how important are looks to you in a partner?

Page 2 of 11 [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

14 Feb 2011, 1:28 am

astaut wrote:
Looks aren't important to me, whether I'm physically attracted to them is important.

If a guy is really good-looking by society's standards but I don't feel attraction to him, his looks are useless. There's been guys I wasn't attracted to at first but I found them to be physically attractive as I got to know them.


This, this, so much this.



sterfry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,048
Location: Western NY

14 Feb 2011, 1:48 am

Looks certainly aren't everything but there should be a minimal level of physical attraction. I think my perception of physical attractiveness is lifted by other characteristics involved with the personality.



Mark198423
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,974
Location: Salford, England

14 Feb 2011, 4:45 am

Looks have a significant role in whether I'm attracted to someone, particularly at the start. I don't tend to only be into classically hot girls though - they need to be attractive to me, not society. Someone can make themselves ugly very quickly with certain actions too.



r_a_n_d_o_m
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 160

14 Feb 2011, 5:30 am

id rather have someone with a brain. but personal taste does come into play, my big turn off is fat women. i understand they have a mind and are a person just like everyone else but if im not sexually attracted to them whats the point. you could be a rocket scientist with personality for days but thats only half of a relationship.



emlion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,641

14 Feb 2011, 5:43 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Not that important.

I'd rather be dead than date a shallow boring useless ars*hole.


QFT.



Gremmie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 914
Location: England

14 Feb 2011, 6:26 am

Being attracted to someone is very important. I'm not sure how much of attraction is just looks based for me and how much it's affected other aspects of someone's behaviour and personality. Generally I'm interested in the geeky guys anyway - the male model look just feels very bland and empty so does nothing for me at all.



roadGames
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 401

14 Feb 2011, 6:55 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Not that important.

I'd rather be dead than date a shallow boring useless ars*hole.


A lot of women say this, but then boom, they're dating some tall, square jawed pretty boy. They'll attribute reasons like his personality and confidence as to why they like him, but in the end, they're dating him because he's sexy. These guys can get away with so much more in relationships (infidelity, emotional distance, lack of a career, mental problems, etc) and can be far, far more direct when they're trying to get with a girl initially.

This is how I think it works: depending on the girl's self-esteem (especially body image), girls seek to date guys whose actual physical attractiveness matches or exceeds the girl's perceived attractiveness of herself. Gorgeous girls with low self-esteem end up with men that are not classically handsome because they feel a classically handsome man will leave them quickly for another woman when they meet one with less mental issues than her. However, they're still physically attracted to these classically handsome guys. If the classically handsome guy reveals some vulnerabilities, he can lower the girl's defenses and maybe date her until some girl with higher self-esteem comes around.

Not to toot my own horn, but a girl with model looks that I dated for a while did not consider getting with me until she saw me in a depressed state where I was kind of dressed down. Honestly, I feel like that's kind of insidious. She dated me because I seemed vulnerable and wasn't the "psychological juggernaut" she first met. Why would you ever want to date someone that seemed weak and vulnerable unless you were a kind of a predator yourself???

Here's another ridiculous example. At the beginning of the semester, I dated a girl for a few weeks that only appeared to be actually interested in me after I revealed to her that I've been on prozac for 11 years and have suicidal ideations every now and then. What the hell? Talking about depression/being a downer is supposed to be the key way to get a girl (or anybody, haha) to not like you. I literally told her that I thought sadness was the most profound emotion and that I enjoyed making myself sad sometimes. We had sex on the first date shortly after I talked about science, depression, and suicide (I hate sex on the first date, she got me so drunk/high that I'd be down to do anything!).

The current girl also knows about my OCD and depression issues, and I let her know about them on first date. She wants to hang out again tonight, obviously to try to hookup.

All of these girls are really pretty and do not give a crap about my rotten personality, haha. I guess I'm a romantic and really affectionate? I can't think of anything besides physical attraction which would make them want to date me (again, not tooting my own horn, these girls have low thresholds for what turns them on, lol).

Now, I'm not implying that you are one of these girls, hale_bopp, but I'm telling you right now what you're talking about is very, very rare. It wouldn't surprise me that someone with Asperger's wouldn't use looks as a heavily weighted criterion. My most heavily weighted criterions after looks are being a good listener, being a very empathic person, and being very affectionate. I fall in love with girls I can tell love me. It's like a spell. They don't have to be extremely attractive. Being pretty helps, but so long as a girl is slender, takes care of herself, and obviously loves me, I'll take her over a girl that looked like my ex girlfriend. I mean, she's gotta have some interesting things to say and be able to engage my mind, but really, kindness and a need (not neediness per se) for me in their lives is a huge deal to me. So, I guess I have some weird criterion, too. It definitely ties into my self-esteem being low and requiring someone with a gentle touch.



emlion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,641

14 Feb 2011, 6:58 am

Quote:
A lot of women say this, but then boom, they're dating some tall, square jawed pretty boy. They'll attribute reasons like his personality and confidence as to why they like him, but in the end, they're dating him because he's sexy.


I stopped reading after this.
It's awesome how you know what all women think!



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Feb 2011, 7:00 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Chronos wrote:
Space wrote:
I love "hot" girls... My dilemma is I have never had luck getting them! This is odd in a way, because I would consider myself to be a good match for a "hot" girl. I'm 6"2, muscular, nice eyes, have a well paying job, etc. I still have the AS downfalls though, and don't have many NT friends (so this probably affects my chances too).

I used to only want to date really attractive women, but I lowered my standards quite a bit so that I could actually get a woman. I'm not saying bad looking per-se, but average, and a few chubby women, "bigger", etc.

Right now I have a pretty cool NT girlfriend. She's 25, very intelligent (in her last year of veterinary medicine), and is not prudish (she loves sex). She is attractive, but definitely not one of the "hot" girls. Basically, she is looks-wise a good looking girl who is a bit bigger and could lose some weight.

My problem is, after all these years of no women and I finally get a girl who I can connect with on some level and wants to be with me, I still want a better looking one. Insane, isn't it?

How important are looks to you in your partner?


I think it's important that one be physically attracted to their partner, at least initially, and I don't think you should be with someone you aren't really attracted to, or would leave for someone who is more attractive. It's not really fair to either of you.

On the subject of "hotness" and women, much of what most men consider to be hot, the woman pays a good deal of money on and it takes her two hours to apply that "hotness" in the morning.

In other words, that which you are judging a woman to be hot by, is typically makeup, hair style, and clothing, even if you don't realize this. Often, men pass up what are actually quite pretty women, if they are not made up in a form they can recognize as hot.
This is kind of silly, because any woman can get made up.

Modeling agencies realize this, and so when recruiting, generally want to see women without their makeup on or hair styled. They generally choose tall women with symmetrical and well proportioned features, and clear skin.

Here's an example of models with and without makeup.
http://www.femininebeauty.info/fashion- ... ans-makeup

Here's Mariah Carey without makeup.
http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/20 ... s-picture/

So you see, most hotness is an illusion when it comes to women.


Bingo. A lot of men are extremely ignorant to this. A lot of men think girls get out of bed in the morning with pretty clothes, fake tan, jewellery, straightened and blow waved hair, and makeup.

I see one guy say "I don't like girls who wear make up"

And the next second he's drooling over a girl who is caked in makeup and dressups, yet he thinks she's "not wearing makeup".

I can use my flat mate for example. She wears fake tan all the time.
She said to one guys shes getting fake tan and he goes "don't use that you will go orange and ugly" but the stupid plonk doesn't realise shes got it on all the time, and he thinks it's her "natural" look and it's hot. Dumb ****.


That's quite funny, blaming men for buying into the (essentially deceptive) glamours women cast on themselves. Isn't that the point?


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Feb 2011, 7:08 am

roadGames wrote:
She dated me because I seemed vulnerable and wasn't the "psychological juggernaut" she first met. Why would you ever want to date someone that seemed weak and vulnerable unless you were a kind of a predator yourself???


Some people are attracted to people with problems, because they are 'fixer uppers'.

Quote:
Here's another ridiculous example. At the beginning of the semester, I dated a girl for a few weeks that only appeared to be actually interested in me after I revealed to her that I've been on prozac for 11 years and have suicidal ideations every now and then. What the hell? Talking about depression/being a downer is supposed to be the key way to get a girl (or anybody, haha) to not like you. I literally told her that I thought sadness was the most profound emotion and that I enjoyed making myself sad sometimes. We had sex on the first date shortly after I talked about science, depression, and suicide (I hate sex on the first date, she got me so drunk/high that I'd be down to do anything!).


Some people might think that makes you deep or profound or something.

Quote:
All of these girls are really pretty and do not give a crap about my rotten personality, haha. I guess I'm a romantic and really affectionate? I can't think of anything besides physical attraction which would make them want to date me (again, not tooting my own horn, these girls have low thresholds for what turns them on, lol).


I find most of your post a bit hard to believe, but fair enough if you manage to be both good looking and suicidal and have a terrible personality and manage to date beautiful people. Fair enough. But I think you're trying to present your personal experiences as being some kind of rule.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


roadGames
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 401

14 Feb 2011, 7:15 am

emlion wrote:
Quote:
A lot of women say this, but then boom, they're dating some tall, square jawed pretty boy. They'll attribute reasons like his personality and confidence as to why they like him, but in the end, they're dating him because he's sexy.


I stopped reading after this.
It's awesome how you know what all women think!


I've seen it happen over and over and over again. It's a very general thing. There are outliers and exceptions to this like anything in human behavior, but I think my post applies pretty well women under 25 at least.

I don't think it's a bad thing at all. Dudes do analogous things all the time. Society makes female attraction some mysterious thing and gets guys erroneously thinking "Oh s**t, what if I said this, this, or that... then maybe she'd like me!" The truth is, she made up her mind as to whether she thought you were cute or not before you opened your mouth. If some girl doesn't like me at first sight, forget it. It's very easy to tell when they like you at first sight. They might do a double take, they might gaze into your eyes a little bit longer, they might smile. It's SO much easier to talk to a girl when she already likes you like that. So much so that I've given up on charming women, because guess what, things like game don't actually exist. Game is just the bare minimum social skills needed to notice and act on it when some girl gives you come-on signals.

Are these girls I get in this way vain or stupid? Absolutely not.



HopefulRomantic
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 399
Location: Atlanta, GA

14 Feb 2011, 7:15 am

No doubt everyone is entitled to determine their own laundry list of preferences and attributes they seek in a viable romantic match.

For my purposes, I choose to place as much emphasis (if not more) on personality and cerebral attributes than on physical attractiveness. Although I contend mutual physical attraction is essential for a successful romantic relationship in most cases, I firmly believe the required meeting of the minds and hearts is the delineating factor (even a dealbreaker) for the sustained longevity of a solid relationship.

Perhaps, Marilyn Monroe said it best about physical beauty: "Gravity catches up with all of us." Not a one of us can avoid aging.

In my personal experience, a person who you love, respect and admire can become stunningly gorgeous to you by sheer virtue of how you feel about them (and vice versa). They become a Gorgeous, Sexual Creature! OOOOOOOOOOOOO LAAAAAAAAAAAA LAAAAAAAAAAAAA!! !

In an attempt to be crystal clear, by "total package" I mean perceiving someone as a combination of all their attributes - mental, spiritual and physical.

End of the day, I believe the mental/cerebral passion IGNITES the physical passion. The more intelligent a man is (life smart as well as book/intellectual smart), my jets become lit and it CATALYZES the physical passion. In the rare cases when someone just DAZZLES me, I become absolutely smitten.

When a man MAKES LOVE to my mind by sheer virtue of his intelligence, passion for life (while still being compassionate, kind and humane), I am inspired and he becomes GORGEOUS to me! Yes, this kind of synergy and attraction is rare - as rare as the Hope Diamond!

On this most glorious of Valentine's Days, I still believe firmly and steadfastly that viewing a viable romantic match as a "total package" is the only successful venue to find the rare, eclectic, elegant, erudite creature who is one's Hope Diamond!

Leslie Lee - a modern-day maverick Hopeful Romantic



Last edited by HopefulRomantic on 14 Feb 2011, 7:33 am, edited 2 times in total.

roadGames
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 401

14 Feb 2011, 7:23 am

Moog wrote:
roadGames wrote:
She dated me because I seemed vulnerable and wasn't the "psychological juggernaut" she first met. Why would you ever want to date someone that seemed weak and vulnerable unless you were a kind of a predator yourself???


Some people are attracted to people with problems, because they are 'fixer uppers'.

Quote:
Here's another ridiculous example. At the beginning of the semester, I dated a girl for a few weeks that only appeared to be actually interested in me after I revealed to her that I've been on prozac for 11 years and have suicidal ideations every now and then. What the hell? Talking about depression/being a downer is supposed to be the key way to get a girl (or anybody, haha) to not like you. I literally told her that I thought sadness was the most profound emotion and that I enjoyed making myself sad sometimes. We had sex on the first date shortly after I talked about science, depression, and suicide (I hate sex on the first date, she got me so drunk/high that I'd be down to do anything!).


Some people might think that makes you deep or profound or something.

Quote:
All of these girls are really pretty and do not give a crap about my rotten personality, haha. I guess I'm a romantic and really affectionate? I can't think of anything besides physical attraction which would make them want to date me (again, not tooting my own horn, these girls have low thresholds for what turns them on, lol).


I find most of your post a bit hard to believe, but fair enough if you manage to be both good looking and suicidal and have a terrible personality and manage to date beautiful people. Fair enough. But I think you're trying to present your personal experiences as being some kind of rule.


-Both of these girls actively smashed my self-esteem in really underhanded ways that I didn't notice until they were long gone. So, they weren't into the whole fixer-upper thing.

-My personal experiences aren't a rule at all, sorry if I make it sound authoritative in any way.

-All of the girls have low self-esteem. I'm not good looking, lol. People with low self-esteem find each other, I guess.



wefunction
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,486

14 Feb 2011, 8:30 am

Looks are important, of course, because that defines my initial attraction to another person. It's not the only thing that's important. I've definitely met some good-looking people who had sh** for brains and zero manners and, therefore, were not worth my time. I also don't like the "pretty boys" like Brad Pitt or Jake Gyllenhoweveryouspellit. I like 'em rough around the edges.



creature1001
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 95
Location: High above the sickle moon

14 Feb 2011, 8:40 am

Looks aren't all that important, but I do tend to attract very attractive partners.
I believe that if you are emotionally attractive to someone they will naturally become physically attractive.
I've dated people who didn't fit the norm of physical beauty, and I was very attracted to them.


_________________
creature1001, as explained in the Merriam-Webster's dictionary:
Swiss cheese loving neurounique alien brained human hybrid.


Kaybee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,446
Location: A hidden forest

14 Feb 2011, 8:59 am

It's very important to me that I'm able to find a prospective partner physically attractive, but I'm able to find a wide variety of types physically attractive if they can attract me mentally first.


_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."