MrEGuy wrote:
I was doing pretty well up until the astrophysicist part.
How do you expect any woman to want you if you aren't an astrophysicist?
Honestly, some people...
shrox wrote:
What about my needs?
You lack food, water, oxygen and shelter? I am sorry to hear that.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
You need to seduce your target man in order to have a chance with him, he won't pop up from thin air.
But he's meant to!! !! It's my right as a female!! !! !
*stomps feet*
emlion wrote:
Gotta wear a push-up bra + a short skirt to bag him, didya know?
Please don't tell me I have to wear high heels too.
Moog wrote:
emlion wrote:
Gotta wear a push-up bra + a short skirt to bag him, didya know?
I got a push up bra, but I still can't do more than 10 reps
Don't worry, Moog; just keep on working at it and you'll land yourself a lovely man one day.
HopefulRomantic wrote:
Perhaps someone can provide me with a logical explanation as to the utility gained by proliferating seemingly unprovoked and unwarranted nastiness? What is the point - does it make one feel better to strike out against someone - especially under the guise of anonymity afforded by the auspices of the Word Wide Web?
For me, it begs the question - would they do it in real life if they were face to face with someone?
It's not nastiness; it's a response to an attitude that is moronic and offensive, and yes, I would say exactly what I said IRL.
Look at rot like these threads:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt180174.htmlhttp://www.wrongplanet.net/postt180226.htmland tell me again that I shouldn't speak out against them, or that I have no right to be angry.
hyperlexian wrote:
i know that all aspie guys don't believe this, and not even most. it's is only a vocal few, but those vocal few make it very hard to be a female on the site. it is extremely discouraging to hear the sexist remarks again and again. sometimes it gets better on the site, and other times it gets worse. right now Who_Am_I noticed what i have also noticed... it's a bit of a low point.
i am not a fan of sarcasm, but i think that her thread kind of highlights the general climate here at the moment.
please report to a moderator if you see any posts that cross the line into actual sexism (or that break the rules for other reasons too). and to people posting, please stop and think before clicking "submit" to reflect whether you are generalising about an entire gender with your words. thank you.
Oh thank God, someone gets it.
I'm a big fan of sarcasm; it's a wonderful way of deflating ideas that are puffed up with hot air.
Reason doesn't seem to be working, so why not ridicule idiotic ideas? It's not like it's difficult.
swbluto wrote:
Well, first of all, you need to get a real world education in dating and the first lesson of it is "Location, Location, Location!". It's not our fault if you're spending way too much time in the music department with fellow destitutes.
Advise me. Where are the rich ones?
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I