13 Jun 2012, 11:55 pm
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating 
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
14 Jun 2012, 12:03 am
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
Even I say "Hurray! Boobies!" when I see boobies. Well, not really.
14 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Kinme wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
Even I say "Hurray! Boobies!" when I see boobies. Well, not really.
Haha, okay, who doesn't, really?!
14 Jun 2012, 12:17 am
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
Even I say "Hurray! Boobies!" when I see boobies. Well, not really.
Haha, okay, who doesn't, really?!
Well, so long as I can smack the crap out of them, I'm okay with boobies.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,453
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
14 Jun 2012, 1:28 am
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
My success rate increased like 300%
From like 1-2 replies per couple of weeks to....
old days: http://i.imgur.com/Xz9Bq.png
Now??
Let me estimate...
At least 5 to 10 messages per day.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 14 Jun 2012, 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,453
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
14 Jun 2012, 1:33 am
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Haha. If he has his top off I most definitely will never message him, or reply to his message, that's for sure!! (But that's a whole different thread.)
Quote:
I am replying this in the other relevant okcupid thread.
Based on OKTrends, you can tell that the number of girls who find a shirtless pic offensive is less than the number of girls who would love to reply to a guy with a shirtless pic.
And this exactly how my experience was, in fact the few girls who found my shirtless pic offensive are the same girls who never messaged or replied to me when I had a modest geeky-style clothed profile pic.
So where's the loss here? not much.
And please, pre-spare me the quality over quantity speech, the girls being interested in me there are not at all the empty-headed shallow girls.
Surprisingly, MOST of them are well-educated liberal feminists (strongest prospects: a feminist journalist with geeky interests living in beirut , an atheist lebanese architect, a rebellious atheist egyptian who lived in Beirut before , an extremely liberal mexican into the Levant political science who visited the region and Lebanon several times and will again....etc), the ones who found my pic offensive were more of the conservative religious type.
Yes, maybe there are many girls like you that would skip a guy because of his shirtless pic, but that doesn't automatically mean that they would message/reply him if he had a normal pic, in fact it's not likely they would since from what i gather here, girls are very selective in replying/messaging.
ON THE OTHER HAND, a lot of girls would get a spark while seeing a shirtless pic and because of this spark they'd message/reply him, something that wouldn't happen if the same guy had a normal pic.
Yes, I have certainly read with interest your success with the shirtless pic.
Most of my female friends would be turned off by that sort of pic (btw I have not seen YOUR pic, I'm talking about any guy). I do have one friend who is very smart, attractive, etc. etc. who probably would go for it. I also consider her somewhat naive in the dating world, and worry a bit about the sort of guy she might hook up with by the way I have seen her browse profiles on Oasis. *shrug*
Not having a topless pic certainly doesn't guarantee a reply from me. In fact, I'm extremely fussy. But a topless pic gives a guy much less chance than no topless pic. I have AS, so of course I am not a typical female. It appears that the typical female likes to see the shirt off. Cool.
I heard a lot of such claims online by females, claiming that all or most of their female friends would be turn off by that sort of pic.
Hmm
Are you certain of that, yellow? Are you all certain of this?
You have to realize that what people claim isn't the same what they really do behind the doors.
I can guarantee you that some of those who claim they're turned off, would drool or fap over some shirtless guy on the screen (or did when they were singles) :p.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 14 Jun 2012, 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
14 Jun 2012, 1:34 am
Kinme wrote:
Well, so long as I can smack the crap out of them, I'm okay with boobies.
... and *I* need a censor?
Boobie abuse!
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,453
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
14 Jun 2012, 1:45 am
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
Frankly, my first reaction would be "are they real?"
Then I might message her asking her that.
14 Jun 2012, 1:48 am
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Frankly, my first reaction would be "are they real?"
Then I might message her asking her that.
Then I might message her asking her that.
[reply:] At the price I paid for them, they'd BETTER be real!
14 Jun 2012, 1:51 am
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Haha. If he has his top off I most definitely will never message him, or reply to his message, that's for sure!! (But that's a whole different thread.)
Quote:
I am replying this in the other relevant okcupid thread.
Based on OKTrends, you can tell that the number of girls who find a shirtless pic offensive is less than the number of girls who would love to reply to a guy with a shirtless pic.
And this exactly how my experience was, in fact the few girls who found my shirtless pic offensive are the same girls who never messaged or replied to me when I had a modest geeky-style clothed profile pic.
So where's the loss here? not much.
And please, pre-spare me the quality over quantity speech, the girls being interested in me there are not at all the empty-headed shallow girls.
Surprisingly, MOST of them are well-educated liberal feminists (strongest prospects: a feminist journalist with geeky interests living in beirut , an atheist lebanese architect, a rebellious atheist egyptian who lived in Beirut before , an extremely liberal mexican into the Levant political science who visited the region and Lebanon several times and will again....etc), the ones who found my pic offensive were more of the conservative religious type.
Yes, maybe there are many girls like you that would skip a guy because of his shirtless pic, but that doesn't automatically mean that they would message/reply him if he had a normal pic, in fact it's not likely they would since from what i gather here, girls are very selective in replying/messaging.
ON THE OTHER HAND, a lot of girls would get a spark while seeing a shirtless pic and because of this spark they'd message/reply him, something that wouldn't happen if the same guy had a normal pic.
Yes, I have certainly read with interest your success with the shirtless pic.
Most of my female friends would be turned off by that sort of pic (btw I have not seen YOUR pic, I'm talking about any guy). I do have one friend who is very smart, attractive, etc. etc. who probably would go for it. I also consider her somewhat naive in the dating world, and worry a bit about the sort of guy she might hook up with by the way I have seen her browse profiles on Oasis. *shrug*
Not having a topless pic certainly doesn't guarantee a reply from me. In fact, I'm extremely fussy. But a topless pic gives a guy much less chance than no topless pic. I have AS, so of course I am not a typical female. It appears that the typical female likes to see the shirt off. Cool.
I heard a lot of such claims online by females, claiming that all or most of their female friends would be turn off by that sort of pic.
Hmm
Are you certain of that, yellow? Are you all certain of this?
You have to realize that what people claim isn't the same what they really do behind the doors.
I can guarantee you that some of those who claim they're turned off, would drool or fap over some shirtless guy on the screen (or did when they were singles) :p.
I do tend to have a very particulat type of friend, as I can't tolerate many people. As I said, it seems typical females are into it. And typical females are more common than my type of friend, so it makes sense that the topless pic would work. Just won't work on us awesome chicks
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,453
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
14 Jun 2012, 2:14 am
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Haha. If he has his top off I most definitely will never message him, or reply to his message, that's for sure!! (But that's a whole different thread.)
Quote:
I am replying this in the other relevant okcupid thread.
Based on OKTrends, you can tell that the number of girls who find a shirtless pic offensive is less than the number of girls who would love to reply to a guy with a shirtless pic.
And this exactly how my experience was, in fact the few girls who found my shirtless pic offensive are the same girls who never messaged or replied to me when I had a modest geeky-style clothed profile pic.
So where's the loss here? not much.
And please, pre-spare me the quality over quantity speech, the girls being interested in me there are not at all the empty-headed shallow girls.
Surprisingly, MOST of them are well-educated liberal feminists (strongest prospects: a feminist journalist with geeky interests living in beirut , an atheist lebanese architect, a rebellious atheist egyptian who lived in Beirut before , an extremely liberal mexican into the Levant political science who visited the region and Lebanon several times and will again....etc), the ones who found my pic offensive were more of the conservative religious type.
Yes, maybe there are many girls like you that would skip a guy because of his shirtless pic, but that doesn't automatically mean that they would message/reply him if he had a normal pic, in fact it's not likely they would since from what i gather here, girls are very selective in replying/messaging.
ON THE OTHER HAND, a lot of girls would get a spark while seeing a shirtless pic and because of this spark they'd message/reply him, something that wouldn't happen if the same guy had a normal pic.
Yes, I have certainly read with interest your success with the shirtless pic.
Most of my female friends would be turned off by that sort of pic (btw I have not seen YOUR pic, I'm talking about any guy). I do have one friend who is very smart, attractive, etc. etc. who probably would go for it. I also consider her somewhat naive in the dating world, and worry a bit about the sort of guy she might hook up with by the way I have seen her browse profiles on Oasis. *shrug*
Not having a topless pic certainly doesn't guarantee a reply from me. In fact, I'm extremely fussy. But a topless pic gives a guy much less chance than no topless pic. I have AS, so of course I am not a typical female. It appears that the typical female likes to see the shirt off. Cool.
I heard a lot of such claims online by females, claiming that all or most of their female friends would be turn off by that sort of pic.
Hmm
Are you certain of that, yellow? Are you all certain of this?
You have to realize that what people claim isn't the same what they really do behind the doors.
I can guarantee you that some of those who claim they're turned off, would drool or fap over some shirtless guy on the screen (or did when they were singles) :p.
I do tend to have a very particulat type of friend, as I can't tolerate many people. As I said, it seems typical females are into it. And typical females are more common than my type of friend, so it makes sense that the topless pic would work. Just won't work on us awesome chicks
PM me your okcupid username (or maybe some of your awesome friends'
).
14 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
14 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Haha. If he has his top off I most definitely will never message him, or reply to his message, that's for sure!! (But that's a whole different thread.)
Quote:
I am replying this in the other relevant okcupid thread.
Based on OKTrends, you can tell that the number of girls who find a shirtless pic offensive is less than the number of girls who would love to reply to a guy with a shirtless pic.
And this exactly how my experience was, in fact the few girls who found my shirtless pic offensive are the same girls who never messaged or replied to me when I had a modest geeky-style clothed profile pic.
So where's the loss here? not much.
And please, pre-spare me the quality over quantity speech, the girls being interested in me there are not at all the empty-headed shallow girls.
Surprisingly, MOST of them are well-educated liberal feminists (strongest prospects: a feminist journalist with geeky interests living in beirut , an atheist lebanese architect, a rebellious atheist egyptian who lived in Beirut before , an extremely liberal mexican into the Levant political science who visited the region and Lebanon several times and will again....etc), the ones who found my pic offensive were more of the conservative religious type.
Yes, maybe there are many girls like you that would skip a guy because of his shirtless pic, but that doesn't automatically mean that they would message/reply him if he had a normal pic, in fact it's not likely they would since from what i gather here, girls are very selective in replying/messaging.
ON THE OTHER HAND, a lot of girls would get a spark while seeing a shirtless pic and because of this spark they'd message/reply him, something that wouldn't happen if the same guy had a normal pic.
Yes, I have certainly read with interest your success with the shirtless pic.
Most of my female friends would be turned off by that sort of pic (btw I have not seen YOUR pic, I'm talking about any guy). I do have one friend who is very smart, attractive, etc. etc. who probably would go for it. I also consider her somewhat naive in the dating world, and worry a bit about the sort of guy she might hook up with by the way I have seen her browse profiles on Oasis. *shrug*
Not having a topless pic certainly doesn't guarantee a reply from me. In fact, I'm extremely fussy. But a topless pic gives a guy much less chance than no topless pic. I have AS, so of course I am not a typical female. It appears that the typical female likes to see the shirt off. Cool.
I heard a lot of such claims online by females, claiming that all or most of their female friends would be turn off by that sort of pic.
Hmm
Are you certain of that, yellow? Are you all certain of this?
You have to realize that what people claim isn't the same what they really do behind the doors.
I can guarantee you that some of those who claim they're turned off, would drool or fap over some shirtless guy on the screen (or did when they were singles) :p.
Drool or fap, probably.
Talk to? That's a dfiferent story.
There's a difference between masturbation material and relationship material.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,453
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
14 Jun 2012, 5:19 pm
Who_Am_I wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
Haha. If he has his top off I most definitely will never message him, or reply to his message, that's for sure!! (But that's a whole different thread.)
Quote:
I am replying this in the other relevant okcupid thread.
Based on OKTrends, you can tell that the number of girls who find a shirtless pic offensive is less than the number of girls who would love to reply to a guy with a shirtless pic.
And this exactly how my experience was, in fact the few girls who found my shirtless pic offensive are the same girls who never messaged or replied to me when I had a modest geeky-style clothed profile pic.
So where's the loss here? not much.
And please, pre-spare me the quality over quantity speech, the girls being interested in me there are not at all the empty-headed shallow girls.
Surprisingly, MOST of them are well-educated liberal feminists (strongest prospects: a feminist journalist with geeky interests living in beirut , an atheist lebanese architect, a rebellious atheist egyptian who lived in Beirut before , an extremely liberal mexican into the Levant political science who visited the region and Lebanon several times and will again....etc), the ones who found my pic offensive were more of the conservative religious type.
Yes, maybe there are many girls like you that would skip a guy because of his shirtless pic, but that doesn't automatically mean that they would message/reply him if he had a normal pic, in fact it's not likely they would since from what i gather here, girls are very selective in replying/messaging.
ON THE OTHER HAND, a lot of girls would get a spark while seeing a shirtless pic and because of this spark they'd message/reply him, something that wouldn't happen if the same guy had a normal pic.
Yes, I have certainly read with interest your success with the shirtless pic.
Most of my female friends would be turned off by that sort of pic (btw I have not seen YOUR pic, I'm talking about any guy). I do have one friend who is very smart, attractive, etc. etc. who probably would go for it. I also consider her somewhat naive in the dating world, and worry a bit about the sort of guy she might hook up with by the way I have seen her browse profiles on Oasis. *shrug*
Not having a topless pic certainly doesn't guarantee a reply from me. In fact, I'm extremely fussy. But a topless pic gives a guy much less chance than no topless pic. I have AS, so of course I am not a typical female. It appears that the typical female likes to see the shirt off. Cool.
I heard a lot of such claims online by females, claiming that all or most of their female friends would be turn off by that sort of pic.
Hmm
Are you certain of that, yellow? Are you all certain of this?
You have to realize that what people claim isn't the same what they really do behind the doors.
I can guarantee you that some of those who claim they're turned off, would drool or fap over some shirtless guy on the screen (or did when they were singles) :p.
Drool or fap, probably.
Talk to? That's a dfiferent story.
There's a difference between masturbation material and relationship material.
LOL yea right.
You're wrong, I am telling you, and i don't feel like to share regarding this....
But
If the drooling material is reachable then why wouldn't they try? it's totally illogical to not to.
14 Jun 2012, 6:40 pm
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
Kinme wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
Nope, many guys get scared off because she's a crazy exhibitionist.
I always pictured those guys saying "Hurray! Boobies!"
They do. Then they get scared off. I think that's how it works. But I'm almost positive that any straight guy says (even if it's in his head) "Hooray! Boobies!" whenever he sees some.
Even I say "Hurray! Boobies!" when I see boobies. Well, not really.
Haha, okay, who doesn't, really?!
I do and I'm borderline asexual
14 Jun 2012, 8:02 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
JanuaryMan wrote:
I hear women that use shirtless pics have a 100% success rating
My success rate increased like 300%
From like 1-2 replies per couple of weeks to....
old days: http://i.imgur.com/Xz9Bq.png
Now??
Let me estimate...
At least 5 to 10 messages per day.
Now you should do a study on your success of getting laid by these women. That would be more compelling.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Yo Guys Is This Strange? |
07 May 2025, 9:13 am |
| Uhhh Hey Guys I'm New |
29 Apr 2025, 2:37 pm |
