The Big Maybe
Nah, driving them off will solve all our problems. Once all the girls are chased off, we'll easily form great relationships with women whenever we want, and all our problems with meeting them and getting along with them will vanish into thin air.
Now this may seem counterintuitive, but in fact, it's statistical problem-solving at its most logical. Women cause problems/dilemma. Therefore reduce the number of women, and you reduce the problems! For maximum efficiency, the number of women should be reduced to 0, because then the problems will also be reduced to 0. Can't you see the incredible genius behind this strategy, GWH?
This is going to work brilliantly, trust me.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
I think part of that (just part) is that when a lot of guys who are "awkward" get together, it can create an environment that is actively hostile to women. When guys come here to "vent" or complain about women or display bad attitudes about women, it makes it an uncomfortable place to be a woman.
You see this in online gaming / gaming forums where the women who do participate often hide their gender to avoid being flamed and sexually harassed.
If you want there to be more girls, make it a nice place for girls to be.
This is a chicken-egg thing and I seriously doubt that you and I will never see eye to eye on.
The guys wouldn't be awkward if they hadn't been turned down constantly, ridiculed, or have been otherwise completely unsuccessful in their dealings with women. This leads to the bitter, angry attitude and compounds the awkwardness which in turn leads to the uncomfortable feeling you are mentioning. This then, as you said, makes women want to stay away, which FURTHER compounds the awkwardness, bitterness, frustration and anger. It just builds and builds and builds becoming ever more toxic.
Blame it on society, blame it on whatever you want, but it doesn't change the fact that constantly negative human interactions will eventually take their toll on anyone, they just do it quicker and more destructively on those who are already suffering from some sort of problem.
The thing is, it doesn't have to. The reason it does is because people externalize their problems because they're not willing to accept self responsibility for some of the problems, or indulge in defeatism so they don't have to. This is a cycle that can be broken - its all a question of the attitudes people choose to take. Frankly its a choice between attitudes formed by logic or emotion.
Sometimes I want to take the things Edgewaters says out behind the middle school and get them pregnant.
Is that bad?
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
The thing is, it doesn't have to. The reason it does is because people externalize their problems because they're not willing to accept self responsibility for some of the problems, or indulge in defeatism so they don't have to. This is a cycle that can be broken - its all a question of the attitudes people choose to take. Frankly its a choice between attitudes formed by logic or emotion.
What you are suggesting is that in order to do better.. the socially awkward guys should.. well .. just stop being socially awkward. Not really much chance of that happening is there? I guess it resolves you of having to come up with a real solution.. much easier to just blame the victim.
Take your Randian self responsibility and sell it some place else, cause I'm not interested.
Not at all.
It's simple. I don't blame women for me being awkward. So I don't get that frustration and hate some have against them. It's also ... true. It's nobody's fault I am the way I am. Not mine, not anybody else's. It just is. It's less than ideal for sure, but ... I just have to be stoic about it. That's the hand I got dealt. I could wish I got dealt a different hand all I like, be angry that others got dealt a better hand, but in the end my best bet is just to take what I've got and come up with the best strategy I can.
Because if you're going to get frustrated without women, you're going to get frustrated when you're with them too. It's that old saying, women, can't live with them, can't live without them, it's equally frustrating no matter what. If your technique to manage that frustration is to get into a vicious cycle of hate and recrimination, that'll be what happens in a relationship too once that early phase of being sort of buzzed wears off.
Last edited by edgewaters on 01 Jun 2012, 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Not at all.
It's simple. I don't blame women for me being awkward. So I don't get that frustration and hate some have against them. It's also ... true. It's nobody's fault I am the way I am. Not mine, not anybody else's. It just is. It's less than ideal for sure, but ... I just have to be stoic about it.
Because if you're going to get frustrated without women, you're going to get frustrated when you're with them too. It's that old saying, women, can't live with them, can't live without them, it's equally frustrating no matter what. If your technique to manage that frustration is to get into a vicious cycle of hate and recrimination, that'll be what happens in a relationship too once that early phase of being sort of buzzed wears off.
This is exactly how I feel, too, except that I'm an awkward *woman* and I'm interested in men. It's really the same for me! And it has been, all 44 years of my life so far.
Not at all.
It's simple. I don't blame women for me being awkward. So I don't get that frustration and hate some have against them. It's also ... true. It's nobody's fault I am the way I am. Not mine, not anybody else's. It just is. It's less than ideal for sure, but ... I just have to be stoic about it. That's the hand I got dealt. I could wish I got dealt a different hand all I like, be angry that others got dealt a better hand, but in the end my best bet is just to take what I've got and come up with the best strategy I can.
I guess if being accepting of your lot in life and giving up works for you... more power to you?
spongy
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,055
Location: Patiently waiting for the seventh wave
The thing is, it doesn't have to. The reason it does is because people externalize their problems because they're not willing to accept self responsibility for some of the problems, or indulge in defeatism so they don't have to. This is a cycle that can be broken - its all a question of the attitudes people choose to take. Frankly its a choice between attitudes formed by logic or emotion.
What you are suggesting is that in order to do better.. the socially awkward guys should.. well .. just stop being socially awkward. Not really much chance of that happening is there? I guess it resolves you of having to come up with a real solution.. much easier to just blame the victim.
Take your Randian self responsibility and sell it some place else, cause I'm not interested.
Can I be honest with you?.
Yes there are two different approaches to this problem. Each of them has its good sides and each of them has its bad sides, Im going to go over them now.
First approach would be to tell you that the world sucks and its not your fault.
The pro of this approach is that it makes you feel better almost instantly.
The con is that the world is still going to suck no matter how many times we complain about its "suckiness" so this good feeling isnt going to last for long because the same thing will keep happening over and over and over and over... and this is a vicious cycle since the world isnt going to change and you are unlikely to decide to change by yourself.
Trust me I spent my time thinking that the everything sucked and I was a victim and I had some people that symphatized with me, the only thing that made me better approaching people of either gender was working on my approach instead of complaining about how my current approach wasnt successful.
It took me a while to see that things werent going to be sorted by themselves but you are more than free to ignore it and go down your own path.
Then theres the "the only element in common in all this events is you so you may need to try to work on yourself" approach.
Cons: working in yourself isnt an easy task, results arent guaranteed, this sort of thing can be shamed upon by society so you may need to be carefull about how you talk about it with...
Pros: If you manage to make some improvements they are likelier to last than the instant feel good and you will start seeing some good changes on how people act around you.
Can you honestly say that you dont see why people everywhere keep encouraging the second approach over the first one?
No, I honestly cannot see why anyone would undertake the second approach. You are advocating the same thing every guidance councilor, therapist, teacher, doctor and parent I've ever talked to has said.. CONFORM or DIE.
If it's not your fault, you have no responsibility to fix it.
Both of our approaches are about as equally effective, yours just requires a lot more work on your part.
Made glorious summer by this sun of York;
And all the clouds that lour'd upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths;
Our bruised arms hung up for monuments;
Our stern alarums chang'd to merry meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visag'd war hath smooth'd his wrinkled front,
And now, instead of mounting barbed steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady's chamber
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I-that am not shap'd for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass-
I-that am rudely stamp'd, and want love's majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph-
I-that am curtail'd of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
Deform'd, unfinish'd, sent before my time
Into this breathing world scarce half made up,
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me as I halt by them-
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
And descant on mine own deformity.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels, and dreams,
To set my brother Clarence and the King
In deadly hate the one against the other;
And if King Edward be as true and just
As I am subtle, false, and treacherous,
This day should Clarence closely be mew'd up-
About a prophecy which says that G
Of Edward's heirs the murderer shall be.
Last edited by rabbittss on 01 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA
The thing is, it doesn't have to. The reason it does is because people externalize their problems because they're not willing to accept self responsibility for some of the problems, or indulge in defeatism so they don't have to. This is a cycle that can be broken - its all a question of the attitudes people choose to take. Frankly its a choice between attitudes formed by logic or emotion.
What you are suggesting is that in order to do better.. the socially awkward guys should.. well .. just stop being socially awkward. Not really much chance of that happening is there? I guess it resolves you of having to come up with a real solution.. much easier to just blame the victim.
Take your Randian self responsibility and sell it some place else, cause I'm not interested.
Can I be honest with you?.
Yes there are two different approaches to this problem. Each of them has its good sides and each of them has its bad sides, Im going to go over them now.
First approach would be to tell you that the world sucks and its not your fault.
The pro of this approach is that it makes you feel better almost instantly.
The con is that the world is still going to suck no matter how many times we complain about its "suckiness" so this good feeling isnt going to last for long because the same thing will keep happening over and over and over and over... and this is a vicious cycle since the world isnt going to change and you are unlikely to decide to change by yourself.
Trust me I spent my time thinking that the everything sucked and I was a victim and I had some people that symphatized with me, the only thing that made me better approaching people of either gender was working on my approach instead of complaining about how my current approach wasnt successful.
It took me a while to see that things werent going to be sorted by themselves but you are more than free to ignore it and go down your own path.
Then theres the "the only element in common in all this events is you so you may need to try to work on yourself" approach.
Cons: working in yourself isnt an easy task, results arent guaranteed, this sort of thing can be shamed upon by society so you may need to be carefull about how you talk about it with...
Pros: If you manage to make some improvements they are likelier to last than the instant feel good and you will start seeing some good changes on how people act around you.
Can you honestly say that you dont see why people everywhere keep encouraging the second approach over the first one?
Another con with it is that if things don't improve much after working on yourself a while; you could start blaming yourself & feel like you are the problem no matter what you do which causes you to have no self esteem & get depressed.
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
MXH
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
The thing is, it doesn't have to. The reason it does is because people externalize their problems because they're not willing to accept self responsibility for some of the problems, or indulge in defeatism so they don't have to. This is a cycle that can be broken - its all a question of the attitudes people choose to take. Frankly its a choice between attitudes formed by logic or emotion.
What you are suggesting is that in order to do better.. the socially awkward guys should.. well .. just stop being socially awkward. Not really much chance of that happening is there? I guess it resolves you of having to come up with a real solution.. much easier to just blame the victim.
Take your Randian self responsibility and sell it some place else, cause I'm not interested.
Can I be honest with you?.
Yes there are two different approaches to this problem. Each of them has its good sides and each of them has its bad sides, Im going to go over them now.
First approach would be to tell you that the world sucks and its not your fault.
The pro of this approach is that it makes you feel better almost instantly.
The con is that the world is still going to suck no matter how many times we complain about its "suckiness" so this good feeling isnt going to last for long because the same thing will keep happening over and over and over and over... and this is a vicious cycle since the world isnt going to change and you are unlikely to decide to change by yourself.
Trust me I spent my time thinking that the everything sucked and I was a victim and I had some people that symphatized with me, the only thing that made me better approaching people of either gender was working on my approach instead of complaining about how my current approach wasnt successful.
It took me a while to see that things werent going to be sorted by themselves but you are more than free to ignore it and go down your own path.
Then theres the "the only element in common in all this events is you so you may need to try to work on yourself" approach.
Cons: working in yourself isnt an easy task, results arent guaranteed, this sort of thing can be shamed upon by society so you may need to be carefull about how you talk about it with...
Pros: If you manage to make some improvements they are likelier to last than the instant feel good and you will start seeing some good changes on how people act around you.
Can you honestly say that you dont see why people everywhere keep encouraging the second approach over the first one?
Another con with it is that if things don't improve much after working on yourself a while; you could start blaming yourself & feel like you are the problem no matter what you do which causes you to have no self esteem & get depressed.
yep. thats wherei am now. Its not somewhere that escape is likely from.
spongy
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,055
Location: Patiently waiting for the seventh wave
If it's not your fault, you have no responsibility to fix it.
Both of our approaches are about as equally effective, yours just requires a lot more work on your part.
Made glorious summer by this sun of York;
And all the clouds that lour'd upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths;
Our bruised arms hung up for monuments;
Our stern alarums chang'd to merry meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visag'd war hath smooth'd his wrinkled front,
And now, instead of mounting barbed steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady's chamber
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I-that am not shap'd for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass-
I-that am rudely stamp'd, and want love's majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph-
I-that am curtail'd of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
Deform'd, unfinish'd, sent before my time
Into this breathing world scarce half made up,
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me as I halt by them-
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
And descant on mine own deformity.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels, and dreams,
To set my brother Clarence and the King
In deadly hate the one against the other;
And if King Edward be as true and just
As I am subtle, false, and treacherous,
This day should Clarence closely be mew'd up-
About a prophecy which says that G
Of Edward's heirs the murderer shall be.
Alright then.
Im very sorry for whatever is happening to you. It wont change a thing and it´ll keep happening over and over if you keep the same approach but Im truly sorry that this is happening to you
