Page 14 of 34 [ 543 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 34  Next

magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

13 Mar 2018, 9:48 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
You can give me 50 bowls of chocolate ice cream, but, seeing as how I hate chocolate ice cream, it's not going to make me "happy." Screaming at me that, "At least you got ice cream!" is a waste of time for both of us.

A point I have tried to make a number of times also, but perhaps never with a useful analogy. I like it.

There are some men in this forum who have indicated they would be happy with any woman, with any type of interest, etc. I get it, they want *something*. But for a man to say women are luckier to get this *something*, just because that man would be happy with it, makes little sense.

Is each individual getting their individual wants met - that is the more important thing to explore, IMO. (And of course, what might be the best solution for each individual, if they're not.)



So finding 1000 apples of varying qualities while you're in the desert with no food, from which few may be edible while others are not and probably a handle of them may be perfect ...... is worse than finding 0 apple in the desert.

And now imagine you're a cat. Apples are no food for you.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

13 Mar 2018, 10:54 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
You can give me 50 bowls of chocolate ice cream, but, seeing as how I hate chocolate ice cream, it's not going to make me "happy." Screaming at me that, "At least you got ice cream!" is a waste of time for both of us.

A point I have tried to make a number of times also, but perhaps never with a useful analogy. I like it.

There are some men in this forum who have indicated they would be happy with any woman, with any type of interest, etc. I get it, they want *something*. But for a man to say women are luckier to get this *something*, just because that man would be happy with it, makes little sense.

Is each individual getting their individual wants met - that is the more important thing to explore, IMO. (And of course, what might be the best solution for each individual, if they're not.)

So finding 1000 apples of varying qualities while you're in the desert with no food, from which few may be edible while others are not and probably a handle of them may be perfect ...... is worse than finding 0 apple in the desert.

Ahhh the logic that you two have.

yellowtamarin , XFG's post would make sense if ALL guys on dating site are horrible - but you know that it's not the case, there's always a better probability to find what you want among any number, than among null. It's just mathematical.

I'm not sure you read my post properly, because if you compare mine and yours you can clearly see you've either misinterpreted or chosen to skip parts.

See where I said that I get that these men want *something* (any type of apple at all)? That that is what would make them happy. But that same thing isn't what makes everyone happy.

No, setting up my dating profile so that I get lots of messages does not open it up for a few "perfect" people to get in touch with me or respond to me. It sets it up to exclude them. They are not interested in the me I present when I do it that way. Just like if I walk around wearing a heap of makeup or with Botox lips. I'm not bagging makeup and Botox, I'm saying that it's a turn-off for the type of person I want to date.

And for me, dating someone just "edible" is worse than dating nobody at all. So what you are calling 'surviving in the desert' is, for me, poisoning myself a little. Like drinking sea water - it's best to not drink at all even if that's the only water available.

So to reiterate - people want, even need, different things. Telling someone they are lucky to have things that you want, but they don't want, is not a useful complaint.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Mar 2018, 11:06 am

magz wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
You can give me 50 bowls of chocolate ice cream, but, seeing as how I hate chocolate ice cream, it's not going to make me "happy." Screaming at me that, "At least you got ice cream!" is a waste of time for both of us.

A point I have tried to make a number of times also, but perhaps never with a useful analogy. I like it.

There are some men in this forum who have indicated they would be happy with any woman, with any type of interest, etc. I get it, they want *something*. But for a man to say women are luckier to get this *something*, just because that man would be happy with it, makes little sense.

Is each individual getting their individual wants met - that is the more important thing to explore, IMO. (And of course, what might be the best solution for each individual, if they're not.)



So finding 1000 apples of varying qualities while you're in the desert with no food, from which few may be edible while others are not and probably a handle of them may be perfect ...... is worse than finding 0 apple in the desert.

And now imagine you're a cat. Apples are no food for you.



“there's always a better probability to find what you want among any number, than among null. It's just mathematical” / end of discussion.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Mar 2018, 12:31 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
magz wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
You can give me 50 bowls of chocolate ice cream, but, seeing as how I hate chocolate ice cream, it's not going to make me "happy." Screaming at me that, "At least you got ice cream!" is a waste of time for both of us.

A point I have tried to make a number of times also, but perhaps never with a useful analogy. I like it.

There are some men in this forum who have indicated they would be happy with any woman, with any type of interest, etc. I get it, they want *something*. But for a man to say women are luckier to get this *something*, just because that man would be happy with it, makes little sense.

Is each individual getting their individual wants met - that is the more important thing to explore, IMO. (And of course, what might be the best solution for each individual, if they're not.)



So finding 1000 apples of varying qualities while you're in the desert with no food, from which few may be edible while others are not and probably a handle of them may be perfect ...... is worse than finding 0 apple in the desert.

And now imagine you're a cat. Apples are no food for you.



“there's always a better probability to find what you want among any number, than among null. It's just mathematical” / end of discussion.


Men aren't women, women aren't men.

/thread


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Mar 2018, 12:46 pm

yellowtamarin wrote:
I'm not sure you read my post properly, because if you compare mine and yours you can clearly see you've either misinterpreted or chosen to skip parts.

See where I said that I get that these men want *something* (any type of apple at all)? That that is what would make them happy. But that same thing isn't what makes everyone happy.

No, setting up my dating profile so that I get lots of messages does not open it up for a few "perfect" people to get in touch with me or respond to me. It sets it up to exclude them. They are not interested in the me I present when I do it that way. Just like if I walk around wearing a heap of makeup or with Botox lips. I'm not bagging makeup and Botox, I'm saying that it's a turn-off for the type of person I want to date.

And for me, dating someone just "edible" is worse than dating nobody at all. So what you are calling 'surviving in the desert' is, for me, poisoning myself a little. Like drinking sea water - it's best to not drink at all even if that's the only water available.

So to reiterate - people want, even need, different things. Telling someone they are lucky to have things that you want, but they don't want, is not a useful complaint.


A few years ago, I was in Las Vegas on a military training exercise.

A few of my buddies and I decided to go out on the strip, and we were joined by some other people from different squadrons. There was this one guy who kept kissing me, hanging on me, and throwing his arm around me. Me, not being very practiced at fending off male attention (a fact I suspect he sensed), just tried to stay away from him, but the more I attempted to avoid him, the more he continued. Finally, at the end of the night, I caught a cab back to my hotel room, and went to bed. About two hours later, I heard the door open, and my roommate's voice.

She brought the same guy back to our room. :evil: She immediately leaves to go get ice, while leaving this idiot alone with me. I tried to go back to sleep, but he actually crawls into bed with me and started kissing me! I finally yelled at him to leave me the hell alone, which he found very funny, but, by that time, my roommate had returned, and he occupied himself with her for the rest of the night.

My point: the typical Wrong Planet guy would read my experience and reply, "So what? If a woman had done that to me, I'd feel FLATTERED and VALIDATED that she was paying attention to me! You girls have it SSOOO easy!"

The Logic being, of course, that since he, as a man, would've enjoyed it, I, as a woman, should've too. Unfortunately, at this point, I doubt there will ever being a shortage of men on here who are going to wag their finger in female's faces, and lecture us about our life experience as well as how we're supposed to feel about them.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
magz wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
You can give me 50 bowls of chocolate ice cream, but, seeing as how I hate chocolate ice cream, it's not going to make me "happy." Screaming at me that, "At least you got ice cream!" is a waste of time for both of us.

A point I have tried to make a number of times also, but perhaps never with a useful analogy. I like it.

There are some men in this forum who have indicated they would be happy with any woman, with any type of interest, etc. I get it, they want *something*. But for a man to say women are luckier to get this *something*, just because that man would be happy with it, makes little sense.

Is each individual getting their individual wants met - that is the more important thing to explore, IMO. (And of course, what might be the best solution for each individual, if they're not.)



So finding 1000 apples of varying qualities while you're in the desert with no food, from which few may be edible while others are not and probably a handle of them may be perfect ...... is worse than finding 0 apple in the desert.

And now imagine you're a cat. Apples are no food for you.



“there's always a better probability to find what you want among any number, than among null. It's just mathematical” / end of discussion.


Men aren't women, women aren't men.

/thread


Cats aren’t dogs, dogs aren’t cats.

/L&D



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Mar 2018, 1:41 pm

Quote:
My point: the typical Wrong Planet guy would read my experience and reply, "So what? If a woman had done that to me, I'd feel FLATTERED and VALIDATED that she was paying attention to me! You girls have it SSOOO easy!"


No, the typical wp guys would say this is a sexual assault.

Stop putting stuff in their mouths.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Mar 2018, 1:50 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
My point: the typical Wrong Planet guy would read my experience and reply, "So what? If a woman had done that to me, I'd feel FLATTERED and VALIDATED that she was paying attention to me! You girls have it SSOOO easy!"


No, the typical wp guys would say this is a sexual assault.

Stop putting stuff in their mouths.


No, many of them had already said similar things.

I've been here too long to been mislead by bullsh_t.

The sentiment, "Women should regard the world exactly like men," is quite strong.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
My point: the typical Wrong Planet guy would read my experience and reply, "So what? If a woman had done that to me, I'd feel FLATTERED and VALIDATED that she was paying attention to me! You girls have it SSOOO easy!"


No, the typical wp guys would say this is a sexual assault.

Stop putting stuff in their mouths.


No, many of them had already said similar things.

I've been here too long to been mislead by bullsh_t.

The sentiment, "Women should regard the world exactly like men," is quite strong.


Ok, whatever makes you happy.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

13 Mar 2018, 1:55 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
My point: the typical Wrong Planet guy would read my experience and reply, "So what? If a woman had done that to me, I'd feel FLATTERED and VALIDATED that she was paying attention to me! You girls have it SSOOO easy!"


No, the typical wp guys would say this is a sexual assault.

Stop putting stuff in their mouths.


No, many of them had already said similar things.

I've been here too long to been mislead by bullsh_t.

The sentiment, "Women should regard the world exactly like men," is quite strong.


Ok, whatever makes you happy.


The truth always makes me happy.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Mar 2018, 5:59 pm

We don't want to be with just any woman. We have standards. We just want more choice so we can choose the right woman.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

13 Mar 2018, 6:15 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
We don't want to be with just any woman. We have standards. We just want more choice so we can choose the right woman.

My hypothesis is that for those who have standards, they should do things to attract the right people, not do things to simply attract more people. Attracting "more women" doesn't necessarily put the right woman in that mix.

Is it really "more choice" that you want, or is it the right woman that you want? What if you were able to attract her and only her? You have no choice in that scenario, just her, so is that a bad outcome?



Theamazinggeek
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 136
Location: Salinas, california

13 Mar 2018, 7:02 pm

Wow blown off, over looked twice in the same thread! The last few post are saying the same thing i said in my previous post. Wow!

Meanwhile alot of the posts and alot of this bickering makes me wonder ... is this the reason im still single.

Bickering, gender blaming ....

Is this holding us back? Thick headedness. Xfilesgeek is one on a crusade defending against 3.

Someone take responsibility or make a change !


_________________
*Pour a martinelli apple cider bottle into a wine glass. Puts down momentaryly poetry book next to philosophy book.

"Im search of answers, new marvels, and new questions to ask."


Last edited by Theamazinggeek on 13 Mar 2018, 10:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,185
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Mar 2018, 8:13 pm

yellowtamarin wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
We don't want to be with just any woman. We have standards. We just want more choice so we can choose the right woman.

My hypothesis is that for those who have standards, they should do things to attract the right people, not do things to simply attract more people. Attracting "more women" doesn't necessarily put the right woman in that mix.

Is it really "more choice" that you want, or is it the right woman that you want? What if you were able to attract her and only her? You have no choice in that scenario, just her, so is that a bad outcome?

I guess that's not a bad outcome but I'm not sure how to attract the right kind of woman. So far, all of my efforts at self-improvement have only served to increase the quantity of women I attract but not the quality.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Theamazinggeek
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 136
Location: Salinas, california

13 Mar 2018, 11:24 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
We don't want to be with just any woman. We have standards. We just want more choice so we can choose the right woman.

My hypothesis is that for those who have standards, they should do things to attract the right people, not do things to simply attract more people. Attracting "more women" doesn't necessarily put the right woman in that mix.

Is it really "more choice" that you want, or is it the right woman that you want? What if you were able to attract her and only her? You have no choice in that scenario, just her, so is that a bad outcome?

I guess that's not a bad outcome but I'm not sure how to attract the right kind of woman. So far, all of my efforts at self-improvement have only served to increase the quantity of women I attract but not the quality.


I wouldnt use the word quality when describing women. Try "type of women". Or odds are youll be ostracized by women and the room your standing in. Ive seen a friend socked in the shoulder for less. Respect n good word usage shows maturity so again type not quality.


_________________
*Pour a martinelli apple cider bottle into a wine glass. Puts down momentaryly poetry book next to philosophy book.

"Im search of answers, new marvels, and new questions to ask."


314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

14 Mar 2018, 12:19 am

yellowtamarin wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
We don't want to be with just any woman. We have standards. We just want more choice so we can choose the right woman.

My hypothesis is that for those who have standards, they should do things to attract the right people, not do things to simply attract more people. Attracting "more women" doesn't necessarily put the right woman in that mix.

Is it really "more choice" that you want, or is it the right woman that you want? What if you were able to attract her and only her? You have no choice in that scenario, just her, so is that a bad outcome?

If you attract no one, then your goal is to attract someone. Bad outcome is attracting nobody, because nobody is certainly not the ideal partner. Trust me. I've spent years with her!