A comment on the "who has it worse" question...

Page 4 of 4 [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

biostructure
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,456

14 Nov 2010, 2:12 am

Erisad wrote:
emlion wrote:
Erisad wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Well, Erisad certainly had more dates than Toad and she has a bf ;). She wouldn't even consider to date TOS.

umm, sorry , I was just thinking loud!


Lol, hi Boo. I love how I'm brought up in these kinds of threads without having made a post in it first. Oh internet gossip, lol. Do I feel bad for Toad? Yes. However I felt like it wouldn't work out due to distance and I just didn't feel a connection with him. I wasn't going to act like I did have feelings when I didn't. That would be far too cruel. D:

As for the OP, I'm exhausted with this kind of discussion. Let's talk about something happy! :D


YAY HAPPY THINGS.


Yaaaaay indeed! :D

Biostructure - No need to be rude about it. I'm just stating that these men vs women wars in this forum are so overplayed. There are plenty of threads that you can search through for these kinds of topics. Threads like these only serve to start flame wars, there is no positive outcome for these kinds of discussions. Just saying. :/


I wish there were more opportunities to discuss this insightfully here, where people presented their understanding of the issue. In fact, the most promising comment was the second one from "menintights". I'm interested in what she thinks causes differences between men and women.

In fact, that's probably the most productive way to continue, and the one I will take, to continue the discussion with her over PM.



ZakFiend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 547

14 Nov 2010, 3:53 am

biostructure wrote:

I wish there were more opportunities to discuss this insightfully here, where people presented their understanding of the issue. In fact, the most promising comment was the second one from "menintights".


Men and women are raised differently yes. But they still have all the trappings of having a mammalian brain.

Most people never learn that their mind or body cannot be trusted and feelings and perspectives must be constantly criticized, few people have the capacity to do this and correctly criticize their own thought processes and interpretation of reality, thus there is mass confusion.

Most people believe things because it feels good or they identify with it (for social reasons) not because they actually want to know the truth (which is a time consuming endeavor).

Most people want certainty rather then deal with ambiguity.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Nov 2010, 6:14 am

katzefrau wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing


i like to think we're a bit more and our behaviors reflect desires with greater complexity than our basest instincts .. or at the very least we can give them consideration and then make more logical decisions when we act, since if we were only operating on that base level it would put (according to the stereotypes) men and women at odds with each other irreconcilably (men wanting more partners than women do) and plenty of people overcome the differences and partner up.

also i find it interesting sometimes men throw around this element of the male psyche as if it's just how they're wired and thus they need sex or novelty. but if women did the same for being primarily motivated by wanting a partner that could provide financially, they would get slammed thoroughly as women already get slammed for being this way (looking for a person with money) although i think most of us aren't.

it's easy to lean on the stereotypes if you're having a hard time getting a partner (person x doesn't like me because she's a gold digger, person y doesn't like me because he only wants sex and i want a relationship) but it is infinitely more complex than that.





*sigh* I feel that you like to target me whenever I say something stereotypical.

Me : *saying something stereotypical*
katzefrau: **ninja fast cut-throat move** eeeeyyyaaa!
Me : :eye:



Anyways, the "For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing" was first said by our lady kiwi Tsiiki on page 2 of this thread.

I feel that you're selectively targeting me , leave me alone :(.



Second, I agree that we are more than just basic instinct, you can see that in my post on page 2.

Me and Tsiiki are talking about the animal instincts in humans, biology, studies and theories , do not take any of it personally and do not ever think that I am discussing those stuff because of my personal failures in finding a partner , I just love biology and animal world.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

14 Nov 2010, 10:33 am

ZakFiend wrote:
menintights wrote:
ZakFiend wrote:
No one can talk about this topic rationally it's pointless. You'd actually have to do a study and get the mathematical statistics to find out who has it worse, I'd bet on men easily, since Aspie men commit suicide over not being able to find a partner on a much more frequent basis, and I suspect it is very rare for women to do so. Since they have access to warm bodies if they want it, it's only a woman's prejudice and lack of persistence that keeps her out of relationship.

Mathematically more death is worse IMHO.


Zak, seriously. Do you listen to yourself when you talk?


I counsel people with AS, so I hear about these kinds of things OFTEN. Do you have any experience with people with AS at all? Didn't think so.

wow, you're not exactly an unbiased ear are you? i hope you are not doing any damage to these men by convincing them to hate women.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Tsiiki
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 242

14 Nov 2010, 3:46 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
katzefrau wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing


i like to think we're a bit more and our behaviors reflect desires with greater complexity than our basest instincts .. or at the very least we can give them consideration and then make more logical decisions when we act, since if we were only operating on that base level it would put (according to the stereotypes) men and women at odds with each other irreconcilably (men wanting more partners than women do) and plenty of people overcome the differences and partner up.

also i find it interesting sometimes men throw around this element of the male psyche as if it's just how they're wired and thus they need sex or novelty. but if women did the same for being primarily motivated by wanting a partner that could provide financially, they would get slammed thoroughly as women already get slammed for being this way (looking for a person with money) although i think most of us aren't.

it's easy to lean on the stereotypes if you're having a hard time getting a partner (person x doesn't like me because she's a gold digger, person y doesn't like me because he only wants sex and i want a relationship) but it is infinitely more complex than that.





*sigh* I feel that you like to target me whenever I say something stereotypical.

Me : *saying something stereotypical*
katzefrau: **ninja fast cut-throat move** eeeeyyyaaa!
Me : :eye:



Anyways, the "For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing" was first said by our lady kiwi Tsiiki on page 2 of this thread.

I feel that you're selectively targeting me , leave me alone :(.



Second, I agree that we are more than just basic instinct, you can see that in my post on page 2.

Me and Tsiiki are talking about the animal instincts in humans, biology, studies and theories , do not take any of it personally and do not ever think that I am discussing those stuff because of my personal failures in finding a partner , I just love biology and animal world.


Yeh, I agree that we are more than instinct.

But we cannot deny that biology/evolution/instinct does NOT play a part in who we are. Men have a biological need for sexual release, it has been shown over and over and over again in numerous studies. But that doesn't mean that every guy sees a chick walking down the street and must attack her to get the release, they can control it and go home and deal with it themselves, or go to a bar for a one-night stand, etc.

I was just posting how the biology between men and women is different, and socially, it does affect us. Of course there are exceptions, there are always exceptions, this is more a law of averages, with people on either end of the spectrum in exceptions. I'm with boo, I find it really interesting how different factors play into this. (I'm not so interested in biology say, but I love seeing how theres always more than one side to thing, and more than one factor that causes situations)



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Nov 2010, 4:34 pm

Tsiiki wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
katzefrau wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing


i like to think we're a bit more and our behaviors reflect desires with greater complexity than our basest instincts .. or at the very least we can give them consideration and then make more logical decisions when we act, since if we were only operating on that base level it would put (according to the stereotypes) men and women at odds with each other irreconcilably (men wanting more partners than women do) and plenty of people overcome the differences and partner up.

also i find it interesting sometimes men throw around this element of the male psyche as if it's just how they're wired and thus they need sex or novelty. but if women did the same for being primarily motivated by wanting a partner that could provide financially, they would get slammed thoroughly as women already get slammed for being this way (looking for a person with money) although i think most of us aren't.

it's easy to lean on the stereotypes if you're having a hard time getting a partner (person x doesn't like me because she's a gold digger, person y doesn't like me because he only wants sex and i want a relationship) but it is infinitely more complex than that.





*sigh* I feel that you like to target me whenever I say something stereotypical.

Me : *saying something stereotypical*
katzefrau: **ninja fast cut-throat move** eeeeyyyaaa!
Me : :eye:



Anyways, the "For males, since their basic instinctive goal is to increase their chances of reproducing" was first said by our lady kiwi Tsiiki on page 2 of this thread.

I feel that you're selectively targeting me , leave me alone :(.



Second, I agree that we are more than just basic instinct, you can see that in my post on page 2.

Me and Tsiiki are talking about the animal instincts in humans, biology, studies and theories , do not take any of it personally and do not ever think that I am discussing those stuff because of my personal failures in finding a partner , I just love biology and animal world.


Yeh, I agree that we are more than instinct.

But we cannot deny that biology/evolution/instinct does NOT play a part in who we are. Men have a biological need for sexual release, it has been shown over and over and over again in numerous studies. But that doesn't mean that every guy sees a chick walking down the street and must attack her to get the release, they can control it and go home and deal with it themselves, or go to a bar for a one-night stand, etc.

I was just posting how the biology between men and women is different, and socially, it does affect us. Of course there are exceptions, there are always exceptions, this is more a law of averages, with people on either end of the spectrum in exceptions. I'm with boo, I find it really interesting how different factors play into this. (I'm not so interested in biology say, but I love seeing how theres always more than one side to thing, and more than one factor that causes situations)


Thank you.

And oh ...as a reply to your earlier post:

Quote:
While yes, the social status (or financial) does seem to affect the majority of women (according to that study and such), I don't think putting a hot celeb infront of them would show that. Why? Because those hot celebs aren't out there to marry that person, just have casual sex, so they aren't getting the financial, and especially, emotional support from them that they want, sure more women might go for it, but I doubt all, and it won't show whether or not its because its social status, financial status, bragging rights or what. Theres way too many factors involved with that, and its not showing what your suggesting it should.


People do not think in this logical way when the attraction spark hits them, if a hot celeb approaches some regular woman unexpectedly , she wouldn't think in this checklist way "Will he be a loyal partner? will he dump me after one night? does he have good genes? Will he be a good father...etc etc" , nope , this is not how it happens. What it most likely to happens that many female regular citizens would be extremely flattered for being approached by a famous hot celeb and would go with the flow of attraction without much thinking of the consequences , many others would find it as a dream that came true , once-in-life opportunity that cannot missed , a chance for getting a dream partner and gaining instant fame (instant boost of social status) .

As I said before, I bet that a large majority of female teens would say 'yes' to "Cullen" (hoping that it might develop to something deeper later) , many of them worship that guy already!

A typical teen would think "OMG OMG Cullen is asking me for a day out!! my friends will die of jealously!! I ll be known as Cullen's gf in whole school!! !"

Now why this? Again, they're about the instincts that we are talking about



I say that observing female teens' behaviors tell us much more about the female human primitive brain than the adults since they rely more instinct and less on....reason. :P



Tsiiki
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 242

14 Nov 2010, 5:33 pm

Well I won't argue with that... I know personally I fight emotions/instinct with logic, so not the best example XD

But no way to know until such a study is done~

But I do believe there are more than one factor going into play when it comes to celebs, so hard to pinpoint exaclty what it is (I mean, it could simply be the boost in social status, or it could be the instinct of finding someone who's a good provider, or maybe something else that I can't think with my half working brain atm)

I also believe the last study has some more factors at play than simple instinct, but I don't know all the details from it, and it does show a significant rift between the male and female response to the same situation *shrug*

But hey, now you need to convince cullen/paterson dude to go out on a social experiment and see how many women will have random sex with him! xD
But also needa do it with other actors, female versions as well, and some really rich business men, etc... see how all of the factors play!

But in the end, we don't really know, and can only hypothesize *shrug* :P



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Nov 2010, 5:41 pm

Quote:
But hey, now you need to convince cullen/paterson dude to go out on a social experiment and see how many women will have random sex with him! xD


That would cost more than any study XD

and you're right, I am just assuming and estimating stuff based on my personal observations, but we can only know for sure when a such study occurs.



katzefrau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,835
Location: emerald city

14 Nov 2010, 10:04 pm

Boo, read my post again. it wasn't an attack of any sort; it was a well thought out observation based on something that i pulled out of your post, simply. if i had happened to agree with you, i think you'd have interpreted it differently.

adhering to stereotypes to explain people does nothing except impede one's ability to get to know people as individuals.

but if you want to call me a ninja, be my guest.

:ninja:


_________________
Now a penguin may look very strange in a living room, but a living room looks very strange to a penguin.


Sirius
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 63
Location: Fresno, CA

15 Nov 2010, 1:12 am

Men are expected to take control. That is one thing that is not in my genes without question. I don't have an Alpha bone in my body. From the experience I have had so far, it seems to me I am not doing 'my job' as a man.