ToadOfSteel wrote:
Orbyss wrote:
Blatherskite wrote:
No way you idiots, it's all about Libras. Libras rule!
I should know, I am one. I'm also a Cock*. Oddly enough, I tend to fit all the descriptions, too. It's a pity I buy into those things, you know, not at all. Though, I'm curious how Capricorns and Libras are supposed to fair in relationships, though. One never knows if there's more to this than meets the logical eye.
The trick behind horoscopes you read in the paper is that they are so general that they can be applied to any of the 12 signs, and any believer will interpret this statement in a way that makes sense to them.
For instance, a horoscope from Horoscope.com:
Quote:
It’s possible you’ll be sensitive to impending planetary changes. Perhaps a desire to tie up any loose ends needs to be addressed. Old memories may be stirred, while present doubts may be exaggerated, but it’s best not to act on any negative feelings today, because tomorrow brings a burst of confidence!
Which sign is this associated with?
Hah, oh my god, horoscopes. I never read the damn things, even just out of curiosity, they're so utterly pointless.
Of course, that's what astrology seems to be about, to me. Mine is the only one of anyone I know that fits at all, though, which is odd, but that's also not saying much. Still, anything I read is just so general it's painful. But, looking at my boyfriend's, his doesn't fit at all, even though it's general. Hell, I just don't know.

According to Wikipedia (I bolded what fit):
Quote:
* Diplomatic / compromising, however possibly manipulative
* Cooperative - totally dependent on the situation, just like for anyone
* Fair / balanced / impartial - maybe, totally subjective, depends on who you ask
* Idealistic (in relationships) - to a fault
* Charming - this is outright grossly flattering, come on
* Sociable and easy-going, love having people around them
* Indecisive / changeable - NO
* Peace loving
* Elegant / graceful - hell if I know
* Refined / artistic / good taste
* Pleasure oriented
* Gentle
* Sensitive to others
* Analytical, clear-minded and logical, however still manages to be gullible and influenceable, naive.
* Kind - that's totally subjective
* Cheerful - NO
* Romantic, strongly interested in the opposite sex - I guess?
* Flirty / frivolous, however loyal in marriage
Still, hilariously vague. And what bothers me about any of these astrological or personality things is that they're so goddamn flattering. Give me a break, let's see what it says about the
bad facets to get the whole picture.
Anyway, I'd be interested to see how and who came up with these descriptions, and how much they've changed over the centuries.
Oddly enough, I fit all the good and bad described in the MBTI about the cognitive style of INFJ -- introverted intuitive feeler judger. And at least OKCupid has a test made by someone who decided not to be outright flattering about the results:
Quote:
INFJ - FREAK
Well, well, well. How did someone like you end up with the least common personality type of them all? In a group of 100 Americans, only 0.5 others would be just like you. You really are one of a kind... In fact, I do believe that that's one of the definitions for the word "FREAK."
Freak's not such a bad word to describe you actually.
You are deep, complex, secretive and extremely difficult to understand. If that doesn't scream "Freak!" I don't know what does. No-one actually knows the REAL you, do they?
You probably have deep interests in creative expression as well as issues of spirituality and human development.
You've probably even been called a "psychic" before, because of your uncanny knack to understand and "read" people without quite knowing how you do it. Don't fret. You're not actually psychic. That would make you special and you'll never accomplish that.
You're also quite possibly the most emotional of them all, so don't take this all too hard. Nevertheless you most definitely have the strangest personality type and that's not necessarily a good thing.