Page 2 of 2 [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

The Grand Inquisitor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,785

12 Jan 2018, 2:29 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
There are many people with many “red crosses” who do well with getting partners.

Obviously, any person should seek to improve one’s self.

But....I wouldn’t preclude myself from obtaining a relationship by virtue of the fact that I’m “nerdy” or I’m overweight. There are other aspects of people that people like. It’s good to always be clean, though.

Hey, if you're having success, clearly the green ticks to red crosses ratio isn't skewed enough that your dating options are severely limited. There do exist people for whom this is the case though, and they're the people who would benefit from some self-improvement before trying the dating scene. If you're having practically no success even getting a date over a prolonged period of time, there's probably a reason for that.



DancingQueen
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2018
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 176
Location: UK

12 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm

I don't think there's anything you've said that's incorrect. It's definitely not misogynistic because it works with both genders. But Aspies don't like change so a lot of people here probably don't want to change themselves or the way they look for and pursue a potential partner. I know somebody who, when he was a teenager, would start fancying a girl, ask them out via text (never in person), pursue them to the point where they felt uncomfortable and they backed off, was pursuing multiple girls at once and they often knew each other so they knew he wasn't even that into them, and even when his friends tried to show him what he was doing wrong he just wouldn't listen. After getting rejected, he would decide the girl was a slut. Then did it all again with the next girl. :roll: I'm pretty sure he's an Aspie.


_________________
Aspergers
INFP


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Jan 2018, 3:24 pm

DancingQueen wrote:
I don't think there's anything you've said that's incorrect. It's definitely not misogynistic because it works with both genders. But Aspies don't like change so a lot of people here probably don't want to change themselves or the way they look for and pursue a potential partner. I know somebody who, when he was a teenager, would start fancying a girl, ask them out via text (never in person), pursue them to the point where they felt uncomfortable and they backed off, was pursuing multiple girls at once and they often knew each other so they knew he wasn't even that into them, and even when his friends tried to show him what he was doing wrong he just wouldn't listen. After getting rejected, he would decide the girl was a slut. Then did it all again with the next girl. :roll: I'm pretty sure he's an Aspie.


No you're not, this just your own personal out-of-ass diagnosis. :roll:



DancingQueen
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2018
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 176
Location: UK

12 Jan 2018, 4:21 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
DancingQueen wrote:
I don't think there's anything you've said that's incorrect. It's definitely not misogynistic because it works with both genders. But Aspies don't like change so a lot of people here probably don't want to change themselves or the way they look for and pursue a potential partner. I know somebody who, when he was a teenager, would start fancying a girl, ask them out via text (never in person), pursue them to the point where they felt uncomfortable and they backed off, was pursuing multiple girls at once and they often knew each other so they knew he wasn't even that into them, and even when his friends tried to show him what he was doing wrong he just wouldn't listen. After getting rejected, he would decide the girl was a slut. Then did it all again with the next girl. :roll: I'm pretty sure he's an Aspie.


No you're not, this just your own personal out-of-ass diagnosis. :roll:
I don't think he's an Aspie because of the above, I know him pretty well. His doctor thought so too but they gave a different diagnosis in the end.


_________________
Aspergers
INFP


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

12 Jan 2018, 9:19 pm

The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Pretty sure noone here is trying to get super models. :shrug:

This is said in every second thread already.

You obviously missed the point. You don't have to be a supermodel to be turning down people who don't really have anything going for them.


I don’t see the point of this thread. It’s repeated by about 10 members in every misogynistic rant here, so about 60% of the threads. You’re flogging a dead horse. The people who probably need to read this won’t or are too deluded to think they have a problem. Ranting at them won’t help.

The people who complain most here will literally date any female human so this isn’t the problem. They already know they appear unattractive in whatever forms. They don’t need you to tell them.

Well judging by your first comment, you really don't have a clue what I'm actually saying here. I only mentioned supermodels to make the point that if you've got enough going for you that you can get with one whenever you want, 5/10s probably aren't going to appeal to you much. Not everyone can get with supermodels, nor should they aspire to, but if it's easy for you to get with the kind of people you're attracted to, why would you settle for less?

Are you insinuating that my 'rant' is misogynistic? What, it's sexist to talk about people's looks now, is it? I don't have a clue where else you'd get misogyny from in this thread.

I've never seen anyone here say that they would date literally 'any female human', and that's not the impression I get from their posts either. Not having options is going to make you less picky, just as having more options allows you to be more picky, but even so I very much doubt even the most forever-alone of forever-aloners here is operating with such loose standards that they'd date literally any female who gave them the time of day.

I don't doubt that most who haven't been able to date are able to recognise where they stand as it relates to the dating world. What I don't understand is why they would keep trying to market a product that's not selling itself, instead of tweaking the product until it finds its market.

As you might be aware, my situation isn't too far removed from that of the guys we're talking about. The difference is I acknowledge that putting myself out there in any capacity isn't likely to get me the results I want at this stage. I see the red crosses next to my name, and I acknowledge that I've got to turn a few of them into green ticks before I have any right to expect the results I want. I'm just trying to get others in a similar position to understand that what they have to offer might simply not be enough at this stage. A caring personality generally doesn't compensate for significant shortcomings in appearance, employment and living situation.

I'm not saying people need to be perfect, or get rid of all of their 'red crosses', but you can only really ask for the equivalent of what you can offer. If you can't offer much, you can't get much.


I know exactly what you’re saying. People won’t get anyone if they out of their league in on way or another. I just think people already know they’re unattractive. It’s stating the obvious, it really is. I can’t think of one guy here who seems to fit your description of expecting someone out if their league, hence the confusion as to why you posted this lecture.

The only exception is that guy who got banned who didn’t want fat women, and People already drummed the contents of this thread into him before he was banned.

I didn’t say or imply your thread was misogynistic. I implied half of the other threads in here are.