zeertheseer wrote:
Aside From Sperm, What Good Are Men?
that's a good question. technically speaking, not even sperm is necessary for reproduction with today's technology anyway (besides, if you ask me, it might even be a good thing if humans stopped reproducing altogether, at least for a while). i don't see how that's relevant to your situation though. i'll explain why:
for all i care, men could be sentenced to extinction by natural death. "new law: no new male babies allowed". i'm fine with that. or even, "new law: all men shall be subjected to mandatory sex change". i'm fine with that too. millions of people out there wouldn't be, though. why is it so, beats me. men are just totally and completely uninteresting.
to me 
it's hard to fathom that my view isn't shared by the entirety of the human population as well, but the reality is beyond obvious anyway. most women are attracted to men, just as much as most men are attracted to women. there is no logical reasoning for it and there doesn't need to be. it's just fact. i do not comprehend how come anyone can be attracted to a man, but it just doesn't matter that i don't comprehend it. it's not up to me. and even if i don't find men interesting or particularly useful in any way, all the better for me if women will generally disagree

. because... i happen to be male. bottom line is it doesn't matter if it makes me feel uninteresting, because there are people (namely, women) out there who i'd find interesting and who would find me interesting as well
now if someone would insist in making me feel uncomfortable for the same reasons why they were attracted to me in the first place, that's on them. i am not responsible for such disappointment that they may feel about me, and i have no obligation to keep up with conflicting expectations. if an initial expression of attraction for me implies the imposition of increasing expectations not founded on anything i have shown or expressed, then
i'm out. it's a stupid game i refuse to play, nothing to do with me being male. it's just self-preservation against [knowingly or unknowingly] inconsiderate individuals
my sex/gender/whatever you call it doesn't define me any more than my mental-health conditions do. in other words, it loosely defines much of what i
can't be, but not much of what i can. it's only one fact about me among many others. if you follow self-defeating thinking, you can always find a demographic that you happen to be part of which makes you doomed to tragedy when you equate yourself to it, no matter who in the universe you are
that's what i don't get about feminism and counter-feminism trends btw. or any other form or activism, for that matter. as theoretical ideas to be systematically discussed and promoted accordingly through formal rules and initiatives, sure, it makes perfect sense. but as a personal thing, 24/7... i just don't get it. people will be people. they won't accept me or understand me any better if i preach to them that they should do so. best case is they won't be pissed off with me (which, in their place, i probably would)
edit:
anagram wrote:
people will be people. they won't accept me or understand me any better if i preach to them that they should do so
or, more specifically, if i preach that they should do so
just because i happen to be part of demographic xyz, as if i and my arbitrary demographic slice of the population are one and the same -- for better or... for better, because that's how activism works
Last edited by anagram on 13 Jul 2016, 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.