nick007 wrote:
I'm not an atheist persay, I'm more agnostic & consider myself a Secular Humanist. I come from a conservative relgious area where lots are hypocritical & judgmental with the do as I say & not as I do attitude. When wanting a relationship I never limited myself to atheist or agnostic women but I wanted a women to respect my beliefs or rather non beliefs as I would respect her's. I didn't like having things pushed on me & wanted to be accepted without that so it's only rite that I'm respectful of religious if they are respectful of me not being religious. My girlfriend considers herself a Pantheist. I'm not really sure what that is but she sort of worships in her own way. She does go to church sometimes when she's staying at her parents but doesn't consider herself part of that religion. She would like to go to church more but would have to find one around here that sounds appealing to her. I'm sportive of her going if she would find out about one she'd like to try & I'd go with her if she wanted me to so she wouldn't be going by herself or anything even if I wouldn't believe it because I believe in supporting my partner.
I was brought up as a Humanist. The origins of Humanism began during the Industrial Revolution in the U.K.. The forced expulsion of tenant farmers who had worked the same land for 100's of years so that sheep be installed ( for the wool textile industry), + the homelessness that this created, and the terrible working conditions, esp. for children forced many of the 1st industrialists to re-think what they had accomplished by turning society upside down.
The 1st Humane Societies in the U.K. advocated for Children as well as animals, since children ( & women) were considered under the law as 'animals' & property. They wanted children to have at least a rudimentary education, & for all workers to have a common day of rest, decent & safe working conditions, & a limit on the hours that they could be forced to work.
None of the major churches would assist or advocate for workers. None of them spoke up for the children working in mines & factories for sometimes 16 hours a day, 7 days a week. The Humanists stood up for basic human rights, but organized religion felt that 'it was not their job' to put an opinion on 'Worldly things'. This caused a split between Churches & social activists like The Humanists.
It is not necessary to be Atheist, Agnostic, or Anti-Theist to be a Humanist. You can be as religious as you like, or not religious at all, but the idea seems to be that organized religion will often not comment on social evils, so you shouldn't rely on them to assist in progress toward a more 'Humane' society.
(& Churches often rely on the contributions of the rich to maintain themselves.)
I'm personally inclined to believe in the sacredness of all things in Nature, & respecting them & the environment of our planet. I'm not a believer in God as a personality. I don't believe that any one faith has all or even most of the answers. I don't even believe that some of them have asked the right questions.
I do believe in respecting others, the Earth, & yourself.
I have one commandment: " Behave Yourself!"