MidnightRose wrote:
If there was an option I would choose "I'm a man and maybe."
But leaning towards no. What if you marry and then find out on your honeymoon that you are completely sexually incompatible? You try and work on it, but you just don't work well together in that way. So what, you're both stuck in a sex-less marriage until you die or go through a divorce? Not to mention, I'm an agnostic leftist, and "wait 'till marriage" types generally (not always) also carry strong conservative and/or religious beliefs that would probably lead to some heated disagreements.
Sexual incompatibility was never important to me. I care about substantive things instead like mutual respect, commitment, trust, trying to the support each other when a problem arises, & such things. I'm an agnostic leftist as well & one piece of advice I've gotten very often was to look for women at church. I guess it made sense in a way cuz on top of not being into casual sex I was also straight-edge but the idea of faking something I'm not to meet somebody & get to know her a bit seemed like a recipe for disaster. I was willing to be with someone who was a religious right-winger but I would need her to respect that I am not as I would respect that she was. I'm originally from a very hardcore conservative area so ruling out those types woulda been another extremely limiting factor for me. I'm a walking contradiction to most stereotypes. On the surface I appear one way but there's something about me that goes against it. NTs claim that us Aspies have black & white thinking but NTs think that if I am not this then I must be that. It is either/or & no room for any middle ground or outsider perspective. I cant fit all nice & neat in any box. Probably why my own experiences contradict most of the dating & relationship advice I ever got.