Mitch8817 wrote:
Does everybody have the capacity for love?
Not everybody at this present moment is free to place themselves in such a vulnernable position.
If you long to have someone in your life and have the desire to do what it takes, then you should be able to love.
Mitch8817 wrote:
Scintillate wrote:
Enigmatic_Oddity wrote:
...willingness to completely lose control of your emotions, to let them run free. I keep my emotions on a short leash...
Can we really control feeling?
Emotions cannot be controlled. However, what we can control is the way we use them, react to/with them and act out on them.
We can control how emotions affect us. You can train yourself to not feel anything. The downside is that when you decide to feel again, you have a lot of old stuff to deal with.
Mitch8817 wrote:
Maybe this is love in a way. The raw, inexplainable positive feelings for another person channeled into your actions and thoughts.
I would describe it more as pure warmth and happiness of having that person in your life. There are plenty of reasonable explanations for the existence of love.
The littlest ways of expressing love can have the most profound affect on the loved one.
Mitch8817 wrote:
But where do we draw the line between passion and obsession?
Love is free. Limerence is burdened.
Steve45 wrote:
Reading these messages, it seems there are many kinds of love.
I think that lust, liking, and limerence are what complicate love.
And I think most relationships have a bit of limerence in them.
I think if your love is pure, you won't miss someone because you know that you'll see them again.
That is the love children experience. They're not burdened with worries of jealousy or death.