Will any female here actually admit to liking jerks?

Page 11 of 18 [ 274 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next

BellaDonna
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,858

01 Feb 2009, 8:57 am

Okay, lol.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

01 Feb 2009, 11:18 am

BellaDonna wrote:

You don't want to become a woman. They get it hard.


:wink: only if we are lucky, BD! :roll:


Merle


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


zee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,292
Location: on a cloud

01 Feb 2009, 1:27 pm

benjimanbreeg wrote:
zee wrote:
MR_BOGAN wrote:
sinsboldly So what are women fighting for these days?

I think because you have been treated badly by some men in the past, you have predjudice views about men in general.


If I may cut in, can I just state why I think men and women aren't completely equal yet, and why I'm often called a feminist?

For one thing, women are expected to put more effort into their appearance. I stopped shaving my legs years ago and guys have commented "you don't shave your legs?" to which I say "why, do you?"
Also, the fact that women should wear make-up and uncomfortable shoes in a business type setting.

I work in male-dominated industries. (I'm a stagehand by trade but have also worked in warehouses, landscaping, construction sites, airport baggage handling, and other labour jobs). Often I'm the only woman and I meet guys who think they have to treat me differently, like maybe I'm not strong enough to lift things, etc. If I couldn't do the job, then I wouldn't be there, would I?


Like men probably get accused of being gay if they do woman's jobs. There's always problems like that at work, not just for women. If it bothers you that much, then try and find a different job.


There's nothing wrong with being gay, and I have no problem with 'feminine' men. Yes, I am sure they get some harassment as well because they don't fit their gender stereotype. I guy I work with recently told me a story of how he was the victim of "reverse sexism" because he was working as a set decorator on a film set, and he was the only man. (He's not feminine in appearance or mannerisms at all, btw). He said he was sent home first because the lead guy liked to see all the girls who "look sexy in their toolbelts". So actually, it's still the men being sexist, it just has a different effect.

And no, I'm not going to quit a job I like just because other people have a problem with it. Some women are just more physically active, plus the obvious fact that my lack of communication skills and social grace would automatically disqualify me from the vast majority of typical female jobs. Plus I'd be bored.



zee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,292
Location: on a cloud

01 Feb 2009, 1:32 pm

Haliphron wrote:

Zee: Concerning the 1st paragraph I really DONT think that social movements have the power to change men judging women on their appearance. Its become abundantly clear that such judgement is neurologically hardwired because there IS a correlation between physical beauty and genetic health. Men are expected to have good social skills and be financially stable, they're also expected to make the frist move when it comes to meeting women. But Im not going to whine and rant about that because women too are *wired* to want those traits in men and they're not gonna change just cuz some guys dont have them and think that its unfair. :wink:


Concerning your first sentence, I think the hippie movement is a good example of how a social movement can change what people consider attractive. If there were more natural women in advertising and the media, I think people's perceptions would change. And I don't see how a woman who modifies her natural body be removing hair, wearing makeup and ill-fitting clothes would appear to be "healthier".



zee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,292
Location: on a cloud

01 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm

MR_BOGAN wrote:

Yeah but women are not forced to shave their legs, wear make-up and high heels. They do it for their own vanity.
I'm not a big fan of make-up because in the long run women end up looking worse because the make-up damages their skin and also I know high heels are bad.

Men are expected to shave their faces and wear suit and tie in the business setting. Whenever I have grown facial hair I have had comments from women saying I look better without it..


Women do not do it for their "own vanity", they do it because it's expected and they don't want to be self-conscious.

Of course you need to dress appropriately in a business setting. But there's a difference in wearing business attire (which women also do) and having to wear heels and makeup and things which modify your appearance in an unhealthy way.


MR_BOGAN wrote:

So you are complaining here about getting treated better then. :lol:

The thing is men have to treat women differently than men because women are more sensitive and easier to upset.


No, I want to be treated equally, like one of the guys.
I know plenty of guys who are more sensitive and easier to upset than women. Look at some of the whiners on this thread, for instance.



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

01 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm

zee wrote:
If there were more natural women in advertising and the media, I think people's perceptions would change.


You mean television would become watchable again?

Actually, when I think about it, it reminds me of when Bob Barker chose to stop coloring his hair, followed by a bunch of other game show hosts... the natural look suited all of them better than the dyed hair if you ask me...



benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

01 Feb 2009, 2:35 pm

zee wrote:
MR_BOGAN wrote:

Yeah but women are not forced to shave their legs, wear make-up and high heels. They do it for their own vanity.
I'm not a big fan of make-up because in the long run women end up looking worse because the make-up damages their skin and also I know high heels are bad.

Men are expected to shave their faces and wear suit and tie in the business setting. Whenever I have grown facial hair I have had comments from women saying I look better without it..


Women do not do it for their "own vanity", they do it because it's expected and they don't want to be self-conscious.

Of course you need to dress appropriately in a business setting. But there's a difference in wearing business attire (which women also do) and having to wear heels and makeup and things which modify your appearance in an unhealthy way.


MR_BOGAN wrote:

So you are complaining here about getting treated better then. :lol:

The thing is men have to treat women differently than men because women are more sensitive and easier to upset.


No, I want to be treated equally, like one of the guys.
I know plenty of guys who are more sensitive and easier to upset than women. Look at some of the whiners on this thread, for instance.


We're just sick of the whining women.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

01 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm

benjimanbreeg wrote:

We're just sick of the whining women.


which is no more attractive than the smart alec whinging of small boys.

Merle


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

01 Feb 2009, 3:31 pm

zee wrote:
Haliphron wrote:

Zee: Concerning the 1st paragraph I really DONT think that social movements have the power to change men judging women on their appearance. Its become abundantly clear that such judgement is neurologically hardwired because there IS a correlation between physical beauty and genetic health. Men are expected to have good social skills and be financially stable, they're also expected to make the frist move when it comes to meeting women. But Im not going to whine and rant about that because women too are *wired* to want those traits in men and they're not gonna change just cuz some guys dont have them and think that its unfair. :wink:


Concerning your first sentence, I think the hippie movement is a good example of how a social movement can change what people consider attractive. If there were more natural women in advertising and the media, I think people's perceptions would change. And I don't see how a woman who modifies her natural body be removing hair, wearing makeup and ill-fitting clothes would appear to be "healthier".


You can't change what people find attractive, like what haliphron said it is neurologically hard wired, babies respond better to more attractive people. I agree with you about how their needs to be more natural women in advertising, with the whole super skinny model thing, I believe men are more neurologially attracted to more curvy women.



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

01 Feb 2009, 3:55 pm

zee wrote:
MR_BOGAN wrote:

Yeah but women are not forced to shave their legs, wear make-up and high heels. They do it for their own vanity.
I'm not a big fan of make-up because in the long run women end up looking worse because the make-up damages their skin and also I know high heels are bad.

Men are expected to shave their faces and wear suit and tie in the business setting. Whenever I have grown facial hair I have had comments from women saying I look better without it..


Women do not do it for their "own vanity", they do it because it's expected and they don't want to be self-conscious.

Of course you need to dress appropriately in a business setting. But there's a difference in wearing business attire (which women also do) and having to wear heels and makeup and things which modify your appearance in an unhealthy way.


It's the same thing, only women are more into appearence.

Women out of work really dress up. There is no pressures to dress up in their own time.



Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

01 Feb 2009, 4:34 pm

MR_BOGAN wrote:
zee wrote:
Haliphron wrote:

Zee: Concerning the 1st paragraph I really DONT think that social movements have the power to change men judging women on their appearance. Its become abundantly clear that such judgement is neurologically hardwired because there IS a correlation between physical beauty and genetic health. Men are expected to have good social skills and be financially stable, they're also expected to make the frist move when it comes to meeting women. But Im not going to whine and rant about that because women too are *wired* to want those traits in men and they're not gonna change just cuz some guys dont have them and think that its unfair. :wink:


Concerning your first sentence, I think the hippie movement is a good example of how a social movement can change what people consider attractive. If there were more natural women in advertising and the media, I think people's perceptions would change. And I don't see how a woman who modifies her natural body be removing hair, wearing makeup and ill-fitting clothes would appear to be "healthier".


You can't change what people find attractive, like what haliphron said it is neurologically hard wired, babies respond better to more attractive people. I agree with you about how their needs to be more natural women in advertising, with the whole super skinny model thing, I believe men are more neurologially attracted to more curvy women.


MR_BOGAN is right, zee. Sorry. :wink:
Makeup may not necessarily be natural, but just because it isnt "natural" DOES NOT make it a bad thing! Even in the hippie days of the late 60s and early 70s , obese hippies were STILL less desirable than the ones who were buxom but NOT bloated. Get rid of makeup and women will be judged on pure physical appearance. I hope you realize how much of a godsend makeup is for women who arent born with top-notch genes for physical beauty. The radical feminism of the 70s seems to have a socialist slant in its unrealistic goal of making All women equal among each other as well as equal with me. That just isnt gonna happen.



gina-ghettoprincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,669
Location: The Town That Time Forgot (UK)

01 Feb 2009, 4:38 pm

Haliphron wrote:
MR_BOGAN wrote:
zee wrote:
Haliphron wrote:

Zee: Concerning the 1st paragraph I really DONT think that social movements have the power to change men judging women on their appearance. Its become abundantly clear that such judgement is neurologically hardwired because there IS a correlation between physical beauty and genetic health. Men are expected to have good social skills and be financially stable, they're also expected to make the frist move when it comes to meeting women. But Im not going to whine and rant about that because women too are *wired* to want those traits in men and they're not gonna change just cuz some guys dont have them and think that its unfair. :wink:


Concerning your first sentence, I think the hippie movement is a good example of how a social movement can change what people consider attractive. If there were more natural women in advertising and the media, I think people's perceptions would change. And I don't see how a woman who modifies her natural body be removing hair, wearing makeup and ill-fitting clothes would appear to be "healthier".


You can't change what people find attractive, like what haliphron said it is neurologically hard wired, babies respond better to more attractive people. I agree with you about how their needs to be more natural women in advertising, with the whole super skinny model thing, I believe men are more neurologially attracted to more curvy women.


MR_BOGAN is right, zee. Sorry. :wink:
Makeup may not necessarily be natural, but just because it isnt "natural" DOES NOT make it a bad thing! Even in the hippie days of the late 60s and early 70s , obese hippies were STILL less desirable than the ones who were buxom but NOT bloated. Get rid of makeup and women will be judged on pure physical appearance. I hope you realize how much of a godsend makeup is for women who arent born with top-notch genes for physical beauty. The radical feminism of the 70s seems to have a socialist slant in its unrealistic goal of making All women equal among each other as well as equal with me. That just isnt gonna happen.


You're right...I don't get why people have a big thing about things that aren't "natural" being bad. We're an advanced civilisation, amirite?! We can improve things for the better, in all areas of life.


_________________
'El reloj, no avanza
y yo quiero ir a verte,
La clase, no acaba
y es como un semestre"


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

01 Feb 2009, 4:56 pm

gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
You're right...I don't get why people have a big thing about things that aren't "natural" being bad. We're an advanced civilisation, amirite?! We can improve things for the better, in all areas of life.


Because some people (like me) would rather have a pair of natural A-cups over the same pair artificially modified to the "more desirable" D's?



gina-ghettoprincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,669
Location: The Town That Time Forgot (UK)

01 Feb 2009, 5:00 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
You're right...I don't get why people have a big thing about things that aren't "natural" being bad. We're an advanced civilisation, amirite?! We can improve things for the better, in all areas of life.


Because some people (like me) would rather have a pair of natural A-cups over the same pair artificially modified to the "more desirable" D's?


You're also right. Some things are better left natural. But makeup is a minor and non-permanent modification.

(It's a myth that men find bigger breasts more attractive, BTW.)


_________________
'El reloj, no avanza
y yo quiero ir a verte,
La clase, no acaba
y es como un semestre"


mitharatowen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,675
Location: Arizona

01 Feb 2009, 5:08 pm

^ Edit to above

SOME men



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

01 Feb 2009, 5:24 pm

gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
ToadOfSteel wrote:
gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
You're right...I don't get why people have a big thing about things that aren't "natural" being bad. We're an advanced civilisation, amirite?! We can improve things for the better, in all areas of life.


Because some people (like me) would rather have a pair of natural A-cups over the same pair artificially modified to the "more desirable" D's?


You're also right. Some things are better left natural. But makeup is a minor and non-permanent modification.

(It's a myth that men find bigger breasts more attractive, BTW.)


Men don't like breast implants I know that for sure.