06 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
06 Jan 2018, 2:11 pm
The best thing is when she sends you dick pics, but not many are cultured and sophisticated enough to understand the beauty of this.
fluffysaurus wrote:
Do you guys pay to be on these sites?Guys can pay for a lot of things.
06 Jan 2018, 4:52 pm
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Okcupid is going fully Tinder.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
I actually think it's a good change for men ultimately.
Not really; they did it for the women.
Now thoughtful intro messages have zero value, only the messages from the very handsome men will be noticed.
What boo said. If your ugly or just not really handsome or take good photos you never be seen now.
What I don’t get is how will their business model of getting men to pay continue or are they planning in making all their money from advertising towards women? Certainly this will drive most men away eventually and it’s mostly men who’ll pay them for their services. Most dating sites work this way it’s why there’s so many fake women profiles to attract men. They really should make fake meal profiles to attract women and evennip the gender ratio though. This seems like a stupid solution to dick pictures would only had to be banning accounts that send dick pictures
Do you guys pay to be on these sites?I don't see the benefit of just photos for women either with the exception of those women who are just on there to flirt or wind people up. It would be no help to one looking for a relationship.
I don’t but I also don’t get to see who liked me or be in the priority list for matching or what not. I’ve heard from women that they don’t have to pay to see who liked them.
Most dating sites are this way they make their money off men mostly. There’s more men on dating sites then women so makes sense to target men. It’s also in their best interest to never match anyone cause if guys get into relationships they won’t be on dating sites paying to find a gf
06 Jan 2018, 4:57 pm
06 Jan 2018, 5:14 pm
06 Jan 2018, 5:23 pm
sly279 wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Okcupid is going fully Tinder.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
I actually think it's a good change for men ultimately.
Not really; they did it for the women.
Now thoughtful intro messages have zero value, only the messages from the very handsome men will be noticed.
What boo said. If your ugly or just not really handsome or take good photos you never be seen now.
What I don’t get is how will their business model of getting men to pay continue or are they planning in making all their money from advertising towards women? Certainly this will drive most men away eventually and it’s mostly men who’ll pay them for their services. Most dating sites work this way it’s why there’s so many fake women profiles to attract men. They really should make fake meal profiles to attract women and evennip the gender ratio though. This seems like a stupid solution to dick pictures would only had to be banning accounts that send dick pictures
Do you guys pay to be on these sites?I don't see the benefit of just photos for women either with the exception of those women who are just on there to flirt or wind people up. It would be no help to one looking for a relationship.
I don’t but I also don’t get to see who liked me or be in the priority list for matching or what not. I’ve heard from women that they don’t have to pay to see who liked them.
Most dating sites are this way they make their money off men mostly. There’s more men on dating sites then women so makes sense to target men. It’s also in their best interest to never match anyone cause if guys get into relationships they won’t be on dating sites paying to find a gf
Yes that would be right. Happy people aren't such good customers.
06 Jan 2018, 5:26 pm
kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep. We have to be able to make those distinctions.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Unless he was in politics.
06 Jan 2018, 5:56 pm
fluffysaurus wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep. We have to be able to make those distinctions.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Unless he was in politics.
Huh?
06 Jan 2018, 5:58 pm
06 Jan 2018, 6:00 pm
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Okcupid is going fully Tinder.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
I actually think it's a good change for men ultimately.
Not really; they did it for the women.
Now thoughtful intro messages have zero value, only the messages from the very handsome men will be noticed.
What boo said. If your ugly or just not really handsome or take good photos you never be seen now.
What I don’t get is how will their business model of getting men to pay continue or are they planning in making all their money from advertising towards women? Certainly this will drive most men away eventually and it’s mostly men who’ll pay them for their services. Most dating sites work this way it’s why there’s so many fake women profiles to attract men. They really should make fake meal profiles to attract women and evennip the gender ratio though. This seems like a stupid solution to dick pictures would only had to be banning accounts that send dick pictures
Do you guys pay to be on these sites?I don't see the benefit of just photos for women either with the exception of those women who are just on there to flirt or wind people up. It would be no help to one looking for a relationship.
I don’t but I also don’t get to see who liked me or be in the priority list for matching or what not. I’ve heard from women that they don’t have to pay to see who liked them.
Most dating sites are this way they make their money off men mostly. There’s more men on dating sites then women so makes sense to target men. It’s also in their best interest to never match anyone cause if guys get into relationships they won’t be on dating sites paying to find a gf
Yes that would be right. Happy people aren't such good customers.
Likewise with medical care and therapy. It’s why we never have cure for cancer. Imagine if they could cure cancer. The companies would lose billions from cancer therapy.
End of the day they’re business and they want to keep making money. Some doctors and nurses want to help people, but the hospital is all about making money and lots of it.
06 Jan 2018, 6:02 pm
06 Jan 2018, 8:23 pm
07 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
sly279 wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
sly279 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Closet Genious wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Okcupid is going fully Tinder.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
Now your first messages are only visible to the women who like your picture.
https://theblog.okcupid.com/why-okcupid ... 4d492e7853
Check the comments, men and lesbian women are the unhappiest with this change.
I actually think it's a good change for men ultimately.
Not really; they did it for the women.
Now thoughtful intro messages have zero value, only the messages from the very handsome men will be noticed.
What boo said. If your ugly or just not really handsome or take good photos you never be seen now.
What I don’t get is how will their business model of getting men to pay continue or are they planning in making all their money from advertising towards women? Certainly this will drive most men away eventually and it’s mostly men who’ll pay them for their services. Most dating sites work this way it’s why there’s so many fake women profiles to attract men. They really should make fake meal profiles to attract women and evennip the gender ratio though. This seems like a stupid solution to dick pictures would only had to be banning accounts that send dick pictures
Do you guys pay to be on these sites?I don't see the benefit of just photos for women either with the exception of those women who are just on there to flirt or wind people up. It would be no help to one looking for a relationship.
I don’t but I also don’t get to see who liked me or be in the priority list for matching or what not. I’ve heard from women that they don’t have to pay to see who liked them.
Most dating sites are this way they make their money off men mostly. There’s more men on dating sites then women so makes sense to target men. It’s also in their best interest to never match anyone cause if guys get into relationships they won’t be on dating sites paying to find a gf
Yes that would be right. Happy people aren't such good customers.
Likewise with medical care and therapy. It’s why we never have cure for cancer. Imagine if they could cure cancer. The companies would lose billions from cancer therapy.
End of the day they’re business and they want to keep making money. Some doctors and nurses want to help people, but the hospital is all about making money and lots of it.
Our health care is free, it's run by the government and it spends billions of £ on cancer every year so it is definitely after cures.
It's very true in things like the food industry though, the same companies own the diet foods and the snack foods.
07 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
sly279 wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Yep. We have to be able to make those distinctions.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Also, in the real world, a man would probably never send a picture of his dick to a woman.
Unless he was in politics.
Huh?
There's a whole list of male politicians who have gotten into trouble for doing this, often to random women.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,399
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
07 Jan 2018, 4:15 am
07 Jan 2018, 4:39 am
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Dating Site |
10 May 2025, 7:51 pm |
| Hi, I just joined the site |
19 Apr 2025, 10:49 am |
| Site listing meds ingredients |
05 Apr 2025, 4:02 am |
| 4Chan Hacked, Admins Doxxed, Site SHUTDOWN |
21 Apr 2025, 7:16 am |
