Which type would be more suitable for me given my looks?

Page 13 of 13 [ 202 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

24 Apr 2016, 6:38 am

If you want to annoy people, I think really disgusting pictures would be more effective.

I'd like to see a picture of plump, greasy barbecued penguin. Whale would be nice, too.

_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.

Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

24 Apr 2016, 8:08 am

CommanderKeen wrote:

Aristophanes wrote:

CommanderKeen wrote:

Aristophanes wrote:

CommanderKeen wrote:

Aristophanes wrote:

@NurseAngela. You seem to be missing the point-- it's not how one looks, it's how much value one attaches to those looks. The fact is that if one spends all their time attempting to "look good" then they're probably not offering anything else, since all their time is spent on looks. Yes, you can tell that from a picture. There's nothing wrong with looking good, but if your entire life is based on that, then yeah you don't really have much to offer aside from that. That's where high maintenance comes into play: a person who's only goal is to look good needs constant reassurance that they do indeed look good. Sorry, but that's tedious and high maintenance. So yeah, if I were a dater, I'd go for the girl that doesn't spend half the day attempting to look like a super model and spends that time doing something she actually enjoys-- that's something a potential partner can bond with. I'd rather spend my time doing some activity we both enjoy than spending my time reassuring someone that they do indeed look good.

This is a stupid statement. Look at how many athletes have enhanced their lives through fitness. Take Dolph Lundgren for example. Did you know that he's a chemical engineer? He also knows 5 languages and 5 forms of martial arts, not to mention he's an actor.

Cool, you found an anomaly-- they do exist.

Arnold, Stallone, The Rock, Any wrestler, any sports player, any martial artists. is that enough?

Yep, I'm sure they're all rocket scientists under the blob of protein and they're all just misunderstood.

Booo hooo hoo. Would you like a tissue for your tears? You've never even told us if you'll ever tried to get in shape. You're really judgmental over people who work to get and stay in shape. There must be an underlining reason for this. By the way and this goes for anyone, until you have actually calorie counted and attempted to get in shape; you have no right to complain. I'm not even in the shape I want to be in..YET.

You're making a lot of assumptions there buddy. I work in agriculture-- I actually use my body for work. It's the size, shape, and weight it needs to be to get my work done, no more, no less. And yeah, I'll take it over a muscle-bound physique any day, because my body is built for work, not a vanity show.

CommanderKeen
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 May 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138

24 Apr 2016, 9:13 am

Gee, you don't sound bitter at all. You have this attitude that you're better than people who want to be in shape, or be strong. Common sense tells me, you wouldn't have this hatred without having some past negative experience.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

24 Apr 2016, 10:01 am

Nothing wrong with being in shape.

Something wrong with lambasting people who aren't in as good a shape as you.

Or in lambasting people who don't believe mere physical conditioning is the "end-all."

There are people who work hard, say, in construction or in their trades in general. They don't need all those extra supplements or time in the gym.

Cave men got enough exercise through the hunt alone; they didn't need to do Pilates.

Exercise is for relatively sedentary people (like probably most people in the "first world") who don't get enough exercise through their daily activities alone.

I'm in fair-to-middling shape for my age. I know I need to exercise more.

But "being in shape" isn't the end-all for people.

People have to have attributes other than their physical conditioning abilities.

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

24 Apr 2016, 3:08 pm

CommanderKeen wrote:

I don't really have a dislike for people wanting to get in shap or being in shape but for the attitude that most often accompanies it that they'll way of life is the best and they must shame and taunt you if your not in shape or getting into shap, that I dislike and causes me to dislike them.

Why not live your life your way and let others live theirs their way. Probably same of product wars. In order to feel good about themselves and their choice they have to make others feel bad.

" I spend 4 hours a day working out to be in shape,but that fat bastard is just as happy and well off as me wtf, well I'll make him feel bad and join me in working out 4 hours a day"

PennyFri
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 22 Apr 2016
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 53
Location: Australia

25 Apr 2016, 12:17 am

I've noticed that men with muscular builds tend to worry about body fat and make lots of comments about being "fat." Men with lean builds seem to worry about looking "scrawny" and make comments about "bulking up." Even if they act confident in public, the majority of men I've known have still voiced concerns about their appearance behind closed doors. Sometimes it makes me less comfortable around them. If a person is judging themselves so harshly, I wonder if they are judging me in the same way.

Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

25 Apr 2016, 8:34 am

nurseangela wrote:

How about bonding through exercise?

And the point that's being missed is thinking that cheerleaders, models and actresses do nothing more than their looks. Cheerleaders in the big universities have to keep a certain grade point average. I keep saying stuff because I think men give women a hard time and they give them mixed signals. They want the "girl next door" type to marry, but they really want to bang the good-looking cheerleader type. They need to make up their minds and start going after the homely-looking girls and quit watching Victoria's Secret models and buying the latest swim-suit issue of the hottest babes cause men keep talking out of both sides of their mouth, imo.
And I'll say it again - if you think you know a person just from a picture then you're only fooling yourself and probably are missing out on a lot of decent people.

Don't assume every guy wants to 'bang the good-looking cheerleader type', that is ridiculous. I know my boyfriend prefers the good looking petite/short metalhead type which is the category I fit in. Really we just specifically prefer each other to anyone else. Why is it people assume it's seen as homely by everyone if you're don't look like a cheerleader, model or particularly good looking actress?

Also of course actresses act, play roles and all that, and they aren't all good looking by default anyways, models don't have to keep a grade point average or do acting or anything they literally just have to look good in front of the camera.

_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.

SportsGamer35728
Velociraptor

Joined: 6 Oct 2015
Posts: 444
Location: Vice City

21 Oct 2016, 5:19 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:

Cheerleaders won't date geeks, be real.

What about female jocks?

biostructure
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,456

22 Oct 2016, 8:43 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:

Now more on topic...

This is a great example of a woman who is conventionally "hot" but totally not my type. I like much cuter/sweeter looking and "girl next door" types.

I_Heart_Unicorns
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 13 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 60

26 Oct 2016, 10:09 am

SportsGamer35728 wrote:

While on a trip to Boston this weekend, I took these pictures at a Boston Celtics game and tattoo convention that happen to be held in the hotel I was staying at with, respectively a pair of Celtics cheerleaders/dancers, and a pair of alternative/tattoo models. My question is, based on my appearance, which of these would be more suitable for me from a relationship standpoint?

Well based on your picture, check these babes out:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=black ... Ap8Q_AUIBQ

_________________
It were proper bo I tell thee

Page 13 of 13 [ 202 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Jump to:

Which type would be more suitable for me given my looks? Post Reply New Topic

Which type would be more suitable for me given my looks?