Monogamy is a bad system to Humans

Post Reply New Topic

I wasn't talking to you, bro. I was talking to the original poster.

I agree with John.

Prince here does realize those ideas of polygamy are doomed at times in the case of Hitler because there is no such thing as a perfect race.

Also Hitler killed millions of people because of his beliefs of them were inferior to the His Race.

Monogamy is a bad system for those who only care about themselves.

^^ oh , but I am talking about 'superior' and 'inferior' race here , you people are MIXING A LOT OF UNRELATED THINGS TOGETHER!

The Nazi breeding system has nothing to do with my suggested Polygamous "Biological fathers and Social Fathers" System.
In fact , I support the inter-racial breeding because diversity of genes would help to decrease the genetic diseases in human population.
Genetic diseases show up more in populations where they allow consanguineous marriages , like Arabs and Jews and like .....the old Nazi Germans because those societies are so isolated and rarely allow marriages with other races :BAD THING.
Lack of diversity = disease comes, and can kill most of the population due to lack of different alleles.

So the best Polygamous system would be like this:
- Checking the adult males in order to know who's alpha and who's not.
-Alpha would become biological father of many children. They are the male breeders.
-Each Beta or Omega would be a social father of a 1 woman's children and be her social husband too.
-Each Alpha's spermas will be spread to ...let's say 10 women for example (the determination of the required number of women would need a deep statistical and demographic study, so 10 is just an example)
- The children of these 10 women would be half-brothers and so marriage between them is not allowed because this cause would cause a genetic bottleneck = lack of diversity.
-Racial diversity must be totally encouraged through this system .For example a white alpha's sperma should be distributed to 10 no-white women in the society. Diversity = the diseased genes go into equilibrium and then purged out of the population or put into very low levels as necessary.

The enforced inter-racial breeding is already used for animals in farms and it's a perfect way to improve the quality of offspring.

The main advantages of this system are three:

1-It will assure that only the good genes will be passed to the next generation. It will guarantee that Males with genetic diseases would not have children = their genes will be cast out of the genetic pool = FAST decrease of the inherited genetic disorders.
2-It will enforce inter-racial breeding, bye-bye to the consanguineous breeding. It will increase the diversity of genes and so the genetic disease will dramatically decrease
3- Socially , every child will have the protection of 2 parents: the biological mother and the social father.

Question. Do you support the idea of women with multiple husbands?

Btw, this is very wrong Chav. The Monogamy was not implanted in religions because it was created through Mother Nature. Monogamy was implanted in religions because of ...... men's jealousy and selfishness! Religions are created by men (MALES) and every male wanted to have sex with women , every male wanted to have children , every males thought that his genes deserve to survive .... but most males were afraid of women's power: the natural selection. Most males were afraid that they will be rejected by most women for the favor of few alpha males,most males were afraid of alpha male's power too . That's why males enforced the idea of women's possession : Marriage. The concept of marriage is a concept of POSSESSION = each male posses 1 or x number of wive , physically ,genetically and 'spiritually'= each male posses a 1 female's womb = suppression of women's main role in natural selection. In that way , every male would be happy.

So males worked to implant this concept in religion , in order to enforce it. That's why most religions see women as sinful creatures with sinful body.That's why most religion describe women's body as sinner ..as something diabolic .That's why the religious punishments for women's adultery are much more severe than men's adultery BECAUSE religions project the men's fear of women's natural power so they needed to suppress as much as they can.

In modern west society , women are restoring this role slowly thanks to the freedom of sexual life and NOT because of religions! Yet, the monogamous system (and even the civic monogamous marriage which is inspired from the monogamous Christian marriage.) is still suppressing this natural breeding role of women because many women would only have few options left to breed with :beta and omega males since alphas would be already 'taken'.

Last edited by LePetitPrince on 19 Jan 2008, 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I don't support the idea of women with multiple husbands as much I don't support the idea of husband with multiple wives.

You just don't want to understand. Read again my posts and you ll see that my system support the 1wive-1husband family ...there's a big difference between 'biological father' and 'husband' Go read about the birds reproduction system in order to understand what I am saying . Each woman would have only ONE husband to live with but this husband would not be necessarily the biological father of her children in case her husband is not biologically an alpha.

That's horrible. Sorry but just because you have an alpha male doesn't mean you are going to produce a great healthy happy alpha baby!

What about alpha females? I've found that men are scared s**tless of alpha females that stand up for themselves and don't take s**t.

Alpha males aren't always great to women just like some of the aspie guys or guys who "think" they might be aspie aren't very good towards women.

Again and again... **sigh** you are refusing my ideas because of the Christian implanted ideas in your mind.



You will only have his sperma but you won't be obliged to pick him as husband , you can pick a beta instead but he just won't be the biological father of your children.




True, but an alpha female won't be able to breed great number of children as an alpha male. From an evolutionary stand point eggs are expensive while sperm are cheap.

nope sorry. These so called beta males are only considered beta not because they are genetically inferior but because they lack the confidence to approach as many women as the alpha males. It doesn't mean they are inferior! I don't understand how a fellow aspie could endorse a no breeding program for what you are describing as the aspie male.

I must admit, some of the males here on this board do piss me off...not all but if they want to breed, that's their right and alot of the aspie males that do piss me off I've looked at their profile and they are not diagnosed aspies. Go figure.

There are some really interesting aspies in this world and in the past. If your plan went through, there wouldn't be alot of need for creative types, inventive types.

This comes from my own mind, not the bible thank you very much.

LePetite, imagine having kids, a mortgage, a car payment (or two) car insurance, property taxes, clothes for your kids, health insurance for your kids, dozens of credit cards, a big house; and then think of how much strain that is by yourself, then think about if there were multiple women coming through your life whether or not you could trust them to have your back, treat your kids well, and get the things taken care of that you can't.

While monogamy I think is for the trust of permanency I think its also there for knowing that someone has your back and that you have a steady partner in life that you can count on. Its a hard world and I can only imagine it getting harder when you have people who's lives and happiness depend on you.

^^ if Asperger is an evolutionary advantageous for human kind then it will survive through my suggested system . If not, then it will be gradually casted out the genetic pool. What 's making you think that I wish to have an autistic child that who would suffer in school as much as I suffered??

my suggested system won't disallow of having all of these.

People need to correct bullies. Even if autism were out of the picture, bullies find something else.

It's the bully mentality that is the problem.

^^ You would only have the alpha's sperma , you won't care if he's nice or jerk or bully. You can choose a nice beta aspie as husband for life.

ummm, are you implying that if I had alpha sperm, there would be no bullies because they will stand up for themselves???

There's always someone bigger and badder than the next person. Alpha sperm doesn't mean strong super hero

With your "system" you are basically a dictator and controlling population your way. What if I want a geek scientist daughter or son? If all we had were people you thought were superior then this world would be boring.

You were picked on in school? So were alot of people and they didn't have autism.

Also we see how things are going in China and India with who is deemed quality life and who isn't. Females are aborted for their gender.

Are you telling me the society isn't to blame and their methods are great?