low dependency relationships

Page 3 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

TallulahPip
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 10

16 Jun 2011, 9:57 am

MV, I hear ya. These are some of the issues we've discussed too. We both understand that there will be times when we may have social events or some sort of obligation that we will need to attend. We're willing to compromise. We know this can't be perfect. And that's life. And it all still remains to be seen how successful we will be...



TallulahPip
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 10

16 Jun 2011, 10:04 am

I should also add that we have never required each other to attend ANY social events. We've always had the right to back out, no questions asked. So that helps a bit.



Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

16 Jun 2011, 10:29 am

mv wrote:
This kind of relationship sounds ideal for my needs (43, female, two children under 8 years old), but I wonder how one could pull it off, practically. For example, what if I'm in one of my "need space" phases and he's in a "need companionship" phase? Or vice versa? Or if I'd like him to accompany me to some occasional social activity (a party, a play, whatever) and he's not into it? How do you take the good without fostering resentment during the non-meshy times?

I'm extraordinarily independent, which is why I think I need to govern what happens when I do surrender some of that independence (in the form of companionship-on-demand). Does that make sense? I think this is why I'm alone. Too autonomous.


Me too, almost word-for-word.

In regards to being "out-of-phase", my answer is that this inevitable occurance is not a big deal to non-dependent people to begin with: sh*t happens...

Those kind of things are more a problem for whiny hyper-dependent drama queens (AKA NTs) :wink: