any women here who have never dated, never had a boyfriend?

Page 3 of 26 [ 416 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 26  Next

anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

22 Aug 2016, 3:32 am

^ well that goes a little further than what i was talking about, but... yes :)

viewtopic.php?t=324318&p=7227555#p7227555
viewtopic.php?t=324318&p=7227555#p7253218


_________________
404


wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

22 Aug 2016, 3:41 am

Huh, for some reason I thought this was in Women's Discussion. Oh well, it's very very late here and I'm barely awake.


_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War

(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Aug 2016, 3:51 am

hurtloam wrote:
anagram wrote:
this is one of the things that confuse me the most about this site and a lot of the people who post here: statistics are statistics, probability is probability, and people are people, but even some people who should really know better don't seem to make that distinction, and it has to be restated again and again. and then people keep ignoring it anyway

these generalizations actually help you understand how society works in general, but, as true and valid as they may be, they don't help understand individual cases. especially when we're talking about people outside of the bell curve (aka everybody on this website). or, simply put: it explains other people, not anybody here


Yes!

So often the case responses on threads are, but I read that "a study says"... "it's science you ignoramus!"

I've posted this before, but here it is again. Shark attacks go up when ice cream sales go up.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7592579.stm


Also, this John Oliver thing on scientific studies is good.


You can't just cherry pick the studies that suit your own hypothesis.


Image



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Aug 2016, 3:59 am

That kinda reminds me....



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

22 Aug 2016, 4:03 am

^ that show was great. i used to watch it when i was little, it actually made me think about a lot of things

and of course, it was funny :)



memory lane


_________________
404


anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am

sorry op, i can't resist :)



i was educated by tv


_________________
404


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Aug 2016, 4:35 am

Back to the topic, there's only 3 adult female users whom I am aware that they never had a bf or any form of relationship before: Chronos, hurtloam and slw.
Androbot also says she never had a serious relationship before too, but only a bad fwb.

I don't count the teens.

Are there any others? I don't frequent the Women forum (only when it's related to men or sometimes by mistake when I click on the listed last threads).



Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

22 Aug 2016, 4:50 am

WantToHaveALife wrote:
can anyone think of any women in their late 20's, 30's who has never had a boyfriend, never had a relationship before? i doubt it, but i can think of lots of guys like that


From an admittedly small circle, the only person I know who has never had a relationship or such is a woman in her mid thirties.

anagram wrote:
this is one of the things that confuse me the most about this site and a lot of the people who post here: statistics are statistics, probability is probability, and people are people, but even some people who should really know better don't seem to make that distinction, and it has to be restated again and again. and then people keep ignoring it anyway

these generalizations actually help you understand how society works in general, but, as true and valid as they may be, they don't help understand individual cases. especially when we're talking about people outside of the bell curve (aka everybody on this website). or, simply put: it explains other people, not anybody here


Quite. Statistics are not destiny, and nor are Darwinesque Just-So stories. There are particular problems and possible solutions, and fatalistic attitudes are only going to be self-fulfilling.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
And highly attractive men are way more likely to be promiscuous and playboys than attractive women and anyone else


Are they, though? Granted, again, it's hardly a statistically sound sample because of the circles I've moved through, but the only actually existing ladykillers I can think of have been average-looking-at-best proles. And the women weren't/aren't exactly slouches, either.

British proles: at it like rabbits. Sometimes the Daily Mail moral panics, though still BS, have a factual basis. As Jarvis sang:

You'll never live like common people
You'll never do what common people do
You'll never fail like common people
You'll never watch your life slide out of view,
And dance and drink and screw
Because there's nothing else to do


_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.


Amity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,714
Location: Meandering

22 Aug 2016, 6:29 am

I know one woman who fits the description.
She is a very shy private person so Ive never discussed this with her, but I think her general/social anxieties, the fear of rejection and breaking social conventions has kept her single.
I know she has had crushes, and maybe a date or two but for her I don't think it's ever gone beyond shyly showing interest.



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

22 Aug 2016, 7:18 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Back to the topic, there's only 3 adult female users whom I am aware that they never had a bf or any form of relationship before: Chronos, hurtloam and slw.
Androbot also says she never had a serious relationship before too, but only a bad fwb.

I don't count the teens.

Are there any others? I don't frequent the Women forum (only when it's related to men or sometimes by mistake when I click on the listed last threads).


At what age does one have to be before "oh, they're just young, it's natural to not have been on dates" becomes "what the hell is wrong with this idiot"? At what age does it become apparent that the person is only going to get worse, not better?



whatamievendoing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,336
Location: Finland

22 Aug 2016, 7:49 am

Sabreclaw wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Back to the topic, there's only 3 adult female users whom I am aware that they never had a bf or any form of relationship before: Chronos, hurtloam and slw.
Androbot also says she never had a serious relationship before too, but only a bad fwb.

I don't count the teens.

Are there any others? I don't frequent the Women forum (only when it's related to men or sometimes by mistake when I click on the listed last threads).


At what age does one have to be before "oh, they're just young, it's natural to not have been on dates" becomes "what the hell is wrong with this idiot"? At what age does it become apparent that the person is only going to get worse, not better?


I'd argue it's around the mid-teens, 16-17 years old. That's just my personal observation, though.

Unless you meant for that question to be rhetorical, in which case... Well, I obviously can't answer.


_________________
“They laugh at me because I'm different; I laugh at them because they're all the same.”
― Kurt Cobain


Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

22 Aug 2016, 8:51 am

Sabreclaw wrote:
At what age does one have to be before "oh, they're just young, it's natural to not have been on dates" becomes "what the hell is wrong with this idiot"? At what age does it become apparent that the person is only going to get worse, not better?


It can be quite late depending on whom you ask. For instance, my parents told me I was still too young to date at 22—I don't want to imagine how old they expected me to get before I could legitimately begin to worry, to the point of maybe, just maybe, doing something about it at all.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

22 Aug 2016, 9:37 am

Sabreclaw wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Back to the topic, there's only 3 adult female users whom I am aware that they never had a bf or any form of relationship before: Chronos, hurtloam and slw.
Androbot also says she never had a serious relationship before too, but only a bad fwb.

I don't count the teens.

Are there any others? I don't frequent the Women forum (only when it's related to men or sometimes by mistake when I click on the listed last threads).


At what age does one have to be before "oh, they're just young, it's natural to not have been on dates" becomes "what the hell is wrong with this idiot"? At what age does it become apparent that the person is only going to get worse, not better?


Sabreclaw wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Back to the topic, there's only 3 adult female users whom I am aware that they never had a bf or any form of relationship before: Chronos, hurtloam and slw.
Androbot also says she never had a serious relationship before too, but only a bad fwb.

I don't count the teens.

Are there any others? I don't frequent the Women forum (only when it's related to men or sometimes by mistake when I click on the listed last threads).


At what age does one have to be before "oh, they're just young, it's natural to not have been on dates" becomes "what the hell is wrong with this idiot"? At what age does it become apparent that the person is only going to get worse, not better?


Age 25.

Just my opinion, and in my anecdotal experiences plenty of young adults 18-25 have never had a relationship but may get one eventually, but it's also backed-up by statistical evidence, too.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf (page 17 and 18)

Each and every year starting at about 15/16, the virginity and 'never had sexual contact' rates decrease.

The decrease is initially not too bad from about 15-25, but after this point the virginity rate decreases significantly faster.

For instance, about 50% of males 15-17 were virgins, and ~24% at age 18-19. 20-24 = 14%

But 25-29? Male virgins are already only the 3.8%! !

These are U.S. statistics, but I've checked the Aussie version and the numbers aren't all that different here, either (http://sexcensus.swingersaustralia.com. ... -13-14.pdf).

35% lost their virginity at 16, compared to 0.8% at 25. The 'sharp decrease' happens at 18-20, so while 14% lost their virginity at 18, there's an entire 10% decrease by age 20 (I'll let you do the math).

Also, holy sh*t!

I knew Australia seems to have a high rate of Gay and Bisexual people, especially lesbian women or bisexuals that don't seem to like men anyway despite identifying as bi, who I keep having the misfortune of encountering (I've crushed on a few lesbians only to obviously be hurt I can't be with her, the fact the one lesbian who directly rejected me handled it poorly and the rest I've met have had aggressive and outright repulsive attitudes towards men even when they're treating her as neutrally and non-sexually as everyone else has only jaded and embittered me against them).

Only 75% of people in the Aussie statistics reported as Heterosexual!!



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Aug 2016, 10:07 am

20 and over.



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

22 Aug 2016, 11:39 am

Your statistics don't take individual cases into account though.

If your social life is literally dead by the end of your teens, with your social skills and ability to connect with people consistently going downhill for years, is it truly unreasonable to suspect that something might be just a little bit amiss, even if only in the very early 20's?

How many of those guys still virgins between 20-25 have social anxiety? Autism? Just plain ugly? How many are proper functioning people who simply haven't met the right person yet? Or have been focusing on other aspects of their lives?

The statistics don't really prove anything.



MsV
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 193

22 Aug 2016, 12:04 pm

Might be totally off base...
I've seen a lot of scientific research stating more women (girls) tend to fly under the 'neuro-atypical' radar, and go undiagnosed or are diagnosed at a later age than their male counterparts.
Not sure if this somehow correlates to the assertion that women have 'it easier' re. relationships.

Personal experience: relationships are great in the beginning, but too exhausting in the end. People tend to pretend they understand the need to unwind and be alone at times, but in general they just hope I'll 'turn normal' eventually, and expect me to act like a NT around them (despite me practically handing him a manual for my peculiarities - verbally, not in actual print form :lol: ).