different needs in a relationship isn't going to change, and accommodating each other will get more difficult as time passes. This, to me, is a lifestyle compatibility issue, not altogether different from a highly introverted person dating a highly extroverted person. There will be a constant tension in the relationship between one partner who wants one amount of socialization and the other partner that wants another. Lifestyle compatibility is the first thing I look at when I am considering potential partners. I could agree with a girl on everything under the sun, watch the same TV shows, same movies, have the same sense of humor, etc., but if she wants to go out and get drunk with friends or go clubbing and dancing every weekend, it's not going to work.

It's more than that but sex is just a bonus.

Damn, this guy brought it up during the first week?
Hopefully he's not interested only for the sex, but lots of guys could be like that.

Well, regardless of what we think of sex, bringing that up on the first week is just.... wrong and makes that guy look totally superfluous.
To me, even if we say we are asexual, sexual encounters with your romantic partner may happen, why not... you may not like being touched, and such, but who knows if one day you feel like you want to have it, or a special moment... don't just close your doors radically. BUT what that guy did on the first week is really wrong and if I was in your position I would think that's the only thing he wants, otherwise why would he hurry? he can masturbate to release sexual tension.

I think culturally we place the wrong kind of emphasis on "dating." It used to be that dating meant a girl could "go out" with any number of guys week after week, get to know the guys, let the parents meet them, and so on. "Going out on a date" doesn't necessarily have to denote any kind of commitment or obligation. It seems the word "date" has gone from referring to "hanging out" to meaning "relationship."

I'll be honest: When it comes to women and relationships, sex is something that is going to be important with me. If I were to go out with a girl a few times, I would be up front and honest that sex is something that I would eventually expect and if she can't handle that, we don't need to let the relationship go any further--just agree to "just be friends" or acquaintances while we still CAN be "just friends."

Similarly, girls who can't/won't be sexually involved with guys really need to be up front about it. It may cost you a relationship, but at the same time not EVERY guy out there is that interested in sex. If you give up a poisonous relationship full of unpleasant or unrealistic expectations, you might just find a perfect fit in someone else.

Kind of wondering why him wanting sex is a problem.... Most couples do have sex.

If you are asexual or uninterested in sex, I think you should let him know that, and probably end it. It's not fair to string someone along, and I'm sure you don't want to be in a relationship where you are constantly being pressured to do something you are not comfortable with -- there are plenty of other girls who will, if you won't, so it's not a lost cause for him.