The irrational standards women have toward men

Post Reply New Topic

Reasons why women and men are judged according to different scales.

Very many women can get sex very very easily, while only few guys can actually get sex easily. For guys, being very succesful is a requirement, or the small handful of guys who are just born incredibly handsome, but this percentage is very low: So in summary, for most guys it requires an incredible amount of work, or winning the genetic lottery to reach a place of easy access to sex. This is not the case for women. I would say probably 80-90 % of women could get sex easily, even if they were unemployed and broke.

Add to that, that even when the guy has the right foundation, it is still him who in 90% of cases has to initiate the conversation, be creative and charismatic to win over the woman. It is also still expected that the guy pays for eventual dates. There's a dissproportionate amount of effort and sacrifice, on every step of the way to the bedroom. It might be different for male moviestars and rockstars, but they are outliers to say the least, and it's not very useful to focus on something that only applies to 0.001% of all men.

So it is not so much having sex with the woman that is the achievement, it is all the hard work and achievements made to reach the point where the sex was even possible.
I know alot of you women will try to argue against what I'm saying here, but I think if you're completely honest with yourselves, you will agree that it is not the same, hence men get called studs, and women sluts. Not saying it's right or wrong, just exlaining why this is the case.

Interesting. I appreciate the clarification.

Yes, there's definitely a disconnect between the level of effort required for men vs. women to accumulate a large number of sexual partners. I have noted that many people put extra effort and attention into getting things that are more difficult for them to acquire, and sometimes wonder if the general perception that men want more sex/have a greater libido than women is due at least in part to that disparity. (If other words, in a society where men and women experienced sexual equality with regard to available partners and initiation of encounters, would men still want more sex than women?) I digress.

So if I understand you correctly, you're saying the reason men admire and envy other men who are more successful sexually is because of the awareness that they've had to work harder for it, while the same number of encounters is relatively easy for women to achieve and therefore not deserving of the same admiration. Yes?

To be honest, I’ve been thinking a lot about the endless stream of typically young guys who come in here to vent their frustrations with dating. I, as well as others have often tried to help them, but I have come to the conclusion that we shouldn’t.

If a person with a pervasive social development disorder who knows they have such a disorder posseses such a level of cognitive dissonance that have redefined normal and average to pertain to themselves rather than admit they are outliers to avoid facing the reality that normal average people are dating marrying and having sex in en mass, and they are not, by virtue of the fact that they are socially delayed alone, and their shortcomings are internal rather than external, these are individuals who, in their present mindset, lack the capacity to grow as people and should not be in relationships because they are not at a place where they would be able to Maintain one. They lack the necessary social fitness And few of them seem to never acquire it due to There in ability to Look them selves in the mirror and admit that they are not average and the problem is with them and not anyone else. While they are here trying to distort statistics To meet their comfortable delusion, the bulk of the human population is doing as it always did, having relationships marrying having sex and perpetuating the human species.

Edit this into the first post and close the thread. Thread is over. Well done.