Hot women are happier with average looking men

Page 2 of 11 [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

Teach51
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.

18 Jul 2020, 8:00 am

Pepe wrote:
Lilinoe wrote:
And everyone would be happier if we weren't obsessed with appearances and were instead at least a little interested about not being douchebags in love life...


Blame the evolutionary process. <shrug>


Is this the evolutionary process where boobs are more important to a man than qualities such as diligence, wisdom, integrity?......No wonder the world is in such a mess :lol:


_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.


Last edited by Teach51 on 18 Jul 2020, 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

18 Jul 2020, 8:35 am

Teach51 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Lilinoe wrote:
And everyone would be happier if we weren't obsessed with appearances and were instead at least a little interested about not being douchebags in love life...


Blame the evolutionary process. <shrug>


Is this the evolutionary provess where boobs are more important to a man than qualities such as diligence, wisdom, integrity?......No wonder the world is in such a mess :lol:


For some men, yes.
But I am not "Some Men". 8)



Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

18 Jul 2020, 9:46 am

Teach51 wrote:
Is this the evolutionary process where boobs are more important to a man than qualities such as diligence, wisdom, integrity?......No wonder the world is in such a mess :lol:


The human courtship process makes a lot more sense if you start from the understanding that we are, effectively, still cave people.

Meet Ögg:

Image

"Me Ögg! Big strong, get much meat for feed big clan! Ögg need mate. Make carving to show:

Image

Perfect mate to birth and feed all Öggs babbies!


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

18 Jul 2020, 10:44 am

That’s a “Venus.” About 25,000 BC or so.

It probably had more religious significance than courtship significance.

Cro-Magnons, it is said, had a dignified air about them.



Teach51
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.

18 Jul 2020, 11:20 am

Wolfram87 wrote:
Teach51 wrote:
Is this the evolutionary process where boobs are more important to a man than qualities such as diligence, wisdom, integrity?......No wonder the world is in such a mess :lol:


The human courtship process makes a lot more sense if you start from the understanding that we are, effectively, still cave people.

Meet Ögg:

Image

"Me Ögg! Big strong, get much meat for feed big clan! Ögg need mate. Make carving to show:

Image

Perfect mate to birth and feed all Öggs babbies!



Lol I understand what's going on, I am partial to an alpha caveman myself on occasion, but it never contributes to a happy long-term co-existence that would benefit humanity. I was raised on Jimmy Stewart and Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn mushy films. I want my money back! Real life is just a sordid cess pool and people need to learn social behaviour from animals, animals never take more than they need unlike humans who aim to divide, destroy and exploit. Deep sigh.


_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.


Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

18 Jul 2020, 11:34 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
That’s a “Venus.” About 25,000 BC or so.

It probably had more religious significance than courtship significance.

Cro-Magnons, it is said, had a dignified air about them.


Didn't say it had courtship significance. But in presumably being a carving representing fertility, it can be reasonably considered a clue to what would be a desirable traits in a woman of the time. And a plus-size woman with wide hips and large tracts of land would probably be highly desirable among hunter-gatherers.

And Cro-magnons were anatomically modern humans, so make of that what you will concerning their dignified bearing.


Teach51 wrote:
I want my money back!


Heh, you and me both.


Teach51 wrote:
animals never take more than they need


Small digression, but that's not true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_killing


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


smudge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,716
Location: Moved on

18 Jul 2020, 11:36 am

^ I'm bored out of my skull too, though that probably doesn't have much to do with your signature quote.


_________________
I've left WP.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

18 Jul 2020, 12:01 pm

Humans probably didn’t speak like stereotypical cavemen back in Cro-Magnon days.

The languages of “primitive” people, by and large, are more complex than those of post-industrial people.



Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

18 Jul 2020, 12:06 pm

Which probably went a long way towards the extinction of those languages.

And I was making a funny for the purpose of illustration, not making an honest attempt att recreating whatever the Cro-Magnons spoke. I used the word "babby" for dogs sake.


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


quite an extreme
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Age: 326
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,922
Location: Germany

18 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Humans probably didn’t speak like stereotypical cavemen back in Cro-Magnon days.

The languages of “primitive” people, by and large, are more complex than those of post-industrial people.

People have a wrong idea of the people in stone age. Just think about the indians before Columbus. They were anything but primitive.


_________________
I am as I am. :skull: :sunny: :wink: :sunny: :skull: Life has to be an adventure!


Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

18 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm

The "stone age" is a bloody long span of time, which is why it's divided into the paleolithic and the neolithic eras. The Native Americans were most similar to the younger era.


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


Teach51
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,808
Location: Where angels do not fear to tread.

18 Jul 2020, 12:40 pm

Wolfram87 wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
That’s a “Venus.” About 25,000 BC or so.

It probably had more religious significance than courtship significance.

Cro-Magnons, it is said, had a dignified air about them.


Didn't say it had courtship significance. But in presumably being a carving representing fertility, it can be reasonably considered a clue to what would be a desirable traits in a woman of the time. And a plus-size woman with wide hips and large tracts of land would probably be highly desirable among hunter-gatherers.

And Cro-magnons were anatomically modern humans, so make of that what you will concerning their dignified bearing.


Teach51 wrote:
I want my money back!


Heh, you and me both.


Teach51 wrote:
animals never take more than they need


Small digression, but that's not true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_killing



I bet the stoats had a legitimate reason for surplus killing, like Black Friday or 4 for the price of one.. .... . They may be bartering with each other.....


_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

18 Jul 2020, 12:41 pm

There are people in the present day who still use stone tools.

The Paleolithic is approximately from 10,000 BC to a few million years BC

The Mesolithic (that term is going out of style), is from 5,000 - 10,000 BC, defending on location. It seems as if many places “skipped” the Mesolithic.

The Neolithic is from like 8,000 BC to about 2,000 BC, depending on location.

In some places, the Bronze Age started about 3,000 BC, while other places remained Neolithic (like the British Isles).



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

18 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm

I'd like to introduce you to a distant relative of mine. His name is "Urg" le Pew.

Image

He doesn't talk much, these days. :mrgreen:

Wolfram87 wrote:

Image

Perfect mate to birth and feed all Öggs babbies!


I approached her myself,
For some, you know. :wink:
But I got a stony reception. :?

C'est la vie. :shrug:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

18 Jul 2020, 1:42 pm

Wolfram87 wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
That’s a “Venus.” About 25,000 BC or so.

It probably had more religious significance than courtship significance.

Cro-Magnons, it is said, had a dignified air about them.


Didn't say it had courtship significance. But in presumably being a carving representing fertility, it can be reasonably considered a clue to what would be a desirable traits in a woman of the time. And a plus-size woman with wide hips and large tracts of land would probably be highly desirable among hunter-gatherers.


The ability to acquire and maintain "Cuddliness" equated to surviving famine periods, through the ease of putting on weight when there was plenty, hence, the value of this characteristic in the caveman days. 8)

BTW, This effigy is the earliest known example of a "Sex Doll". :heart: :mrgreen:

smudge wrote:
^ I'm bored out of my skull too, though that probably doesn't have much to do with your signature quote.


"I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame."

Whoa! I didn't realise the sexual innuendo until just now!
I am getting hot and bothered.
I will never see Wolfram in the same light again. :twisted:



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,183
Location: US

18 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm

Teach51 wrote:
This may not be a popular statement but I find that self-proclaimed "average" looking men who lament here that they can't get "hot" women is a glaringly, blatant, superficial double standard. :lol: Oh! Woe to us average run of the mill plain ladies! Who will take the trouble to uncover the beauty within the imperfect beast?

Goes both ways.
I’ve seen plenty fat, not so hot women on dating sites say they only date a handsome fit guy with his life together. Guess they figure they deserve a brand Pitt type guy just for being alive.
I get overlooked, so I don’t feel sorry for them when they complain about being alone.

I hope I wasn’t one you were thinking of when you posted. I’ve only once even tried asking out someone super pretty and thin, never again. First woman I every asked out. all the others were cubby and not what society deems pretty. I kinda prefer chubby women. I’ve since learned my place in life and don’t ask any women out anymore.
I don’t think most men will take the trouble to uncover the beauty within the imperfect beast anymore then most women will.
Western society is extremely superficial, most people don’t want to settle for less then what they believe they’re owed.


_________________
There is no place for me in the world. I'm going into the wilderness, probably to die