08 Jan 2014, 8:55 am
There are shallow people of both sexes. Luckily, there are some who do *not* fit the shallow stereotype.
Here's hoping we all learn to distinguish between the shallow and non-shallow in 2014 (and perhaps all become a bit more non-shallow ourselves), and find that perfect someone. 
08 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
Eureka13 wrote:
Here's hoping we all learn to distinguish between the shallow and non-shallow in 2014 (and perhaps all become a bit more non-shallow ourselves), and find that perfect someone.
2014 shall be the year of the giant tube worm, for it is among the deepest of all animals.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,677
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
08 Jan 2014, 10:10 am
FMX wrote:
Kjas wrote:
That's true for men. Not for women.
This is a case where men tend to prefer quantity, and therefore due to ToM issues and forgetting basic biological and physical differences, cannot understand why women prefer quality.
This is a case where men tend to prefer quantity, and therefore due to ToM issues and forgetting basic biological and physical differences, cannot understand why women prefer quality.
You may be surprised to learn it was a woman who said it.
But I certainly don't blame you for assuming otherwise.Yeah, as if sluts don't exist (I apply the word slut on both genders).
Kjas, there are a whole sexual communities about such quantity-based sex lifestyle (similar to bdsm and other s**t), google them. And there are plenty of women involved, and yes, they refer to their lifestyle as sluts proudly, they DO use this word to describe themselves (like bdsm people refer to themselves as master/slave or some other s**t).
I even once skyped an indian girl who turned out to constantly desire to be raped, by a lot of men, I thought at first she meant it as dominance/submissive thing or roleplaying but she made it clear that she goes to dangerous places in India at night like buses to get raped every time. Yes, jaw-dropping shocking, I know - she either has developed a very wrong idea of sexual pleasure from youth or post-trauma messed up or just simply messed up in the head.
08 Jan 2014, 10:30 am
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,677
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
08 Jan 2014, 10:36 am
08 Jan 2014, 8:16 pm
FMX wrote:
Kjas wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
And because bad sex with a selfish partner doesn't fix loneliness. Really.
It just makes it worse. No sex is better than sh*t sex, especially as a woman. Unlike men we don't have the almost guarantee of finishing each time.
It seems intuitive to me that "sh** (anything non-essential)" is generally worse than lack of it. However, I've heard it said that sex is like pizza: even if it's bad it's still pretty good. If this was true (or widely believed to be true) that could explain a lot.
No, if it's moderately bad you may as well be rubbing your arm.
If it's really bad it hurts.
08 Jan 2014, 8:25 pm
Who_Am_I wrote:
FMX wrote:
Kjas wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
And because bad sex with a selfish partner doesn't fix loneliness. Really.
It just makes it worse. No sex is better than sh*t sex, especially as a woman. Unlike men we don't have the almost guarantee of finishing each time.
It seems intuitive to me that "sh** (anything non-essential)" is generally worse than lack of it. However, I've heard it said that sex is like pizza: even if it's bad it's still pretty good. If this was true (or widely believed to be true) that could explain a lot.
No, if it's moderately bad you may as well be rubbing your arm.
If it's really bad it hurts.
Or will nauseate you.
