As a start, you should read this:
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your- ... ne-dating/
Quote:
As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-looking than medium. Very harsh. On the other hand, when it comes to actual messaging, women shift their expectations only just slightly ahead of the curve, which is a healthier pattern than guys’ pursuing the all-but-unattainable. But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her, but she then goes right out and messages them anyway.
Just to illustrate that women are operating on a very different scale, here are just a few of the many, many guys we here in the office think are totally decent-looking, but that women have rated, in their occult way, as significantly less attractive than so-called “medium”:
Females of OkCupid, we site founders say to you: ouch! Paradoxically, it seems it’s women, not men, who have unrealistic standards for the “average” member of the opposite sex.
So in order to get any chance on dating sites you should become of the 20%.
Not of the 20% = nothing. (unless if you happen to be extremely lucky but ..duh..).
Women aren't attracted to a man who is a gentleman, they are attracted to an Alpha (alpha-looking in the case of online dating) and they would like him to behave like a gentleman.