Ratae wrote:
Should all sub standard looking or ugly males be rounded up and put into gas chambers for the good of humanity? I understand that this would lead to my own excruciating death, but in a woman's ideal world this it what they want to happen? There will be no more 'creeps' hitting on you. You won't have those painful moments when an ugly guy is checking you out in public or a bar. Just think ladies what a paradise it would be.
If humanity is to survive and prosper, a far superior alien race must find earth and begin this sub 5/10 male cleansing.
Only good looking masculine hunks and male models will survive and procreate with females.
No, but some males should not be allowed to reproduce. Hint: it has little to do with looks. Historically, I don't think looks were universally a survival advantage either. They are definitely not so today. You have to remember that a sophisticated view of Evolution looks at the evolution of groups and species, not just individuals. Survival of the fittest requires a good deal of cooperation.
From a utilitarian point of view, good looks have very little benefit in society, except as athletes and entertainers. The qualities that contribute the most to society have little to do with looks. I would argue that engineers, administrators, scientists, STEM fields have the most to offer, and success in these fields has little to do with looks.
I wouldn't be opposed to preventing people with low IQ's and a felony record from reproducing.