Is not having friends a turn off?

Page 3 of 12 [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

03 Apr 2012, 11:36 pm

Quote:
Studies on general internet users seem to support this position. Although initial work suggested that time spent online was correlated with a small but signicant increase in loneliness and depression (Kraut et al., 1 998), subsequent replications and extensions found the reverse (Howard et al., 2001 ; Moody, 2001 ; Wastlund et al., 2001 ) and a follow-up to the original Kraut et al. study found the negative effects were no longer present and that, in contrast, internet use was generally associated with positive effects on communication, social involvement, and well-being (Kraut et al., 2002). A key finding from this latter study was that extroverts generally showed a positive relationship between internet use and social well-being measures, whereas introverts showed the reverse - reporting an increase in isolation and loneliness. It is still not clear why this might be the case, although it has been suggested that the internet might provide tools to ``amplify'' predispositions (Joinson, 2003), so that extraverts can meet more people and socialize, while introverts can keep them at a distance.

http://mindfull.spc.org/vaughan/Bell_2007_JMH.pdf

this is all i can find about introverts and socialising so far. still looking...


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

03 Apr 2012, 11:39 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Quote:
Studies on general internet users seem to support this position. Although initial work suggested that time spent online was correlated with a small but signicant increase in loneliness and depression (Kraut et al., 1 998), subsequent replications and extensions found the reverse (Howard et al., 2001 ; Moody, 2001 ; Wastlund et al., 2001 ) and a follow-up to the original Kraut et al. study found the negative effects were no longer present and that, in contrast, internet use was generally associated with positive effects on communication, social involvement, and well-being (Kraut et al., 2002). A key finding from this latter study was that extroverts generally showed a positive relationship between internet use and social well-being measures, whereas introverts showed the reverse - reporting an increase in isolation and loneliness. It is still not clear why this might be the case, although it has been suggested that the internet might provide tools to ``amplify'' predispositions (Joinson, 2003), so that extraverts can meet more people and socialize, while introverts can keep them at a distance.

http://mindfull.spc.org/vaughan/Bell_2007_JMH.pdf

this is all i can find about introverts and socialising so far. still looking...


That's extremely interesting!

Thank you for sharing.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


Zinnel
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 405
Location: Missouri, USA

03 Apr 2012, 11:39 pm

Yeah I understand what your saying and they might have a need to make that disclaimer, If had they bothered to find out if the people who participated in the experiement were ether introverted or extraverted.

Its kind of like when people do surveys of political hot topics, they pick a random sample and ask them their opinion on a new bill. They get 40% against the bill and 34% approve of the bill while 6% stay undecided. Seems like a legit survey and they end it there saying "that majority disapprove of the bill", without looking into the fact that the 40% in their random sample are all apart of the political party that is against the other political party that is pushing the bill. The political parties of their random sample were not accounted for.

So its possible that in an experiement involving "friendships and healthiness" that whether or not the participants were introverted or extraverted was not accounted for. A variable which could have shown a possible correlation from the experiements results.


_________________
keep an open mind but not so open your brain falls out


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

03 Apr 2012, 11:41 pm

you're welcome. found another... here the researchers measured resistance to the common cold, and found that having a diversity of social relationships (i.e. family, romance, friends) was most important in conferring immunity.

Quote:
This study demonstrated that social isolation constitutes a major risk factor for the development of illness. Volunteers who were relatively socially isolated (1-3 relationships) were 4.2 times more likely to develop illness than those with very diverse networks (6 or more relationships). Although relative isolation (1-3 relationships) accounted for most of the effect, the association was graded with persons with moderate numbers of social roles (4-5) receiving some benefit. Interestingly, it was the diversity of participants’ social networks, rather than the total number of relationships they had, that predicted susceptibility. This suggests that it is something about occupying a variety of social roles (e.g., spouse, parent, co-worker, and friend) that promotes resistance to infection. How this occurs is not clear, although the present study suggests that it is not likely to be through a stress-buffering mechanism. First, the association of social network diversity and illness susceptibility was independent of the increased risk for colds found among those experiencing chronic stressful events. Second, we found no evidence for an interaction between social participation and chronic stress in predicting cold susceptibility. That is, the presence of an enduring stressor increased illness risk for volunteers across the spectrum of social network diversity.

http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/article ... cohen.html


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Zinnel
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 405
Location: Missouri, USA

03 Apr 2012, 11:46 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Quote:
Studies on general internet users seem to support this position. Although initial work suggested that time spent online was correlated with a small but signicant increase in loneliness and depression (Kraut et al., 1 998), subsequent replications and extensions found the reverse (Howard et al., 2001 ; Moody, 2001 ; Wastlund et al., 2001 ) and a follow-up to the original Kraut et al. study found the negative effects were no longer present and that, in contrast, internet use was generally associated with positive effects on communication, social involvement, and well-being (Kraut et al., 2002). A key finding from this latter study was that extroverts generally showed a positive relationship between internet use and social well-being measures, whereas introverts showed the reverse - reporting an increase in isolation and loneliness. It is still not clear why this might be the case, although it has been suggested that the internet might provide tools to ``amplify'' predispositions (Joinson, 2003), so that extraverts can meet more people and socialize, while introverts can keep them at a distance.

http://mindfull.spc.org/vaughan/Bell_2007_JMH.pdf

this is all i can find about introverts and socialising so far. still looking...


:lol: so basicly this says that if you are introverted you need to stay away from the internet unless you like being alone.....nice, that would explain alot of my friends though

thanks for sharing


_________________
keep an open mind but not so open your brain falls out


Luska
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 165

04 Apr 2012, 5:43 am

I cannot believe how fast this thread went in just a few minutes after I started it. :D Only 2 minutes after I posted it and it got a lot of posts. Thanks.

I find it interesting that even the people here of all people find someone who who does not have friends a turn off (most of you at least). I never expected that.



ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

04 Apr 2012, 9:32 am

Luska wrote:
I cannot believe how fast this thread went in just a few minutes after I started it. :D Only 2 minutes after I posted it and it got a lot of posts. Thanks.

I find it interesting that even the people here of all people find someone who who does not have friends a turn off (most of you at least). I never expected that.


Yeah... :?


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

04 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm

My answer to the original question is that I don't care if people have friends or not. I do, however, find it to be a turn-off if a person has a lot of friends. People who have that much need for social interaction are foreign and a little creepy to me. Of course, I would still give her a chance.

hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

Quote:
i was wrong - it was unhealthy and unbalanced. he became my whole world and i lost perspective, pretty much. and it was a huge pressure and responsibility on him to be (essentially) my only social contact.


My situation was just the opposite; I had no friends when I was with my girlfriend, and she was upset that she was not getting enough attention from me, even though we lived together. It's a question of different personalities. A more emotionally needy person may cling to the significant other when they have no friends; a less needy person may be able to maintain an appropriate separation because they truly don't need any friends.



hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled

04 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm

starkid wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

I find this to be true for me, too. I have had a series of friendships over the years, but lost most of them because the said friend would become very demanding of my time, or I would overwhelm them. My current romantic relationship is very different from casual friendships, and I take it a heck of a lot more seriously. Whereas I could blow off a casual friend, I would not do this to my SO, nor he to me. I think the dynamics of a romantic relationship are very different than those of a casual friendship!


_________________
Dreams are renewable. No matter what our age or condition, there are still untapped possibilities within us and new beauty waiting to be born.
-- Dr. Dale Turner


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

04 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm

starkid wrote:
My answer to the original question is that I don't care if people have friends or not. I do, however, find it to be a turn-off if a person has a lot of friends. People who have that much need for social interaction are foreign and a little creepy to me. Of course, I would still give her a chance.

hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

Quote:
i was wrong - it was unhealthy and unbalanced. he became my whole world and i lost perspective, pretty much. and it was a huge pressure and responsibility on him to be (essentially) my only social contact.


My situation was just the opposite; I had no friends when I was with my girlfriend, and she was upset that she was not getting enough attention from me, even though we lived together. It's a question of different personalities. A more emotionally needy person may cling to the significant other when they have no friends; a less needy person may be able to maintain an appropriate separation because they truly don't need any friends.

in terms of how much a person can benefit from friendship, apparently everyone needs friends equally. the only difference is that some people think that they don't.

lack of interest in friendship doesn't equal not NEEDING friends for emotional or physical health.

hartzofspace wrote:
starkid wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

I find this to be true for me, too. I have had a series of friendships over the years, but lost most of them because the said friend would become very demanding of my time, or I would overwhelm them. My current romantic relationship is very different from casual friendships, and I take it a heck of a lot more seriously. Whereas I could blow off a casual friend, I would not do this to my SO, nor he to me. I think the dynamics of a romantic relationship are very different than those of a casual friendship!

friendship is part of a romantic relationship. if a person struggles with friendship, they are bringing that deficit into the romantic relationship. it is only part of the romantic relationship, but it is a large part.

i would challenge people to provide examples of any person who lived a long and healthy married life with only a spouse and not a single friend.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


CrazyStarlightRedux
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,028
Location: Manchester, UK.

04 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm

Yuzu wrote:
I agree. I've lived at my current location for 13 years and I don't have anybody I can call a friend here but I have a few very close friends who live far away.

But I have to admit if one doesn't have absolutely no friends whatssoever I don't think I would consider dating.


I don't think anyone can say that they have "no" friends, but they can say they have lost friends via lack of contact/effort on both sides.

I myself don't go out of my way to talk to my friends because I am stuck in a cycle of fear of going outside and not being dependant enough, I have a few friends like this too (they don't have Aspergers) which makes this even harder to maintain. I have tried my best to stop this though.

I think people in relationships START to make more effort to see their old friends because they want to show their new bf/gf to impress but the outcome of someone dating you should never be based on having no friends (as people DO have friends, they just never see them and the lack of effort means they won't bother).

Regarding people being online as introverts, that is somewhat true, but everyone these days live and die by facebook to not actually care about visiting their friends IRL anyway...so we are all becoming that little more introverted in our lives (Facebook, being poor and dangerous hazards at night have messed up society).


_________________
Just a guy who gives advice and talks a lot.


hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled

04 Apr 2012, 1:39 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
starkid wrote:
My answer to the original question is that I don't care if people have friends or not. I do, however, find it to be a turn-off if a person has a lot of friends. People who have that much need for social interaction are foreign and a little creepy to me. Of course, I would still give her a chance.

hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

Quote:
i was wrong - it was unhealthy and unbalanced. he became my whole world and i lost perspective, pretty much. and it was a huge pressure and responsibility on him to be (essentially) my only social contact.


My situation was just the opposite; I had no friends when I was with my girlfriend, and she was upset that she was not getting enough attention from me, even though we lived together. It's a question of different personalities. A more emotionally needy person may cling to the significant other when they have no friends; a less needy person may be able to maintain an appropriate separation because they truly don't need any friends.

in terms of how much a person can benefit from friendship, apparently everyone needs friends equally. the only difference is that some people think that they don't.

lack of interest in friendship doesn't equal not NEEDING friends for emotional or physical health.

hartzofspace wrote:
starkid wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
if they can't maintain one friendship then i would suspect that they may have problems sustaining a romantic relationship.


Like other people have said, it is not necessarily a case of not being able to maintain a friendship, but instead may be a case of just not being interested. Romantic relationships are significantly different than friendships for some people, and you can't judge one by the other.

I find this to be true for me, too. I have had a series of friendships over the years, but lost most of them because the said friend would become very demanding of my time, or I would overwhelm them. My current romantic relationship is very different from casual friendships, and I take it a heck of a lot more seriously. Whereas I could blow off a casual friend, I would not do this to my SO, nor he to me. I think the dynamics of a romantic relationship are very different than those of a casual friendship!

friendship is part of a romantic relationship. if a person struggles with friendship, they are bringing that deficit into the romantic relationship. it is only part of the romantic relationship, but it is a large part.

i would challenge people to provide examples of any person who lived a long and healthy married life with only a spouse and not a single friend.

I agree that friendship is part of a romantic relationship. I forgot to mention that my SO is my best friend as well. I long for other friends, but just don't have the knack of keeping friends. I would also be very curious to know of any couple who only has a spouse for a friend. That is the case with me right now, due to health issues. But I always hope that it will change for the better! :)


_________________
Dreams are renewable. No matter what our age or condition, there are still untapped possibilities within us and new beauty waiting to be born.
-- Dr. Dale Turner


starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

04 Apr 2012, 1:54 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
in terms of how much a person can benefit from friendship, apparently everyone needs friends equally. the only difference is that some people think that they don't.


Of course not everyone needs friendship equally; everyone is different. How can you say otherwise, how can you speak for everyone? Do you have some sort of proof?

Quote:
friendship is part of a romantic relationship. if a person struggles with friendship,

Well, like I said before, it is not necessarily a struggle. Just because a person has no friends doesn't mean something is wrong with them, that they tried to have friends and couldn't make it work.

Quote:
they are bringing that deficit into the romantic relationship. it is only part of the romantic relationship, but it is a large part.


And the friendship in the context of the relationship may be enough, both in terms of what is needed and what is wanted. Maybe instead of seeing them as someone with no friends, it would make more sense to see them as someone who does not yet have the one friend they would like to have. But if you begin with the assumption that something MUST be wrong with such a person, and refuse to rethink it, we cannot agree.

Quote:
i would challenge people to provide examples of any person who lived a long and healthy married life with only a spouse and not a single friend.


Well, like you said, the spouse is a friend, so such a person does have at least one friend. But just because we don't personally know anyone we can use as an example doesn't prove or disprove anything. People living a life like that are in the minority (because not many people choose to), so it's going to be hard to find examples. Plus, we're on a forum full of people who have social issues; collectively, we don't know a whole lot of people to use as examples for anything :)

Also, marriage is nothing but a legal contract. Not everyone can get married, certainly no one needs to in order to have a successful relationship, and some are pressured into it by family/culture. It's not a good indicator of anything having to do with the quality of relationships.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

04 Apr 2012, 2:10 pm

starkid wrote:
Of course not everyone needs friendship equally; everyone is different. How can you say otherwise, how can you speak for everyone? Do you have some sort of proof?

i posted some and read a bunch more. people aren't exempt from needing friendship just because they don't want friends. :shrug:


Quote:
Well, like I said before, it is not necessarily a struggle. Just because a person has no friends doesn't mean something is wrong with them, that they tried to have friends and couldn't make it work.

that does sound like they have something wrong with their ability to make or keep friends, which is related to their ability to make and keep other relationships functional.

Quote:
And the friendship in the context of the relationship may be enough, both in terms of what is needed and what is wanted. Maybe instead of seeing them as someone with no friends, it would make more sense to see them as someone who does not yet have the one friend they would like to have. But if you begin with the assumption that something MUST be wrong with such a person, and refuse to rethink it, we cannot agree.

yeah, i consider that to be unbalanced and unhealthy (and researchers agree). i challenge you to find one single piece of research that says that a person does NOT need any friends other than a spouse.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled

04 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
starkid wrote:

Quote:
Well, like I said before, it is not necessarily a struggle. Just because a person has no friends doesn't mean something is wrong with them, that they tried to have friends and couldn't make it work.

I like this quote. That is how I see myself, actually.
starkid wrote:
And the friendship in the context of the relationship may be enough, both in terms of what is needed and what is wanted. Maybe instead of seeing them as someone with no friends, it would make more sense to see them as someone who does not yet have the one friend they would like to have. But if you begin with the assumption that something MUST be wrong with such a person, and refuse to rethink it, we cannot agree.

I like this too. I still hope for that friend outside the relationship I am currently in.
hyperlexian wrote:
yeah, i consider that to be unbalanced and unhealthy (and researchers agree). i challenge you to find one single piece of research that says that a person does NOT need any friends other than a spouse.

Actually I find that I do very well with just my spouse for a friend. It doesn't mean that I don't "need" other friends. I would very much like to have other friends. I just don't. That is something I have had to learn to accept.


_________________
Dreams are renewable. No matter what our age or condition, there are still untapped possibilities within us and new beauty waiting to be born.
-- Dr. Dale Turner


blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

05 Apr 2012, 3:28 pm

Luska wrote:
Is not having friends a turn off? From the point of view of a potential boyfriend/girlfriend is not having a friend a turn off?

Probably is a turn-off for most people, but there are others who wouldn't mind or care I suppose.

I believe this question paralels with "Is being aspie or autistic a turn off?" And I pressume the usual answers given to one question would apply to the other as well.

I particularly, don't care wether I am a turn off for not having friends or that a "potential girlfriend" does not have friends, given that I'm not interested in relationships, if I would, I probably would be worried. So I pitty you :P


For instance, at work there is a woman who has mood swings and other issues, due to a past abuse experience with her ex-husband. And yeah, that is defenitely a turn-off!