Quote:
I can't really answer your question as I don't have the answers but if I had to guess it probably has something to do with biology ?
If that were the case then women would ALWAYS have been attracted to troglodytes, and yet it's a historical fact that, other than the present age, no age in the history of the western world has held up slovenliness as a desirable trait in men any more than in women.
Quote:
You should probably look into why some woman like a bit of rough or a bad boy.
Even if it were true, and no doubt it is and always has been, it only proves my point further - the hard, virile, street-wise type guy perfectly portrayed by, for example, Telly Savalas in the 1970s no longer exists - he certainly isn't found in an effeminate poser like Mr Hardy. The only conclusion is, like with everything else about modern society, that it is obsessed with the IMAGE of the value rather than the value itself - in this case, masculinity.
Quote:
On another note , back in the 70's women's pubic hair were a wild affair and it seemed the wilder the better , nowadays the highly manicured or shaved look seems desirable

, which one would you prefer for breakfast ? fashion and trends change with the wind , if you never change your style you will ultimately be out of style quite quickly but in a decade or two be the height of fashion again.
It's not immediately relevant, and I won't go into detail because it's vulgar, but I must say that I prefer more natural women in that respect. In fact, a large part of the reason I'm not particularly interested in sex is women's unnatural habits in that respect.
Secondarily, it's true that fashion is forever changing, but that that fact justifies its present manifestation is a fallacy. Fashions are always changing, but have buck teeth ever been fashionable? Of course not, because they're OBJECTIVELY unattractive, just as slovenliness is an objectively unattractive quality, though at the present rate, I expect that within a few years buck teeth probably will become fashionable; it certainly wouldn't be any less absurd than the fashions already mentioned. The gullible masses are that easily manipulated.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Fellas, don’t forget that our female ancestors have evolved for many thousands of years while mating with bearded men before the concept of shaving .... shaving is recent in comparison; so it’s not surpring to see differing opinions on that.
There must be a reason why, humans lost most of their “fur” yet the facial hair remains as a secondary sexual characteristic in male humans, why didn’t it vanish?
And check this out:
https://www.bustle.com/p/why-women-pref ... ce-3342932By that standard, they ought also to find loincloths and unwiped bottoms attractive. Again, I think there's a subtle fallacy your reasoning.