Serious issues with L&D Forum

Page 21 of 30 [ 473 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 30  Next

TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

08 May 2016, 7:31 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
Surely then someone can give me an example of a post expressing reality to which a woman objected.

You're really asking people to go through years of posts in the forums to prove your point for an argument unrelated to the topic? This is getting bonkers now, and I think I'll be leaving the thread for people who have more constructive things to say than us, or before it inevitably gets locked for outliving its purpose.

B19, I'm with you on that one. The thread should probably get locked now.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

08 May 2016, 7:34 pm

Quote:
I have seen examples but I'm not going to dig them up.


Well, I'm disappointed that you're willing to make negative assertions without backing them up.

Quote:
I spent a lot of time writing what I wrote. You put minimal effort in responding. That is insulting.


How on earth could you know how much effort I put into responding? You're basically saying that you're offended because my post wasn't lengthy. :?



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

08 May 2016, 7:43 pm

Guy makes well thought out, carefully worded post trying to help with an ongoing site issue, and is taken out of context by a bitter, perpetually aggrieved poster who can't even be bothered to explain her "reasoning"; L&D in a nutshell... :roll:


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

08 May 2016, 7:48 pm

I've reported your attack, Dox. Have a nice day.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

08 May 2016, 7:51 pm

People get hurt here, and the hurts that are inflicted are not accidental nor a theory of mind thing; they are deliberate actions intended to wound, and singling out this or that person as a scapegoat for the whole is just more destructiveness. This place is a swamp.



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

08 May 2016, 7:51 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
I've reported your attack, Dox. Have a nice day.


You know the discussion has gone down the toilet when people start bragging about reporting really trivial posts.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

08 May 2016, 7:52 pm

Also, we've got a mod right here wringing her hands about how awful all this sneering snark is, yet not taking any action against the poster slinging it... Any particular reason for that?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

08 May 2016, 7:53 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
I've reported your attack, Dox. Have a nice day.


Did I mention you by name?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

08 May 2016, 7:57 pm

Quote:
You know the discussion has gone down the toilet when people start bragging about reporting really trivial posts


I'm not bragging, and it's not your place to decide that an insult against someone else is "trivial".



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

08 May 2016, 7:58 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Guy makes well thought out, carefully worded post trying to help with an ongoing site issue, and is taken out of context by a bitter, perpetually aggrieved poster who can't even be bothered to explain her "reasoning"; L&D in a nutshell... :roll:

Please don't defend me by adding more insult. You're just escalating things. I really wanted an honest discussion. I did not intend to start a pissing match.



Astro77
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 114
Location: Ohio

08 May 2016, 8:00 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
Surely then someone can give me an example of a post expressing reality to which a woman objected.

You're really asking people to go through years of posts in the forums to prove your point for an argument unrelated to the topic? This is getting bonkers now, and I think I'll be leaving the thread for people who have more constructive things to say than us, or before it inevitably gets locked for outliving its purpose.

B19, I'm with you on that one. The thread should probably get locked now.


Isn't that kind of her point? If it takes that long to find just a couple of examples, then does his point have any merit? I'm not saying I agree with her, but if someone is going to make a claim, then they need to be able to back it up.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

08 May 2016, 8:01 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Also, we've got a mod right here wringing her hands about how awful all this sneering snark is, yet not taking any action against the poster slinging it... Any particular reason for that?


FYI we don't moderate threads in which we participate - as in conflict of interest. I thought you would know that.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

08 May 2016, 8:03 pm

I edited my post a few pages back to remove the wording someone didn't like. I still would like an honest discussion.

marshall wrote:
I've observed that women are offended by guys complaining that women will only date guys with money. It isn't quite as simple as that, but there is a grain of truth to it. I believe men experience greater stigma for being employment challenged than women. There is a stigma on people who are on disability or only work part time, and this stigma does fall disproportionately harder on men. Maybe it's not as bad now as it was in the 50s, but it still exists to some degree and I think men on this forum experience it. It isn't because women as a group are more prejudiced than men. It has little to do with anything women consciously decide as a group. It's simply due to the influence of traditional gender roles, the same ones that feminists claim are sexist. It isn't something deliberately imposed by either women or men, but both sexes are influenced by culture.

With that said, I suppose it is sexist to say "women only want money", or "women are materialistic". I don't think this is true at all. I think it comes up when the lonely guys complain because they are experiencing something. They are experiencing the effects of gender roles. Maybe men on here should be more conscious in trying to avoid phrases like the ones above that most of us would agree are offensive.

It is another thing though to just outright deny the reality of what men experience, that they are disproportionately rejected for being on disability or working only part time. To just outright dismiss this because the idea that it even exists is somehow sexist or offensive to women in turn offends men by silencing their ability to express certain frustrations. The knee-jerk denial and instant dismissal of their complaints invalidates their experience completely. This I think is a large source of hostility.

I get that it appears guys are singling out women as a group when they complain about their experiences, but I think the reality is this... guys say "women" a lot because they are heterosexual and thus aren't attempting to date men. If they did date men, you would probably see a lot more complaints directed at "men". In other words, I don't think the singling out of "women" as a group is really intentional. I suppose guys should be encouraged to substitute "people" for "women" when they talk about negative dating experiences. Maybe that would help. I just don't think prohibiting men from ever complaining about experiences is helpful as they will just feel as though they are being told their feelings don't matter and they should just shut up. I think it has to be a two way street for there to be understanding on both sides. I don't think telling people who vent to shut up helps anything. It increases hostility.

I really tried hard to word everything as carefully as possible so nobody jumps down my thought. I don't know if it is avoidable though. I'm trying my best.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

08 May 2016, 8:05 pm

Chill out!



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

08 May 2016, 8:13 pm

I think that posts in L&D should be about specific people and personal situations. If a woman rejects a man because he doesn't make enough money, then the post should be about that woman and that experience. If people want to make threads discussing whether or not women in general reject men for whatever reason, that's a subject for PPR.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

08 May 2016, 8:23 pm

B19 wrote:

FYI we don't moderate threads in which we participate - as in conflict of interest. I thought you would know that.


While I've been advocating for that policy longer than you've been a member, let alone a mod, last I checked it wasn't a rule, and it certainly doesn't stop you from grabbing another mod or just issuing a "cool it" post in a non mod capacity, rather than just publicly lamenting how awful we all are.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez