Does anyone think the second model looks like she has something on her abdomen that isnt bones? That just doesnt even look like the normal formation of the thoracis cavity to me. I also want to point out that most women arent shaped like the first. Her female form is the ideal, but most women dont have thick thighs, big butt and a small waste. Jen is prettier though, because I like her shape the best. I am a thin girl and I'd like more hips. I have a chest and a butt, but my hips arent as wide as I like. I think calling the second girl ugly is uncalled for, but if it's freedom of speech so whatever.
Id like to point out that the guy who posted those pics of the good-looking thick women- what made them attractive is possibly that their weight was in their body and not on their necks and face. These women were big but still proportionate. in other words their weight is distributed in the body, and not also in the face, which may be "unattractive" to some if a woman has an accompanying big head (THink Mo'Nique). I havent seen a lot of proportionate big women. I mean really, all of those women have Mo'Nique's body, but the facial shape of someone a few pounds less. Is this common? I think people should keep in mind that all people gain weight in different areas. Not all women have the hourglass shape- that is a myth. Most women have thick legs, thicker waists (I dont mean chubby waists, and this is true especially after childbirth because the thoracic cavity widens a little for the baby) and hips that are less narrow than their shoulders.
Lots of women are naturally small and wont gain weight until after childbirth. This too may have had genetic/evolutionary advantages as well. Thinner women may not have taken as much from the food supply, and (in my genetic case) may have avoided diseases like diabetes or heart disease.
21 Mar 2008, 1:56 am
