Not interested in woman with children.

Post Reply New Topic

I stand by what I said, I will be happy with a woman who has kids already

It is against the fundamental laws of evolution for any male of any species to willingly bring up offspring of another. I don’t want to talk about what lions do. But generally speaking I don’t think that many women can understand this unless they go through the effort of learning Darwinian Biology and see things from a scientific prospective.

Another thing is that I have other responsibilities in my own family. I do support my own family to a limited extent without the small support I give to them, I don’t they would be able to survive financially. At a point I would be expected to drop that support and think about my own life family. If I was to drop that support for someone with children, then it is someone else’s child that is going to benefit opposed to my own family. I know my young sister Natasha is going to have a very hard time in life and I am the only one who she will be able to trust when my mother is not around.

Though I have to admit that love can strike at anytime to anyone, but for many, *if not most usually end up finding someone to stop them from being alone because being alone really hurts. But I am not yet willing to take on a mother with children if the love, real love is not there. It would be too much for very little in return. If I want someone, to be there to stop me from being alone, then I want the relationship to be lightweight at best.

As far as generalising man, then it is quite easy to generalise the single woman who have never married thus not respecting the sanctity of a stable marriage to bring up a child into. And personally I do believe in strong marriage and bring up children. But my discussion isn’t about whether having children out of wedlock is morale or not, it is about the relationship between me and someone who already has children.

Don't see how that comes into it, this is the human race, some of us do not mind raising the offspring of other males, I certainly do not mind and I stand by what I said

I would certainly date women with kids from a previous relationship. I might be able to become a good male role model for them. Plus I do not want kids of my own, because they would likely have some form of autism and go through the torture I went through growing up.

I think everyone gets that by now, or are you just repeating it to remind yourself of your belief?

Not to remind myself, sometimes if someone appears not to notice the point I reemphasise it, anyway that is besides the point

Missing the "point" and disagreeing with it in some fashion are not one and the same. Furthermore, "I stand by what I said" doesn't reinforce anything.

I give up

Give up on what? Telling others that you are "right" in a subjective matter? Or was that meant to be patronizing, in that you simply can't "reach" me?

no and no

just give up explaining to you a simple concept, now lets forget about it

Maybe it would be easier to understand if you got off the horse.

There are some of us that do see from the scientific prospective and learned Darwinian biology and all but also comparing humans to lions or other animals that don't well practice free will and such that humans to really isn't completely relevant. Many tribes brought up children not based just because they were their off spring as many other mothers and all would take on children not their own to deal with raising them as a village not just as the offspring of a specific pairing. Lions do what they do out of instinct. Humans have learned how to deal better with situations as this.

And as far children outside marriage and all, not every situation always ends up permitting it and not every marriage is perfect and all... if it was the divorce rates wouldn't be so high. That's all I have to say about that. All you can do is deal with the situation you're in presently... can't change the past.

The pool of single women with no child approaches zero as the age of the women increases. So understand that having this criteria dramatically reduce the chance of
ever finding a mate.

Taking care of children of another mother in the same tribe is of evolutionary benefit to the tribe as a while. Same thing apply to taking care of my sisters children to a better extent. But taking care of someone else children who is outside of tribe and family?

NT often do what they do by instinct. Lets not forget that all major religions always talk about the special something called FREE WILL that animals don’t have. But when it comes to war (survival of the fittest) and the implementation of Social Darwinians religion seems to be the always doing this and no different then the animals.

NT believes the truth is whatever works for them and helps them to survive or gets them more material gain. For aspies the truth is scientific truth regardless of whether it helps them ore not. But do you believe the world is going to suddenly become more like aspies? No it will not, mother nature will not have it that way, especially if I decide to look after an NT stud muffins children.

I'd be interested in women with chileren only if they were willing to make more kids with me.

It is very false to believe that there is such a thing as evolution of kindness and compassion and us human evolve we shed of our animal instincts to become an almost Buddha figure. If it was the case then we would all be Buddha long before man set feet on the surface of the moon.

Do you think that as we continue to evolve as a human specie that we will evolve a way to acquiring happy marriage with man and wife.

I can tell you a million years of evolution will not make that happen because Mother Nature is cruel. The reason why there are so many broken families is down to the man; who breaks up a relationship so that he can go off and have more children with another woman.

These times are different then in hunter gatherers time where a single woman with children survival rate was very poor because she did not have a means to hunt and provide for her young. Even up to last century, having a male provider was important.

But now in modern time children of single parent families are all surviving to adult hood. The man realizes he does not have to be around to guarantee that child’s survival and goes off to gets some more. They are going for quantity vs quality and in this case quantity has quality of it’s own.

Human being is wicked and ignorant much of the time their kindness through ignorance turns to wickedness and savagery survival of the fittest just like the other savage animal on this planet.