Fnord wrote:
Teach51 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Teach51 wrote:
... It doesn't make sense to say to a woman "... It's money, good looks and status that you want." ...
How many women do you personally know who have married a homeless man from off the street? Just asking.That's a little extreme Fnord.
No, it's an honest question.Teach51 wrote:
A man with a good steady job will do for most women.
"Good" and "Steady" being relative, of course. Having no job at all puts many men out of the running for relationships.Teach51 wrote:
Money was never an issue for me choosing a partner as long as he had a solid work ethic, that was sufficient.
Not jobless, eh? What about "Not homeless" as well? Did his living conditions never enter the picture, or would you have been content to go back to his place if it had turned out to be a cardboard box in an alley off of Fifth Street?Teach51 wrote:
Gold diggers and social climbers are something else entirely of course and they probably don't make the most compassionate wives.
Who said anything about gold-diggers? Given the choice between a homeless man with no job, and a full-time shelf-stocker living in a one-bedroom apartment, the man with the job and a place to live will be more likely to be in a relationship.
While wealth and social status may not be the primary conditions for most women to enter into a relationship, the complete lack of wealth and social status are certainly deal-breakers.Yes. I agree because women want to have a partner who can help support a family. A humble job will do. My point is that women are drawn to charisma and kindness, someone who will
LISTEN to them and validate their feelings, more than they desire money and status. I mentioned gold diggers as an ugly exception to the norm of most women's motives to find a partner. Kraftie is right, women can fall in love with people down on their luck. We nurture rather than compete.
_________________
My best will just have to be good enough.
Last edited by Teach51 on 19 Jun 2019, 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.