aside from sperm, what good are men?

Page 22 of 29 [ 449 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 29  Next

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,160
Location: Adelaide, Australia

12 Jul 2016, 10:55 pm

We're not conservative lol


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

13 Jul 2016, 1:06 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
We're not conservative lol


I didn't say all the guys here are conservative--but the conservative contingent on this forum is very vocal and vitriolic, especially towards liberals and feminists.


_________________
"Ego non immanis, sed mea immanis telum." ~ Ares, God of War

(Note to Moderators: my warning number is wrong on my profile but apparently can't be fixed so I will note here that it is actually 2, not 3--the warning issued to me on Aug 20 2016 was a mistake but I've been told it can't be removed.)


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,160
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Jul 2016, 1:10 am

wilburforce wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
We're not conservative lol
I didn't say all the guys here are conservative--but the conservative contingent on this forum is very vocal and vitriolic, especially towards liberals and feminists.
Oh. Well don't pay any attention to those dorks lol


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

13 Jul 2016, 1:42 am

zeertheseer wrote:
Aside From Sperm, What Good Are Men?

that's a good question. technically speaking, not even sperm is necessary for reproduction with today's technology anyway (besides, if you ask me, it might even be a good thing if humans stopped reproducing altogether, at least for a while). i don't see how that's relevant to your situation though. i'll explain why:

for all i care, men could be sentenced to extinction by natural death. "new law: no new male babies allowed". i'm fine with that. or even, "new law: all men shall be subjected to mandatory sex change". i'm fine with that too. millions of people out there wouldn't be, though. why is it so, beats me. men are just totally and completely uninteresting. to me :)

it's hard to fathom that my view isn't shared by the entirety of the human population as well, but the reality is beyond obvious anyway. most women are attracted to men, just as much as most men are attracted to women. there is no logical reasoning for it and there doesn't need to be. it's just fact. i do not comprehend how come anyone can be attracted to a man, but it just doesn't matter that i don't comprehend it. it's not up to me. and even if i don't find men interesting or particularly useful in any way, all the better for me if women will generally disagree :mrgreen:. because... i happen to be male. bottom line is it doesn't matter if it makes me feel uninteresting, because there are people (namely, women) out there who i'd find interesting and who would find me interesting as well

now if someone would insist in making me feel uncomfortable for the same reasons why they were attracted to me in the first place, that's on them. i am not responsible for such disappointment that they may feel about me, and i have no obligation to keep up with conflicting expectations. if an initial expression of attraction for me implies the imposition of increasing expectations not founded on anything i have shown or expressed, then i'm out. it's a stupid game i refuse to play, nothing to do with me being male. it's just self-preservation against [knowingly or unknowingly] inconsiderate individuals

my sex/gender/whatever you call it doesn't define me any more than my mental-health conditions do. in other words, it loosely defines much of what i can't be, but not much of what i can. it's only one fact about me among many others. if you follow self-defeating thinking, you can always find a demographic that you happen to be part of which makes you doomed to tragedy when you equate yourself to it, no matter who in the universe you are

that's what i don't get about feminism and counter-feminism trends btw. or any other form or activism, for that matter. as theoretical ideas to be systematically discussed and promoted accordingly through formal rules and initiatives, sure, it makes perfect sense. but as a personal thing, 24/7... i just don't get it. people will be people. they won't accept me or understand me any better if i preach to them that they should do so. best case is they won't be pissed off with me (which, in their place, i probably would)

edit:
anagram wrote:
people will be people. they won't accept me or understand me any better if i preach to them that they should do so

or, more specifically, if i preach that they should do so just because i happen to be part of demographic xyz, as if i and my arbitrary demographic slice of the population are one and the same -- for better or... for better, because that's how activism works


_________________
404


Last edited by anagram on 13 Jul 2016, 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

13 Jul 2016, 1:49 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
We're not conservative lol


Just because one criticizes something in radical feminism doesn't mean he or she is conservative.

And conservatives are part of societies too, you can't eliminate them.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,160
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Jul 2016, 2:28 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
We're not conservative lol
Just because one criticizes something in radical feminism doesn't mean he or she is conservative.

And conservatives are part of societies too, you can't eliminate them.
If we did it would be undemocratic. It would be like telling people they're only allowed to vote for the Democrats. A one sided democracy is a contradiction in terms.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

13 Jul 2016, 4:53 am

Jacoby wrote:
It seems I have no choice but to eliminate this Jamesy for ruining my good name :evil:
:P

Go get the truck, I'll bring my tranq's. XD


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

13 Jul 2016, 8:13 am

anagram wrote:
for all i care, men could be sentenced to extinction by natural death. "new law: no new male babies allowed".
Then Pharaoh gave this order to all his people: "Every Hebrew boy that is born you must throw into the Nile, but let every girl live." (Exodus 1:22 NIV)



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

13 Jul 2016, 2:41 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
anagram wrote:
for all i care, men could be sentenced to extinction by natural death. "new law: no new male babies allowed".
Then Pharaoh gave this order to all his people: "Every Hebrew boy that is born you must throw into the Nile, but let every girl live." (Exodus 1:22 NIV)

he failed to establish a successful coalition government though and his proposal has been stuck in congress ever since

i'd still like to see an example of the second hypothetical law i mentioned though :)


_________________
404


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

13 Jul 2016, 10:07 pm

If you locked The Thread That Shall Not Be Named, then you gotta lock this one too. Otherwise, you're being prejudiced, biased, and discriminatory.

Oh, wait. Only denigrating women is bad. Denigrating men is OK. Never mind. Carry on.



ShesGone
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 202
Location: Rent for Whatever Wannabes

13 Jul 2016, 10:42 pm

I should've typed eggs instead of sex....


_________________
I'll stay gay toward you ♥-♥


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Jul 2016, 1:35 am

Aspie1 wrote:
If you locked The Thread That Shall Not Be Named, then you gotta lock this one too. Otherwise, you're being prejudiced, biased, and discriminatory.

Oh, wait. Only denigrating women is bad. Denigrating men is OK. Never mind. Carry on.


The mod who locked the other thread didn't even mention this one, which was the original thread. They don't even see it lol.

The female equivalent locked at page 5, here we are past 20.



marcb0t
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: Washington

14 Jul 2016, 1:48 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Aspie1 wrote:
If you locked The Thread That Shall Not Be Named, then you gotta lock this one too. Otherwise, you're being prejudiced, biased, and discriminatory.

Oh, wait. Only denigrating women is bad. Denigrating men is OK. Never mind. Carry on.


The mod who locked the other thread didn't even mention this one, which was the original thread. They don't even see it lol.

The female equivalent locked at page 5, here we are past 20.

I do agree that it is not fair. Even though I find the topic and threads distasteful.

I sent a personal message to a moderator explaining the double standard being crammed down our throats.

Of course since men seem to be scum of the earth, I'm sure they will not even pay attention.

Both thread should be allowed to continue, and people need to grow up and stop being over sensitive. And stop being hypocrites.

Either close down both, or leave both open.


_________________
The cutest most lovable little rob0t on Earth! (^.^)


314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

14 Jul 2016, 2:16 am

marcb0t wrote:
Both thread should be allowed to continue, and people need to grow up and stop being over sensitive. And stop being hypocrites.

Maybe that's a good way to teach us about how love and dating is in the real world. What's the point of having an idealistic forum in an imperfect world?



ShesGone
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 202
Location: Rent for Whatever Wannabes

14 Jul 2016, 2:22 am

Dudes, we should let it go. I believe there will come when women stop abusing us. Okay, some women.


_________________
I'll stay gay toward you ♥-♥


anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

14 Jul 2016, 2:31 am

314pe wrote:
What's the point of having an idealistic forum in an imperfect world?

i don't entirely disagree with the sentiment, but by that reasoning we should all be aiming to reproduce all the unpleasant elements of the world at large inside our own homes. you know, toughen up and get over it

the thing isn't accepting or allowing or inviting the inevitable annoyances of the world into your own environment, but accepting instead that they exist and always will. the world is not a fair place and never will be. present-day culture does a disservice to everyone by insisting that fairness is the default state of the universe and that it's probably your fault when anything seems to suggest otherwise. on the other hand, people blaming thousands of other people for one person in their life that they're pissed off with but can't confront is the oldest thing in the world, so there's that


_________________
404