Teebie wrote:
He is currently working away and we have just had a telephone conversation in which I was discussing an event I am attending later today. It is an outdoor event with critical timings relating to catching a boat/parking etc and I was fretting as to the best way of going about it and as I knew this was the sort of thing he would be worrying about if he were attending with me it seemed a good opportunity for discussion/identifying common ground. His suggestion was that I should go as early as possible as it ws better to be there early with my kindle to read than risk arriving late. Given that the weather is a bit suspect I commented that i didn't really want to risk the kindle if it was going to rain.
His reaction was that I had ignored all his good advice and picked at a detail (the kindle) and dismissed it! I suppose I should not have taken the 'good advice' as read, should have given him credit and not allowed myself to 'think out loud' about the Kindle?!
I see it. This is the kind of comment I find annoying too. Of course, one comment is not important, but a close relationship where this stuff happens regularly can be too much.
Where's the problem? Well, what you said, if you put it as a logical sentence, is
exactly:
If it rains => The kindle can be damaged
This is quite obvious, so basically, you're telling him '
stupid'.
Of course, what you meant to say was '
the weather forecast said that it could rain', something that he (if he's away) doesn't know. But instead of saying that, what you said was '
i didn't really want to risk the kindle if it was going to rain'. So he probably felt despised, as you were implying that he didn't know that rain could damage an eReader.
Yeap, it's a bit choosy. In spite of people say here, being precise is not that easy
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)