You're too smart & other jibes about being single
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,451
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The mental disease part sounds hypocrite. lol
Good for you tarantella, I am getting out of here before something blows up.
Okay, which of these is/are acceptable?
I am gay. I only date gay people of my sex; I find that otherwise it's a bad experience for both of us.
I am [religion], and it's important to me that my future partner will be part of my religious community. I don't date outside that group because we don't share enough values and ways of life in common.
Sports is my life. Whoever is with me will have to accept that during [season], I'm gone every weekend. This will not change if we have kids, so if she wants a family man, she should pick someone else.
I am full-on monogamous and don't want to be involved with someone who wants a poly life.
I'm not willing to date someone with a significant mental illness; I am crazy enough on my own, thank you.
I'm extremely sociable and enjoy throwing parties for 500, also I'm running for office. Whoever I'm involved with will have to be cool with being around
tons of people almost all the time, otherwise we'd hardly see each other and I don't want that.
I've had a long career on the theatre, first on the road, then on Broadway, and now on the road again. Whoever I'm with needs to be able to handle a life in theatre and either come with me or handle long absences. I don't date single fathers for this reason. I've had a few insist and it turns out badly.
I am an extremely successful CEO. Whoever dates me has to be similarly successful (or more) and have his own money. My experience is that men who are less conventionally successful or less wealthy start out enthusiastic, but quickly become jealous and competitive, even mean, and accuse me of being a ballbusting b***h who never takes time for them, even though I'm the same woman they thought was great the year before, and no busier than I was then. I believe ambitious men really prefer to be with women who are less rich and less visibly successful than they are. (I'm not interested in dating unambitious men, we have little in common.)
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,451
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them has the right and freedom to give a try with me.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 27 Mar 2014, 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
I don't know. If you are gifted, it is hard to find people who are on your level. I've tried dating women who are not studious or well-red and it is boring for both of us. It's much more fun to be with somebody who shares your interests.
So is the point of this discussion that you should never say that you are really intelligent because it is considered bragging?

I find everyone interesting to talk to, and as long as they're willing to engage and communicate, there's no end to what I can learn, so I never really get bored talking to anyone.
I'm not even sure if I know what "bored" really means. I used the term as a child, "mummy I'm BORED!!" but looking back, I think I was just over-stimulated and lacking an outlet for my energies, having not yet twigged on to how amazing an interesting the world is.
I have just met you but I feel confident in saying that this stuff in bold, sir, is a bear faced lie. I bet that you wouldn't have to think very hard before coming up with at least one person who you'd run to hide from in a heartbeat.

People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them is free to give a try with me.
Sweetie, allowing someone a 'try with you' when you have already decided that they don't meet your criteria for acceptable girlfriend material IS belitling them. I don't understand why you don't see this though?
Last edited by leafplant on 27 Mar 2014, 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them has the right and freedom to give a try with me.
Is it possible your entire orientation here is so competitive that you read everything through that filter, even when it's inappropriate?
I know my limits with skis: namely, I should not put them on my feet. Me and Mr. Olympic Skier - no chance, unlikely we'd even be in the same bar. Does that mean I suck? No. It means I'm a total klutz who doesn't want a torn ACL. Good luck to him with being beautiful on the trails with a good match.
I don't know how old you are, but I'm not interested in guys "giving a try" with me when it's obviously a bad match. It wastes both our time and energy. By midlife, it seems most guys value these things and are also aware that hey, the lady's time and energy might be worth something, too. So they recognize it's not going to work, say something nice about the profile, and wish me luck. It's nice. I don't have to deal so often anymore with guys trying to prove something.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,451
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them is free to give a try with me.
Sweetie, allowing someone a 'try with you' when you have already decided that they don't meet your crieria for acceptable girlfriend material IS belitling them. I don't understand why you don't see this though?
Why would it be belittling them? I am not leading them on to ask me out but they're free to try if that what they want to try.
I would not accept them as partners if their life is just about shopping and gossip but I wouldn't have the "How dare you ask ME out??!" attitude; plus some of these shopping girls are friends with me (yet not everything about them is just shopping) and they are better than me in other aspects.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 27 Mar 2014, 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

I find everyone interesting to talk to, and as long as they're willing to engage and communicate, there's no end to what I can learn, so I never really get bored talking to anyone.
I'm not even sure if I know what "bored" really means. I used the term as a child, "mummy I'm BORED!!" but looking back, I think I was just over-stimulated and lacking an outlet for my energies, having not yet twigged on to how amazing an interesting the world is.
I have just met you but I feel confident in saying that this stuff in bold, sir, is a bear faced lie. I bet that you wouldn't have to think very hard before coming up with at least one person who you'd run to hide from in a heartbeat.

A bare faced lie? A tad harsh, but that's OK! I suppose I should add the extra qualifier " And they're a basically nice person", which would obviously discount some people, but other than that, it's the truth..at least as far back as I can remember.
Think about it.. even if someone is so far "down-the-scale" as it were that on the face of it they had nothing at all of interest to say.... isn't that in itself, interesting? I'd be wondering about the neurology of it all, trying to understand their view on the world. In some ways it's like opening the bonnet of a car. You can see the engine, the workings, and all the other aspects of consciousness and the human condition, and realise that classic "intelligence" is just one layer of a far deeper and more complex system that is the human mind.
Or maybe it's just me.

_________________
AQ:37 FQ:105 ENTP
Your Aspie score: 141 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 78 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
Nobody likes a know-it-all. If someone is constantly trying to show their knowledge and refuses to acknowledge other views I wouldn't want to spend much time with them.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them is free to give a try with me.
Sweetie, allowing someone a 'try with you' when you have already decided that they don't meet your crieria for acceptable girlfriend material IS belitling them. I don't understand why you don't see this though?
Why would it be belittling them? I am not leading them on to ask me out but they're free to try if that what they want to try.
I would not accept them as partners if their life is just about shopping and gossip but I wouldn't have the "How dare you ask ME out??!" attitude; plus some of these shopping girls are friends with me (yet not everything about them is just shopping) and they are better than me in other aspects.
This is getting very confusing, but I guess that's the whole reason why we all hang out here..
Anyhow..so when someone says 'I would let them try it on with me' in my experience it means the person is effectively setting up an ambush for the other person. Like, ha! now you will pay for not paying attention properly and approaching me when you should have known better - or something along those lines.
Now, what tarantella was saying is that she prefers to be upfront with people so that they wouldn't waste their own (as well as her) time by approaching her if it's already clear they are not compatible, whereas what I understood you were saying is that you don't mind wasting their time or yours by having the ladies try and strike up conversation with you (lets face it, we are talking protracted getting to know you process before it is decided if there is compatibility).
Unless you mean you would allow them to message you at first but you would immediately inform them that you are not interested? In which case how is your process of elimination different to that of tarantella? I have read your profile remember, and it was really very rude in that respect, so I cannot understand why you are having a go at tarantella when you are basically saying more or less the same thing on your own profile.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,451
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them has the right and freedom to give a try with me.
Is it possible your entire orientation here is so competitive that you read everything through that filter, even when it's inappropriate?
I know my limits with skis: namely, I should not put them on my feet. Me and Mr. Olympic Skier - no chance, unlikely we'd even be in the same bar. Does that mean I suck? No. It means I'm a total klutz who doesn't want a torn ACL. Good luck to him with being beautiful on the trails with a good match.
I don't know how old you are, but I'm not interested in guys "giving a try" with me when it's obviously a bad match. It wastes both our time and energy. By midlife, it seems most guys value these things and are also aware that hey, the lady's time and energy might be worth something, too. So they recognize it's not going to work, say something nice about the profile, and wish me luck. It's nice. I don't have to deal so often anymore with guys trying to prove something.
Our chief accountant is extremely obsessed about snowboarding and surfing - he would check every morning the snow/wave level on a website and he completely rejoices if things are good for the upcoming weekend, and gets bad mood when things are not.
Yet his wife, an auditor, is not the sporty type at all nor she ever engages in these activities.
They are of two different religions too, He's Maronite Christian, she's Sunnite Muslim. None of them is atheist or totally non-religious.
They're completely understanding with each other in every way.
And they have been married for more than 4 years with a child.

I find everyone interesting to talk to, and as long as they're willing to engage and communicate, there's no end to what I can learn, so I never really get bored talking to anyone.
I'm not even sure if I know what "bored" really means. I used the term as a child, "mummy I'm BORED!!" but looking back, I think I was just over-stimulated and lacking an outlet for my energies, having not yet twigged on to how amazing an interesting the world is.
I have just met you but I feel confident in saying that this stuff in bold, sir, is a bear faced lie. I bet that you wouldn't have to think very hard before coming up with at least one person who you'd run to hide from in a heartbeat.

A bare faced lie? A tad harsh, but that's OK! I suppose I should add the extra qualifier " And they're a basically nice person", which would obviously discount some people, but other than that, it's the truth..at least as far back as I can remember.
Think about it.. even if someone is so far "down-the-scale" as it were that on the face of it they had nothing at all of interest to say.... isn't that in itself, interesting? I'd be wondering about the neurology of it all, trying to understand their view on the world. In some ways it's like opening the bonnet of a car. You can see the engine, the workings, and all the other aspects of consciousness and the human condition, and realise that classic "intelligence" is just one layer of a far deeper and more complex system that is the human mind.
Or maybe it's just me.

So, what is a nice person. :sigh:
It is probably not just you, but it is definitely not me. I find most people beyond tedious. It's like they all come off a factory line, there is hardly anything unique or what I haven't heard before a million times. Even this sentence and this very interaction with yourself I have lived through at least a dozen times, with different people.
If you open a bonnet of a car you find exactly what you expect to find for a given car unless you have opened a bonnet of a custom made job. But even then, there will be an engine and all the other bits you expect to find in a car, maybe slightly differently arranged, but it will be there.
Perhaps this doesn't bore you in the slightest, but some people are bored by it. Anyway, this is why we have customs and ideas of politeness etc. to prevent people who slinking off when bored mid conversation or interrupting the other person or otherwise behaving in autistic manner.

People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?

I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them has the right and freedom to give a try with me.
Is it possible your entire orientation here is so competitive that you read everything through that filter, even when it's inappropriate?
I know my limits with skis: namely, I should not put them on my feet. Me and Mr. Olympic Skier - no chance, unlikely we'd even be in the same bar. Does that mean I suck? No. It means I'm a total klutz who doesn't want a torn ACL. Good luck to him with being beautiful on the trails with a good match.
I don't know how old you are, but I'm not interested in guys "giving a try" with me when it's obviously a bad match. It wastes both our time and energy. By midlife, it seems most guys value these things and are also aware that hey, the lady's time and energy might be worth something, too. So they recognize it's not going to work, say something nice about the profile, and wish me luck. It's nice. I don't have to deal so often anymore with guys trying to prove something.
Our chief accountant is extremely obsessed about snowboarding and surfing - he would check every morning the snow/wave level on a website and he completely rejoices if things are good for the upcoming weekend, and gets bad mood when things are not.
Yet his wife, an auditor, is not the sporty type at all nor she ever engages in these activities.
They are of two different religions too, He's Maronite Christian, she's Sunnite Muslim. None of them is atheist or totally non-religious.
They're completely understanding with each other in every way.
And they have been married for more than 4 years with a child.
Good for them but for the love of everything that is holy please understand that one example does not mean everyone else is the same. Or should be the same.
Everyone has a right to define their own personal happiness however they see fit, k?
I think pete is right; people are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you'll get. I know when you've know people a long time, interactions are predictable, but things do change over time.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger

I think you're spot on about customs and politeness. etc. I hadn't thought of it that way.
As for me, I guess these things are just in my scope of "special interests". So it could well be just me.

_________________
AQ:37 FQ:105 ENTP
Your Aspie score: 141 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 78 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
If I'm unhappy single why don't I prioritise it ? |
29 Apr 2025, 10:20 am |
Been single for too long and worried about a relationship |
27 Jun 2025, 1:16 pm |
Hard time getting hired as preacher because I am single |
16 Jul 2025, 7:58 am |