Page 4 of 6 [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

11 Jul 2006, 10:23 am

juliekitty wrote:
Ahhhh, the egotistical thrill of seeing my name on this thread! I'll take December, please.

Quote:
My point was more that the odds of an aspie
guy and aspie girl getting together are close to zero.


Not anymore, with the Internet on our side, I hope.

I would love to have an aspie boyfriend. That's why I posted my profile on the aspie dating site: http://www.aspieaffection.com

I'd like to see a lot more people do the same! Or, at least, more local guys... ;)


The distance is a problem. I've meet a NT girl on the net IRL but she was only
40 miles away. It did not work out. I talk non-stop in most one-on-one situations,
but I could not find any words on my date. I could sense she was not crazy about me and I did not ask her for a second date. If you were closer juliekitty I would
want to meet you(I'm in Texas).



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

11 Jul 2006, 10:56 am

Hi Juliekitty, nice to see you again. Would you be interested in serveing on the editorial committee for our calendar? See this thread- http://www.wrongplanet.net/asperger.htm ... 404#252404

-Thanks,
Mark

:jester: :heart: :jester:



Bopkasen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 541

11 Jul 2006, 5:07 pm

1. I know that I am not handsome but I am not sure how girl think about me?

Posts your pictures, profile, and keyword at www.hotornot.com. Let it run for about a month and get the most median on the rating 1-10.

2. Stereotypes?

No comments. You need to cover scientist's tracks on that matter. Who know? This might be a good application to DNA mapping.

3. Can't find someone?

You either embarrassed or bashful, try posting something online and see if you can get some response.

4. Girls with asperger are pretty?

Asperger is a internal disorder in the brain and doesn't effect the outward look. A male apies tend to admire pictures of female. No offense gal.

5. Aspies have hunchback?

It not being aspies that give us hunchback, it spending too much on computer while leaning toward the monitor screen. By the way, the reason why geek people wear glasses is because they stare at monitor for ages that causes eye strain. Eye doctor recommend people with eye strain to wear glasses.

Why do we like a freak?

If you were spending time in a bomb shelter for year and come out. Don't you think you look like that? Your hair not comb, beard unshaven, etc.



Raph522
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,717

11 Jul 2006, 6:23 pm

i have geek tendencies but i do not look like the geek stereotypes.



AaronAgassi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 397

11 Jul 2006, 7:08 pm

juliekitty wrote:
That was a quick report! Good work. :)

Oh, bite me, juliekitty. And plenty quick! No really, I'm getting cranky.



ethamin
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 215
Location: Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur

11 Jul 2006, 10:37 pm

Jessica Peers looks very pretty but not prodigious. You have just seen three of such girls with Asperger syndrom walking around? Such emphasis on outward appearance seems, to me, to be outdated. What I like about most Asperger females is that they are outspoken, clever, and most of all, are an individual. I like them to be a bit geeky too. I have seen many, pretty, but geeky, freaky girls. And not just among those who have Asperger syndrome. My sister is such a girl. She is great fun to be around with. The same description of girls I like, I also adopt to guys. I believe you first have to become friends with someone before you can engage in a romantic relationship.



renaeden
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,453
Location: Western Australia

13 Jul 2006, 3:28 am

lowfreq50 wrote:
The stereotype of a geek/nerd is an unkept, zit-faced, four-eyes with a worn-out Star Trek t-shirt. In other words: very unattractive.


WOOHOO!! !!
That's me!





How did you know?



newchum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 641

13 Jul 2006, 4:06 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Women with AS are not better or worse looking than NTs.

It's a warped opinion based on bias and also personal preference. Same with AS males.


On wrongplanet.net least physically (there are other things like personality which determines especially women are attractive), the female members cover a broad spectrum from not attractive physically to quite attractive physically. Likewise for the male members of wrongplanet, same as offline.



newchum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 641

13 Jul 2006, 4:10 am

hale_bopp wrote:

But not all geeks are aspies.. most geeks are just unpopular NTs.


I dunno Hale, a lot of NT geeks have more friends and are more sociable than a lot of aspies (hence more popular). I see NT geeks who have more extensive social networks and more experience in things like dating than I and a lot of aspie guys ever have.



newchum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 641

13 Jul 2006, 4:15 am

lowfreq50 wrote:

Your head . . . please remove it from under the rock.

The stereotype of a geek/nerd is an unkept, zit-faced, four-eyes with a worn-out Star Trek t-shirt. In other words: very unattractive.

And, it just so happens that Aspies pretty much ARE the stereotype. Some of us can pass as "cool" but most of us are geeks/nerds by the cool-people standards.


I used the stereotype of a geek/nerd, minus the glasses. Still even now when I manage to pass off as 'normal' I am still quite a dork :p



Veresae
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,023

13 Jul 2006, 1:47 pm

You guys are confusing "geek" with "nerd" and "dork."

GEEK: These guys aren't necessarily unattractive, depending on your point of view. They're just really obsessed with geeky things, such as: the sort of "geek" films discussed at sites like Ain't It Cool News or JoBlo; comic books; computer or video games; Star Wars; Lord of the Rings; Star Trek; Harry Potter; The Matrix; etc. EDIT: Oh, and anime. There ya go, Hale_Bopp. (Not everyone who likes this stuff is a geek, though, just those who are rather or totally obsessed with it.)

NERD: Good with computers, be it hardware or software. Includes computer game geeks, but not console game geeks (except the really hardcore ones). Tends to be good at math and science but not always. Many hackers could be described as this.

DORK: That icky, extremely unattractive, fat, pimply kid who has terrible BO and always has a retainer in his mouth, and always tries hanging out with the "cool kids" anyway. While Geeks and Nerds are more inclined to be friends with other Geeks and Nerds, the Dork is an outcast among outcasts--a guy who rejects his geekiness or nerdiness and desperately wants to be liked by the popular kids, and always fails miserably. (If he doesn't, he doesn't count as a dork anymore.)

Y'all are talking about dorks, not geeks. Geeks are often, to other geeks, very attractive. Dorks, however, are not.

And yes, it's extremely possible for someone to fit in a combination of the three categories, and all three at once.



Last edited by Veresae on 13 Jul 2006, 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

13 Jul 2006, 2:11 pm

Veresae wrote:
You guys are confusing "geek" with "nerd" and "dork."

GEEK: Someone obsessed with geeky things, such as: the sort of "geek" films discussed at sites like Ain't It Cool News or JoBlo; comic books; computer or video games; Star Wars; Lord of the Rings; Star Trek; Harry Potter; The Matrix; etc.

NERD: Good with computers, be it hardware or software. Includes computer game geeks, but not console game geeks (except the really hardcore ones). Tends to be good at math and science but not always. Many hackers could be described as this.

DORK: That icky, extremely unattractive, fat, pimply kid who has terrible BO and always has a retainer in his mouth, and always tries hanging out with the "cool kids" anyway. While Geeks and Nerds are more inclined to be friends with other Geeks and Nerds, the Dork is an outcast among outcasts--a guy who rejects his geekiness or nerdiness and desperately wants to be liked by the popular kids, and always fails miserably. (If he doesn't, he doesn't count as a dork anymore.)

Y'all are talking about dorks, not geeks. Geeks are often, to other geeks, very attractive. Dorks, however, are not.

And yes, it's extremely possible for someone to fit in a combination of the three categories, and all three at once.


I disagree with the dork section tbh. You also forgot anime in the geek section. Geeks are just unnatractive period in my opinion.. it's all about opinion.



Solidess
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 172
Location: Hiding in a box from the cruelty of the world

14 Jul 2006, 1:37 am

I didn't realise there were categories of Geekdom. But as a videogame geek, and since that is being seen as more cool and mainstream these days, I dont think its fair to put me along side Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter geeks! :P

Ahh but you are talking about the REALLY obsessive ones? The trekkies, the ones who dress into costumes and memorise all the dialog of games or movies? I mean I like Star Trek casually, but I'm not all hard-core with it.

You know, in fact, I dont think anyone could be considered a Geek or whatever. Isn't EVERYONE a Geek (or 'freak') of something or another, as a result of being SO obsessed/immersed in something?

Some people are movie freaks.

Others are car freaks.

Others are videogame freaks.

Others are music freaks (into a particular band or bands)

Some are fashion freaks.


You see what I'm saying here? EVERYONE is probably a geek of something or another. Without that, we wouldn't have such creative and passionate individuals who are driving their industries forward and making change. Even though you couldn't say my Dad LOOKS like any sort of a geek, but he IS a Pink Floyd and Fly Fishing nut. So, thats makes him a geek of those interests. No?



AaronAgassi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 397

14 Jul 2006, 2:33 am

Even these labels are more clearly defined then Asperger's!



Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

14 Jul 2006, 5:54 am

I would personally say that I'm a minor geek. 10 years ago, that would be different, I was obsessed completely with Doctor Who. However, I've branched out. British comedy, forensics, and various videogame series like Final Fantasy, Silent Hill, Metal Gear Solid and Legacy of Kain.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

14 Jul 2006, 6:04 am

Quote:
You see what I'm saying here? EVERYONE is probably a geek of something or another. Without that, we wouldn't have such creative and passionate individuals who are driving their industries forward and making change. Even though you couldn't say my Dad LOOKS like any sort of a geek, but he IS a Pink Floyd and Fly Fishing nut. So, thats makes him a geek of those interests. No?


If you look at the true definition of geek.

But the classic current day geek stereotype is someone obsessed with computers, computer games, anime, comics and computer geek jargon such as saying things like "OMG LOL" in a sarcastic way in real life.